Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

[syrenn]

Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 388 U. S. 1 :: Volume 388 :: 1967 :: Full Text :: US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

There was Supreme Court Precedent that the San Fran Judge Ignored...

Maybe that's because U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker is a Homosexual, eh?...

Dog in the Fight and all... ***** with your Objectivity a little?



peace...

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

 

[Modbert]

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

 

[ConHog]

Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 388 U. S. 1 :: Volume 388 :: 1967 :: Full Text :: US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

There was Supreme Court Precedent that the San Fran Judge Ignored...

Maybe that's because U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker is a Homosexual, eh?...

Dog in the Fight and all... ***** with your Objectivity a little?



peace...

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

Mal is just off base here. Even in Loving the SCOTUS did not declare that marriage was a constitutionally protected right, because it's not. PERIOD. It's a God given right, as correctly defined in Loving.

Now if you can't accept that fact then there is no need to further debate, No Syrenn I'm not saying YOU, I know you agree here. The fact is that the government is not obligated to recognize marriage, BUT once they choose to do so, they are obligated to extended that privilege to all. That is the true basis of Loving, and the basis on which barring gays from marrying is unconstitutional.

And that is why I advocate doing away government sanctioned marriage.

 

[mal]

Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 388 U. S. 1 :: Volume 388 :: 1967 :: Full Text :: US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

There was Supreme Court Precedent that the San Fran Judge Ignored...

Maybe that's because U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker is a Homosexual, eh?...

Dog in the Fight and all... ***** with your Objectivity a little?



peace...

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

And Homosexuals can't... EVER...



peace...

 

[Toome]

I don't see the institution of marriage as something that Big Government ought to interfere with. It's the entitlements, benefits and other similar privileges that extend from marriage that require constitutional scrutiny. Otherwise, don't give any tax credits to anyone just because they happen to be married and make it completely fair all the way across the board. Eliminate the requirement to withhold death notices until the next of kin is notified and just make it public information. See how far this can go?

As for marriage being based on our fundamental existence and survival, there are a huge number of marriages when the couples have absolutely no intention of having children or otherwise procreating. What happens with those marriages? Are they now illegal?

 

[syrenn]

Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 388 U. S. 1 :: Volume 388 :: 1967 :: Full Text :: US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

There was Supreme Court Precedent that the San Fran Judge Ignored...

Maybe that's because U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker is a Homosexual, eh?...

Dog in the Fight and all... ***** with your Objectivity a little?



peace...

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

And Homosexuals can't... EVER...



peace...

Cant EVER..what?

 

[mal]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300 research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.

And you know what they've found about Cycles of Abuse.

Oh yeah... Don't go Dismissin' the Source...



peace...

 

[mal]

"The incorrect stereotype of the gay man as a pedophile is one that has been medically and scientifically debunked," she said. "Heterosexual men were responsible for 74 percent of assaults on male victims and 77 percent of assaults on female victims, according to an American Academy of Pediatrics study (July 1994)."

However, Meyer says those statistics only prove her point -- a small number of the population is responsible for 26 percent of the assaults on boys.

"She overlooks there are a lot more heterosexuals than homosexuals," Meyer told Baptist Press. "People don't understand. You have to balance these numbers by overall population to see there's a greater incidence of abuse by gay men."

Homosexuals more likely to molest kids, study reports - (BP)



peace...

 

[syrenn]

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

And Homosexuals can't... EVER...



peace...

Cant EVER..what?

no answer?

 

[mal]

And Homosexuals can't... EVER...



peace...

Cant EVER..what?

no answer?

When Homosexuals **** it NEVER Results in having Kids...



peace...

 

[ConHog]

Cant EVER..what?

no answer?

When Homosexuals **** it NEVER Results in having Kids...



peace...

Well, a homosexual woman could theoretically use a sperm filled strap on to **** her wife and impregnate her. Thereby disproving your NEVER statement.

 

[mal]

no answer?

When Homosexuals **** it NEVER Results in having Kids...



peace...

