Gen Mattis commits TREASON

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

... you know like the shrilary allowing the roooooshins to buy up all of our uranium deposits.

Wow. When you tards buy into a hoax, you REALLY buy into a hoax!

Well they think Trump's got a billion or two in the bank.

A billionaire doesn't have to have a billion in the bank. If that were the case, most of us would be hundredaires or thousandaires.

 

[Syriusly]

So after Trump leaves office- and foreign governments stop renting from Trump properties- that will be evidence of criminality?

Is this really the 'keen intellect' of Conservatives work?

You really can't think very well can you? The clinton foundation was supposed to be a CHARITABLE organization. Thus it shouldn't MATTER if the owners are in politics or not......or does that not compute to you? Are you such a simpleton that you can't understand the difference between a CHARITABLE organization, and how they are not supposed to be influenced by politics, and for profit businesses which certainly are.

Quite a BIG JUMP on your part to associate the Clinton Gobal initiative wind down and closing to criminality and not simply shutting it down because Bill Clinton wanted to wind it down...

He is getting pretty old and doesn't want to deal with it all anymore or the charity met its goals already or he doesn't need more money to build his Library.....

Not a jump at all. After she lost the election the donations stopped. They didn't just slow down, they STOPPED. So at that point there was no need to continue the farce.

It also seems that the love affair between Putin and Trump is fixing to be over as well. I find it interesting that Putin didn't do anything when Obama seized those 2 properties and kicked out all the diplomats. All Putin did was wait, because Trump appeared so willing to work with him. During the G20 meeting, Putin even stated that he wanted those properties back and sanctions lifted.

Congress decided that they didn't want Trump doing that, so they passed a bill to make the only ones able to lift sanctions is Congress, and that includes returning those 2 properties to Russia.

The day after that bill passed? Putin seized 2 properties America had in Russia, and said that there are a whole bunch that have to leave, because he's going to limit the number of American diplomats in Russia.

Seems that everything is starting to fall apart for Trump.

All of which points to no collusion at all between trump and pootin.

Or it could point to a falling out between two crooks.

 

[Syriusly]

there is nothing criminal about the Clinton foundation.

at some point the right has to start separating your hatred from reality.

If that were true the clinton global initiative would not have shut down. The only reason why it closed is because the people and governments who were buying influence figured out after her loss that they no longer needed to pay to play. That is as simple a piece of evidence for its criminality as you can get.

So after Trump leaves office- and foreign governments stop renting from Trump properties- that will be evidence of criminality?

Is this really the 'keen intellect' of Conservatives work?

You really can't think very well can you? The clinton foundation was supposed to be a CHARITABLE organization. Thus it shouldn't MATTER if the owners are in politics or not......or does that not compute to you? Are you such a simpleton that you can't understand the difference between a CHARITABLE organization, and how they are not supposed to be influenced by politics, and for profit businesses which certainly are.

Quite a BIG JUMP on your part to associate the Clinton Gobal initiative wind down and closing to criminality and not simply shutting it down because Bill Clinton wanted to wind it down...

He is getting pretty old and doesn't want to deal with it all anymore or the charity met its goals already or he doesn't need more money to build his Library.....

Not a jump at all. After she lost the election the donations stopped. They didn't just slow down, they STOPPED. So at that point there was no need to continue the farce.

They 'just stopped' when they closed down the Global Initiative- they have been slowing down before that.

 

[westwall]

If that were true the clinton global initiative would not have shut down. The only reason why it closed is because the people and governments who were buying influence figured out after her loss that they no longer needed to pay to play. That is as simple a piece of evidence for its criminality as you can get.

So after Trump leaves office- and foreign governments stop renting from Trump properties- that will be evidence of criminality?

Is this really the 'keen intellect' of Conservatives work?

You really can't think very well can you? The clinton foundation was supposed to be a CHARITABLE organization. Thus it shouldn't MATTER if the owners are in politics or not......or does that not compute to you? Are you such a simpleton that you can't understand the difference between a CHARITABLE organization, and how they are not supposed to be influenced by politics, and for profit businesses which certainly are.

Quite a BIG JUMP on your part to associate the Clinton Gobal initiative wind down and closing to criminality and not simply shutting it down because Bill Clinton wanted to wind it down...

He is getting pretty old and doesn't want to deal with it all anymore or the charity met its goals already or he doesn't need more money to build his Library.....

Not a jump at all. After she lost the election the donations stopped. They didn't just slow down, they STOPPED. So at that point there was no need to continue the farce.

They 'just stopped' when they closed down the Global Initiative- they have been slowing down before that.

Wrong. The donations were increasing all through the obummer Admin, they only slowed when her server problem spooked them, but then when the MSM chose to ignore the server issues the "donations" increased again, right up until they stopped.

 

[Syriusly]

a charity that ain't a charity? like the trump foundation?

If it is indeed a criminal organization like the clinton foundation then yes, absolutely. Lock 'em all up and throw away the key.

there is nothing criminal about the Clinton foundation.

at some point the right has to start separating your hatred from reality.

If that were true the clinton global initiative would not have shut down. The only reason why it closed is because the people and governments who were buying influence figured out after her loss that they no longer needed to pay to play. That is as simple a piece of evidence for its criminality as you can get.

So after Trump leaves office- and foreign governments stop renting from Trump properties- that will be evidence of criminality?

Is this really the 'keen intellect' of Conservatives work?

You really can't think very well can you? The clinton foundation was supposed to be a CHARITABLE organization. .

The Clinton Foundation is a charitable organization- which unlike the Trump Foundation- doesn't fund portraits of the Clinton's for the Clinton golf courses.

The Clinton Global Initiative was more of a think tank

Established in 2005 by President Bill Clinton, the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) convened global and emerging leaders to create and implement solutions to the world's most pressing challenges. Through CGI University, CGI America, CGI International and its flagship Annual Meeting, CGI brought together more than 200 sitting and former heads of state, more than 20 Nobel laureates, and hundreds of leading corporate CEOs, Presidents of foundations, Executive Directors of the most effective NGOs, and major philanthropists to commit to take action against these challenges. From 2005-2016, CGI members have made more than 3,600 Commitments to Action, which are improving the lives of over 435 million people in 180 countries.

 

[Syriusly]

So after Trump leaves office- and foreign governments stop renting from Trump properties- that will be evidence of criminality?

Is this really the 'keen intellect' of Conservatives work?

You really can't think very well can you? The clinton foundation was supposed to be a CHARITABLE organization. Thus it shouldn't MATTER if the owners are in politics or not......or does that not compute to you? Are you such a simpleton that you can't understand the difference between a CHARITABLE organization, and how they are not supposed to be influenced by politics, and for profit businesses which certainly are.

Quite a BIG JUMP on your part to associate the Clinton Gobal initiative wind down and closing to criminality and not simply shutting it down because Bill Clinton wanted to wind it down...

He is getting pretty old and doesn't want to deal with it all anymore or the charity met its goals already or he doesn't need more money to build his Library.....

Not a jump at all. After she lost the election the donations stopped. They didn't just slow down, they STOPPED. So at that point there was no need to continue the farce.

They 'just stopped' when they closed down the Global Initiative- they have been slowing down before that.

Wrong. The donations were increasing all through the obummer Admin, they only slowed when her server problem spooked them, but then when the MSM chose to ignore the server issues the "donations" increased again, right up until they stopped.

Donations starting going down from the time she announced her candidacy for President.

And continued to drop- but continued to come in- up until they closed down the Foundation.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Gen Mattis commits TREASON....When the potus gives an order, salute and say yes sir, General. (-:

Joint Chiefs: 'No modifications' to transgender policy from Trump tweet

Clearly you don't know the difference between "treason" and "insubordination." That said, last I heard, Mattis has said not that he won't implement the instruction but that he cannot implement it as given; thus there's also no insubordination afoot.

The Department of Defense is awaiting formal guidance from the White House as a follow-up to the Commander-in-Chief's announcement on military service by transgender personnel," Dana White said. "We will provide detailed guidance to the Department in the near future for how this policy change will be implemented.

