Gerrymandering makes hypocrisy a political punch line

Independent thinker

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
38,289
Reaction score
34,945
Points
2,788
Democrats never ending hypocrisy about gerrymandering. They are so full of crap to be outraged over Republican gerrymandering after all of the gerrymandering they have already done.

In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) declared that the move by Texas Republicans to redistrict mid-decade was a “legal insurrection of our U.S. Capitol.”

In Texas, Democratic State Rep. Jolanda Jones (D) must have felt “insurrection” did not quite capture the infamy. Instead, she insisted, “I will liken this to the Holocaust.”

Others repeated the Democratic mantra that it was the death of democracy. That includes former President Barack Obama, who had said nothing when Democrats made his own state the most gerrymandered in the union.

In Illinois, surrounded by Texas legislators who had fled their state to prevent a legislative quorum, Gov. JB Pritzker (D) bellowed that gerrymandering was an attempt to “steal” congressional seats and to “disenfranchise people.”

It did not matter that the stump Pritzker and Texas Democrats were standing on in Chicago is located the most gerrymandered state in the country. The redistricting law, signed by Pritzker left Republicans with just three of the state’s 17 congressional seats, even though they won nearly half the votes in the last election.

Pritzker received roaring cheers when he said that he was protecting democracy from Texas gerrymandering. Colbert then showed him the map of Illinois, which features ridiculously shaped, snaking districts that stretch across the state — all drawn to maximize Democratic performance in elections.

Some of the outrage by Democrats seemed part of a comedy routine. In Massachusetts, Gov. Maura Healey pledged to retaliate by gerrymandering her heavily gerrymandered state. The problem? It is already so badly gerrymandered that there are no Republican House members in the state — there haven’t been any since the 1990s.

It is not cheap to lock Republicans out completely in heavily Democratic states. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) quickly pledged to order a new round of gerrymandering in a state where Republicans constituted roughly 40 percent of the congressional vote in 2024 but received only about 17 percent of the House seats. To reduce the Republicans to near zero would require passage of a ballot proposition, costing more than $200 million, even as California faces a budget crisis and a deficit greater than $20 billion.


 
Democrats never ending hypocrisy about gerrymandering. They are so full of crap to be outraged over Republican gerrymandering after all of the gerrymandering they have already done.

In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) declared that the move by Texas Republicans to redistrict mid-decade was a “legal insurrection of our U.S. Capitol.”

In Texas, Democratic State Rep. Jolanda Jones (D) must have felt “insurrection” did not quite capture the infamy. Instead, she insisted, “I will liken this to the Holocaust.”

Others repeated the Democratic mantra that it was the death of democracy. That includes former President Barack Obama, who had said nothing when Democrats made his own state the most gerrymandered in the union.

In Illinois, surrounded by Texas legislators who had fled their state to prevent a legislative quorum, Gov. JB Pritzker (D) bellowed that gerrymandering was an attempt to “steal” congressional seats and to “disenfranchise people.”

It did not matter that the stump Pritzker and Texas Democrats were standing on in Chicago is located the most gerrymandered state in the country. The redistricting law, signed by Pritzker left Republicans with just three of the state’s 17 congressional seats, even though they won nearly half the votes in the last election.

Pritzker received roaring cheers when he said that he was protecting democracy from Texas gerrymandering. Colbert then showed him the map of Illinois, which features ridiculously shaped, snaking districts that stretch across the state — all drawn to maximize Democratic performance in elections.

Some of the outrage by Democrats seemed part of a comedy routine. In Massachusetts, Gov. Maura Healey pledged to retaliate by gerrymandering her heavily gerrymandered state. The problem? It is already so badly gerrymandered that there are no Republican House members in the state — there haven’t been any since the 1990s.

It is not cheap to lock Republicans out completely in heavily Democratic states. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) quickly pledged to order a new round of gerrymandering in a state where Republicans constituted roughly 40 percent of the congressional vote in 2024 but received only about 17 percent of the House seats. To reduce the Republicans to near zero would require passage of a ballot proposition, costing more than $200 million, even as California faces a budget crisis and a deficit greater than $20 billion.


It’s always blah blah blah insurrection, blah blah blah Impeach, blah blah blah Nazi, blah blah blah rrrrrracist
 
The democrats can't squeeze any more seats if they tried, they are gerrymandered to the max.

Republicans need to squeeze every seat they can out of every red or purple state.
Just watched this a little bit ago:


 
Democrats lost Hispanics who are predominantly Catholic to Republicans.

The democrats are toxic at a 19% approval. Can't wait for those mid-terms.
While the House may be iffy, Republicans will be adding more Senate seats and there will be virtually no blue wave at all. That's historically bad for the minority party at the midterms. If Republicans retain their House majority that will be a total disaster for the blue team and there are no indications whatsoever of a blue wave. Check out this article:

 
The democrats can't squeeze any more seats if they tried, they are gerrymandered to the max.

Republicans need to squeeze every seat they can out of every red or purple state.
Then why did they offer a bill to end gerrymandering that every single Republican voted against?
 
The democrats can't squeeze any more seats if they tried, they are gerrymandered to the max.

Republicans need to squeeze every seat they can out of every red or purple state.
This has been going on a long time. A lot of damage in legislation has been passed.
 
The democrats can't squeeze any more seats if they tried, they are gerrymandered to the max.

Precisely.

And that's the best part.

The Dems' conniption fits are not only futile...

They're also counterproductive, since it will only ultimately dissatisfy their own disillusioned base.

Or what's left of it...
 
Precisely.

And that's the best part.

The Dems' conniption fits are not only futile...

They're also counterproductive, since it will only ultimately dissatisfy their own disillusioned base.

Or what's left of it...
continue to ask the question of these demofks, what is illegal about this gerrymanding exactly?
 
It would have required any gerrymandering already done be undone. Your answer is not factual.
so gerrymandering was already done? then how is what the repubs in tx doing illegal? Seems like gerrymandering has existed for 150 years.
 
15th post
The democrats can't squeeze any more seats if they tried, they are gerrymandered to the max.

Republicans need to squeeze every seat they can out of every red or purple state.
The dipshit Massachusetts governor is going to redistrict to retaliate against Texas despite the state having 100% Dimwinger representation even though 36% of the state voted for Trump.

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
1754922314950.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom