General Patton: The Pro-Trump

[surada]

Um, that's certainly not true. Most of them were still European colonies, and the ones that weren't stayed neutral.

For instance, the allies had to invade both Iraq and Iran to keep their leadership from joining the Axis.

That's not true. When exactly did the Allies invade Iraq and Iran?

 

[GMCGeneral]

He hated the bolsheviks above all else, and they were eventually proven to be a greater threat to humanity than even the nazis were. We should have stayed out of the way until Moscow fell and hitlers minions eradicated a few million commies before jumping into Europe. It would have ended up saving many millions more lives in the end and seriously containing the scourge of marxism around the world.

We certainly wouldn't be dealing with as many vacuous, dumb fuck leftist pieces of shit here today if the USSR was properly crushed in the 1940's.


.

This is why Truman should have listened to him and nuked Moscow and Stalingrad.

 

[DudleySmith]

This is why Truman should have listened to him and nuked Moscow and Stalingrad.

If Republicans hadn't sniveled and whined about military spending in 1920 we could have launched a real invasion and shut down Lenin's Revolution before it consolidated its hold, but like always they they hide under their beds and exhort the govt. to shoot down uppity domestic proles, then after Democrats take care of business they run around trying to take credit for the wins, and then immediately go back to what thery're doing now, bad imitations of Jane Fonda and the 1960's hippies and posting idiotic crap babbling about 'warmongers n stuff' and letting both REd China and Russia continue their imperialism until it all turns into a much bigger war, same as they did in the 20's and 30's.

 

[JoeB131]

That's not true. When exactly did the Allies invade Iraq and Iran?

Anglo-Iraqi War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[JoeB131]

This is why Truman should have listened to him and nuked Moscow and Stalingrad.

That's fucking retarded.

If a war broke out between the west and the USSR in 1946, the west would have lost, even with the few nukes we had.

The Soviet military by that point was a well-oiled machine that had much shorter supply lines. The British Empire was pretty much spent at that point. (It in fact, collapsed within a decade as all its colonies declared independence.)

You see, here's the big lie that Americans believe about World War II... that we were the ones who won it.

In fact, the Soviets did most of the heavy lifting in Europe while the US and UK dicked around in Italy and France. It was Soviet entry into the Pacific War that finally convinced the Japanese to surrender, more than Atom bombs did.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

A hypersensitive, flamboyant, hair sprayed, manicured, carefully-coiffed, makeup-caked, metrosexual New York City billionaire being compared with Patton.

All you can do at this point is watch and shake your head.

Just like you

 

[New York Jim]

Hitler was the immediate threat., the Russians didn't attack us, the Germans and Japanese did

Where did the Germans attack us? Idaho ?

In case you forgot, WWII in Europe began when Hitler and Stalin together invaded Poland and divided it between them. Prior to that Stalin

After Poland was divided up with Germany, Stalin made territorial demands to Finland. Helsinki refused, so Stalin invaded.

In 1940, the USSR occupied and illegally annexed Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.

Of course, Democrat President Rooselvelt became his friend, the same democrat who segregated blacks in the military and imprisoned Japanese because of their race.

 

[surada]

Leave it to a bed wetter to post heresay and bullshit from the NY Slimes that hid the facts of the Holocaust from the American public while it was actually happening.

The New York Times Downplayed The Holocaust

From the blog of Sheldon Kirshner at The Times of Israel

blogs.timesofisrael.com

Silence in the Storm: The New York Times' Coverage of the Holocaust During WWII

The New York Times, which began publishing in 1851, is regarded as one of the world's best newspapers. Its reputation for reliable, comprehensive coverage was secure by the early 1940s.

teachingamericanhistory.org

Then after that the same leftist "journalist" pukes want to make a big deal out of Patton not loving Jewsish people, and being "pro-nazi"? I'd say he deliberately pissed off the nazi prisoners if he forced them to bunk with the jews.

Either way, as bad as the nazis were, the bolshevik fucks like you were way worse. Patton hated them all and he was a patriot, you're a globalist traitor and should be thrown out of a helicopter into a North Korean rice paddy you commie piece of shit.


.

Most of the European Jews who went to Palestine before 1920 were Bolsheviks.

 

[GMCGeneral]

That's fucking retarded.

If a war broke out between the west and the USSR in 1946, the west would have lost, even with the few nukes we had.

The Soviet military by that point was a well-oiled machine that had much shorter supply lines. The British Empire was pretty much spent at that point. (It in fact, collapsed within a decade as all its colonies declared independence.)

You see, here's the big lie that Americans believe about World War II... that we were the ones who won it.

In fact, the Soviets did most of the heavy lifting in Europe while the US and UK dicked around in Italy and France. It was Soviet entry into the Pacific War that finally convinced the Japanese to surrender, more than Atom bombs did.

Of course your support for Communism would produce this lie you just posted.

 

[DudleySmith]

Where did the Germans attack us? Idaho ?

In case you forgot, WWII in Europe began when Hitler and Stalin together invaded Poland and divided it between them. Prior to that Stalin

After Poland was divided up with Germany, Stalin made territorial demands to Finland. Helsinki refused, so Stalin invaded.

In 1940, the USSR occupied and illegally annexed Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.

Of course, Democrat President Rooselvelt became his friend, the same democrat who segregated blacks in the military and imprisoned Japanese because of their race.

And another moron who doesn't know basic history, and a FDR conspiracy theory nutjob to boot. You have a lot of dumb ass 'friends' here who are also pissed off the Japanese and Germans lost WW II.

 

[New York Jim]

And another moron who doesn't know basic history . . . .

I beg your pardon BITCH?

My nutsack knows more than you. Do you even know what a nutsack is pussy boy?

 

[New York Jim]

Most of the European Jews who went to Palestine before 1920 were Bolsheviks.

Oh, an Arab anti-semite. Big surprise.
Where are you from, Fuckistan?

 

[DudleySmith]

I beg your pardon BITCH?

My nutsack knows more than you. Do you even know what a nutsack is pussy boy?

lol homo commie tries to be all butch n shit. You wearing your assless leather chaps and dog collar, stud?

 

[DudleySmith]

Most of the European Jews who went to Palestine before 1920 were Bolsheviks.

Don't know about most of them but yes, there were two large groups of Labor Zionists; they set up the two big kibbutzs there. There weren't many Orthodox zionists migrating then, outside of the aliyahs from Russia in the 19th Century, brought in the Turkish govt. to re-populate the area after the civil war with Egypt and build up the tax base. Most of the European and American Jewish migrants were secular Jews, not particularly religious.

 

[surada]

Don't know about most of them but yes, there were two large groups of Labor Zionists; they set up the two big kibbutzs there. There weren't many Orthodox zionists migrating then, outside of the aliyahs from Russia in the 19th Century, brought in the Turkish govt. to re-populate the area after the civil war with Egypt and build up the tax base. Most of the European and American Jewish migrants were secular Jews, not particularly religious.

Read Zionist Aspirations in Palestine, July 1920.

 

[surada]

Oh, an Arab anti-semite. Big surprise.
Where are you from, Fuckistan?

My family has been here since 1624. Dutch Reformed.

You're ignorant.

 

[Kondor3]

He told it like it is
He was rude when he had to get his point across
Sometimes he was politically incorrect
He was a fighter
The common man loved him
He was a winner when given the chance
He was the man you want at your side in a war

Was it Trump?
Was it Patton?

It was both!
Patton was the Proto Trump
And we need him to save America

The difference being that in the final analysis George S. Patton remained a patriot and upholder of the Constitution, whereas your Orange Baboon-God is not.

 

[Kondor3]

Read Zionist Aspirations in Palestine, July 1920.

Yep. Israel (including the West Bank and Gaza... Eretz Yisrael ) for the Jews... Jordan for the Palestinians.

 

[surada]

Yep. Israel (including the West Bank and Gaza... Eretz Yisrael ) for the Jews... Jordan for the Palestinians.

That's not what it's about.

 

[basquebromance]

Patton was a warrior superstar unprecedented in military history

Trump is a warrior conservative unprecedented in political history