"The Department will continue to focus on our mission of defending our nation and on-going operations against our foes, while ensuring all servicemembers are treated with respect," she added.​

Be that as it may, I don't know that a tweet constitutes a legal order in the sense of what it means for a POTUS to issue an order to generals or anyone else. I suspect it does not. A tweet seems more akin to a monarchical/dictatorial fiat. At best it is an announcement, not an order.

Of course, a tweet can be converted into a legal order. I don't know that Trump has or has not done so. There is also the matter of implementability. It doesn't matter much what someone orders if the instruction cannot be effected based on the information provided.

The White House will work with the Department of Defense and all of the relevant parties to make sure that we fully implement this policy moving forward and do so in a lawful manner. They are going to have to work out the details.
-- Sara Huckabee-Sanders​

The POTUS and his top appointees are not magi. They have no magic wand to wave and make their desires and instructions come to fruition.

 

[Syriusly]

Gen Mattis commits TREASON....When the potus gives an order, salute and say yes sir, General. (-:

Joint Chiefs: 'No modifications' to transgender policy from Trump tweet

Clearly you don't know the difference between "treason" and "insubordination." That said, last I heard, Mattis has said not that he won't implement the instruction but that he cannot implement it as given; thus there's also no insubordination afoot.

The Department of Defense is awaiting formal guidance from the White House as a follow-up to the Commander-in-Chief's announcement on military service by transgender personnel," Dana White said. "We will provide detailed guidance to the Department in the near future for how this policy change will be implemented.

"The Department will continue to focus on our mission of defending our nation and on-going operations against our foes, while ensuring all servicemembers are treated with respect," she added.​

Be that as it may, I don't know that a tweet constitutes a legal order in the sense of what it means for a POTUS to issue an order to generals or anyone else. I suspect it does not. A tweet seems more akin to a monarchical/dictatorial fiat. At best it is an announcement, not an order.

Of course, a tweet can be converted into a legal order. I don't know that Trump has or has not done so. There is also the matter of implementability. It doesn't matter much what someone orders if the instruction cannot be effected based on the information provided.

The White House will work with the Department of Defense and all of the relevant parties to make sure that we fully implement this policy moving forward and do so in a lawful manner. They are going to have to work out the details.
-- Sara Huckabee-Sanders​

The POTUS and his top appointees are not magi. They have no magic wand to wave and make their desires and instructions come to fruition.

To the Trumpsters- anyone not instantly obeying Trump's tweet is guilty of Treason.

Because like Trump - they have never read the Constitution.

 

[jc456]

Gen Mattis commits TREASON....When the potus gives an order, salute and say yes sir, General. (-:

Joint Chiefs: 'No modifications' to transgender policy from Trump tweet

Clearly you don't know the difference between "treason" and "insubordination." That said, last I heard, Mattis has said not that he won't implement the instruction but that he cannot implement it as given; thus there's also no insubordination afoot.

The Department of Defense is awaiting formal guidance from the White House as a follow-up to the Commander-in-Chief's announcement on military service by transgender personnel," Dana White said. "We will provide detailed guidance to the Department in the near future for how this policy change will be implemented.

"The Department will continue to focus on our mission of defending our nation and on-going operations against our foes, while ensuring all servicemembers are treated with respect," she added.​

Be that as it may, I don't know that a tweet constitutes a legal order in the sense of what it means for a POTUS to issue an order to generals or anyone else. I suspect it does not. A tweet seems more akin to a monarchical/dictatorial fiat. At best it is an announcement, not an order.

Of course, a tweet can be converted into a legal order. I don't know that Trump has or has not done so. There is also the matter of implementability. It doesn't matter much what someone orders if the instruction cannot be effected based on the information provided.

The White House will work with the Department of Defense and all of the relevant parties to make sure that we fully implement this policy moving forward and do so in a lawful manner. They are going to have to work out the details.
-- Sara Huckabee-Sanders​

The POTUS and his top appointees are not magi. They have no magic wand to wave and make their desires and instructions come to fruition.