Well, a homosexual woman could theoretically use a sperm filled strap on to **** her wife and impregnate her. Thereby disproving your NEVER statement.

A Homosexual Woman Produces Sperm?...

Men and Men and Women and Women are 100% incapable of Reproduction 100% of the time.

No Same Sex Coupling has EVER Resulted in Pregnancy because it's Impossible.



peace...

 

[Ravi]

Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 388 U. S. 1 :: Volume 388 :: 1967 :: Full Text :: US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

There was Supreme Court Precedent that the San Fran Judge Ignored...

Maybe that's because U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker is a Homosexual, eh?...

Dog in the Fight and all... ***** with your Objectivity a little?



peace...

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

And Homosexuals can't... EVER...



peace...

Sure they can.

Does anyone besides me think that mal would get a lot of pleasure using shock treatment on gay men?

 

[ConHog]

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

And Homosexuals can't... EVER...



peace...

Sure they can.

Does anyone besides me think that mal would get a lot of pleasure using shock treatment on gay men?

Now where has Mal EVER said anything even close to he would like to use shock treatment on gay men? You dishonest piece of shit. WE have people on this board advocating killing cops and you're nowhere to be found to comment but you have no problem telling lies about people wanting to kill Mexican children or harm gay men.

You're a piece of shit Ravi.

 

[rdean]

Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 388 U. S. 1 :: Volume 388 :: 1967 :: Full Text :: US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

There was Supreme Court Precedent that the San Fran Judge Ignored...

Maybe that's because U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker is a Homosexual, eh?...

Dog in the Fight and all... ***** with your Objectivity a little?



peace...

And?

Heterosexual Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." either.

You can **** and have kids WITHOUT being married. You can **** and not have kids and still not be married.

Mal is just off base here. Even in Loving the SCOTUS did not declare that marriage was a constitutionally protected right, because it's not. PERIOD. It's a God given right, as correctly defined in Loving.

Now if you can't accept that fact then there is no need to further debate, No Syrenn I'm not saying YOU, I know you agree here. The fact is that the government is not obligated to recognize marriage, BUT once they choose to do so, they are obligated to extended that privilege to all. That is the true basis of Loving, and the basis on which barring gays from marrying is unconstitutional.

And that is why I advocate doing away government sanctioned marriage.

There's no such thing as "gawd".

 

[rdean]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.

And you know what they've found about Cycles of Abuse.

Oh yeah... Don't go Dismissin' the Source...



peace...

Straight men are unwilling to admit they had their dick sucked by another dude.

 

[LuckyDan]

When Homosexuals **** it NEVER Results in having Kids...



peace...

Well, a homosexual woman could theoretically use a sperm filled strap on to **** her wife and impregnate her. Thereby disproving your NEVER statement.

A Homosexual Woman Produces Sperm?...

Men and Men and Women and Women are 100% incapable of Reproduction 100% of the time.

No Same Sex Coupling has EVER Resulted in Pregnancy because it's Impossible.



peace...

Link or I call bullshit

 

[rdean]

I once picked up the paper, the Chicago Tribune, and inside were two articles side by side.

The one on the left said, "17 year old BOY molested by 21 year old MAN".

The one on the right said, "Two 17 year old MEN raped a 23 year old College Coed".

I thought it was awfully odd that if a 17 year old has willing gay sex, they are poor molested boys.

But if a 17 year old boy has forced heterosexual sex, they are MEN. Isn't that odd?

 

[LuckyDan]

I once picked up the paper, the Chicago Tribune, and inside were two articles side by side.

The one on the left said, "17 year old BOY molested by 21 year old MAN".

The one on the right said, "Two 17 year old MEN raped a 23 year old College Coed".

I thought it was awfully odd that if a 17 year old has willing gay sex, they are poor molested boys.

But if a 17 year old boy has forced heterosexual sex, they are MEN. Isn't that odd?

I think it is awfully odd that the words molested and raped seemed to have escaped your attention.

 

[Father Time]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.

And you know what they've found about Cycles of Abuse.

Oh yeah... Don't go Dismissin' the Source...



peace...

Your source is a 404 error so why not?