To the Trumpsters- anyone not instantly obeying Trump's tweet is guilty of Treason.

Because like Trump - they have never read the Constitution.

Huh?

 

[Syriusly]

Gen Mattis commits TREASON....When the potus gives an order, salute and say yes sir, General. (-:

Joint Chiefs: 'No modifications' to transgender policy from Trump tweet

Clearly you don't know the difference between "treason" and "insubordination." That said, last I heard, Mattis has said not that he won't implement the instruction but that he cannot implement it as given; thus there's also no insubordination afoot.

The Department of Defense is awaiting formal guidance from the White House as a follow-up to the Commander-in-Chief's announcement on military service by transgender personnel," Dana White said. "We will provide detailed guidance to the Department in the near future for how this policy change will be implemented.

"The Department will continue to focus on our mission of defending our nation and on-going operations against our foes, while ensuring all servicemembers are treated with respect," she added.​

Be that as it may, I don't know that a tweet constitutes a legal order in the sense of what it means for a POTUS to issue an order to generals or anyone else. I suspect it does not. A tweet seems more akin to a monarchical/dictatorial fiat. At best it is an announcement, not an order.

Of course, a tweet can be converted into a legal order. I don't know that Trump has or has not done so. There is also the matter of implementability. It doesn't matter much what someone orders if the instruction cannot be effected based on the information provided.

The White House will work with the Department of Defense and all of the relevant parties to make sure that we fully implement this policy moving forward and do so in a lawful manner. They are going to have to work out the details.
-- Sara Huckabee-Sanders​

The POTUS and his top appointees are not magi. They have no magic wand to wave and make their desires and instructions come to fruition.

To the Trumpsters- anyone not instantly obeying Trump's tweet is guilty of Treason.

Because like Trump - they have never read the Constitution.

Huh?

The classic Trump voter comment when asked about what is in the Constitution.

 

[easyt65]

When the potus gives an order, salute and say yes sir, General. (-:

Joint Chiefs: 'No modifications' to transgender policy from Trump tweet

Classic Snowflake butt-hurt syndrome strikes again. According to numerous reports the issue is being reviewed, plans on how to implement are being worked, and implementation directives are being written.

 

[jc456]

Gen Mattis commits TREASON....When the potus gives an order, salute and say yes sir, General. (-:

Joint Chiefs: 'No modifications' to transgender policy from Trump tweet

Clearly you don't know the difference between "treason" and "insubordination." That said, last I heard, Mattis has said not that he won't implement the instruction but that he cannot implement it as given; thus there's also no insubordination afoot.

The Department of Defense is awaiting formal guidance from the White House as a follow-up to the Commander-in-Chief's announcement on military service by transgender personnel," Dana White said. "We will provide detailed guidance to the Department in the near future for how this policy change will be implemented.

"The Department will continue to focus on our mission of defending our nation and on-going operations against our foes, while ensuring all servicemembers are treated with respect," she added.​

Be that as it may, I don't know that a tweet constitutes a legal order in the sense of what it means for a POTUS to issue an order to generals or anyone else. I suspect it does not. A tweet seems more akin to a monarchical/dictatorial fiat. At best it is an announcement, not an order.

Of course, a tweet can be converted into a legal order. I don't know that Trump has or has not done so. There is also the matter of implementability. It doesn't matter much what someone orders if the instruction cannot be effected based on the information provided.

The White House will work with the Department of Defense and all of the relevant parties to make sure that we fully implement this policy moving forward and do so in a lawful manner. They are going to have to work out the details.
-- Sara Huckabee-Sanders​

The POTUS and his top appointees are not magi. They have no magic wand to wave and make their desires and instructions come to fruition.

To the Trumpsters- anyone not instantly obeying Trump's tweet is guilty of Treason.

Because like Trump - they have never read the Constitution.

Huh?

The classic Trump voter comment when asked about what is in the Constitution.

well it certainly is a classic response to someone who posts nonsense without a point.