Funny thing about those who want more gun control

[Chaussette]

Notice how the anti gun crowd does not go after the gun culture in Hollywood. Is there any call to action to get movies and shows to pull back on content that glorify gun violence? The answer is NO b/c many of the 1 % producers and writers are cronyists of The State and if they did not have violence in film to get even richer, they could not write checks to The Democrats.

Go ahead. Take the guns away. With that, ban books and media that glorify gun violence. See what happens. The Elite will be celebrating taking the 2nd Amendment from law abiding citizens while fighting for their 1st Amendment rights.

I don't rent movies with a gun on the cover. Gun on the cover = douche movie.

FYI. the 2nd is already restricted to a lot of people, and a lot of weapons are also restricted by the 2nd. And there's no mention that the 2nd should be restricted to law-abiding people.

 

[HomeInspect]

THE COYOTE PRINCIPLE
----------
Illinois

The Governor of Illinois is jogging with his dog along a nature trail.
A coyote jumps out and attacks the Governor's dog, then bites the
Governor.

The Governor starts to intervene, but reflects upon the movie "Bambi"
and then realizes he should stop because the coyote is only doing what
is natural.

He calls animal control. Animal Control captures the coyote and bills
the state $200 testing it for diseases and $500 for relocating it.

He calls a veterinarian. The vet collects the dead dog and bills the
State $200 testing it for diseases.

The Governor goes to hospital and spends $3,500 getting checked for
diseases from the coyote and on getting his bite wound bandaged.

The running trail gets shut down for 6 months while Fish & Game
conducts a $100,000 survey to make sure the area is now free of
dangerous animals.

The Governor spends $50,000 in state funds implementing a "coyote
awareness program" for residents of the area.

The State Legislature spends $2 million to study how to better treat
rabies and how to permanently eradicate the disease throughout the
world.

The Governor's security agent is fired for not stopping the attack.
The state spends $150,000 to hire and train a new agent with
additional special training re the nature of coyotes.

PETA protests the coyote's relocation and files a $5 million suit
against the state.
===========================================================

Texas

The Governor of Texas is jogging with his dog along a nature trail. A
coyote jumps out and attacks his dog.

The Governor shoots the coyote with his state-issued pistol and keeps
jogging. The Governor has spent $.50 on a .45 ACP hollow point
cartridge.

The buzzards eat the dead coyote.

And that, my friends, is why Illinois is broke and Texas is not.

 

[chikenwing]

They* argue that gun-related crime is so bad that the rights of thelaw abiding need further restriction, but then reject out of hand the notion that, because gun-related crime is so bad, people have a legiitmate need to arm themselves for self-defense.



* "They" does not mean every single one of these people; it denotes a significant proportion.

Once again, those who seek additional measures need to be compelled to justify such restrictions with objective, documented evidence – something gun rights advocates seem incapable of doing.

Instead, Second Amendment advocates initiate inane exchanges about ‘confiscation’ or ‘overthrowing tyranny,’ casting gun rights advocates in a negative light.

Oh bull shit,nice try.The recent Harvard study jumps up,but is ignored .

Studies are irrelevant,whats written in the constitution is all that matters,and the reason the 2nd is in there,those same reason's that you attempt to mock.

 

[Wildman]

Well, having weapons that can fire 30 or more rounds in under 10 seconds easily available to the crazies just makes such good sense.

It makes perfect sense when we have people like you running around electing gestapo types who would love nothing more to see my kind drop and die. I'll keep my three assault rifles and there is absolutely nothing you will ever be able to do about it.

you do NOT own three "assault" rifles, you own three semi-auto sporting rifles....., am i correct ?

 

[zeke]

Well, having weapons that can fire 30 or more rounds in under 10 seconds easily available to the crazies just makes such good sense.

It makes perfect sense when we have people like you running around electing gestapo types who would love nothing more to see my kind drop and die. [SIZE="4"]I'll keep my three assault rifles[/SIZE] and there is absolutely nothing you will ever be able to do about it.

you do NOT own three "assault" rifles, you own three semi-auto sporting rifles....., am i correct ?

LMFAO. OOPS. A gun nutter correcting another gun nutter for telling the truth. Priceless. "Am I correct?" Fuck no. The dude owns assault rifles. He said so. He has more gun knowledge than you do. He knows what an "assault rifle" is. He is not confused like you.
Funny shit. Best thing I have read on a gun nutter thread in a while.

 

[Wildman]

Notice how the anti gun crowd does not go after the gun culture in Hollywood. Is there any call to action to get movies and shows to pull back on content that glorify gun violence? The answer is NO b/c many of the 1 % producers and writers are cronyists of The State and if they did not have violence in film to get even richer, they could not write checks to The Democrats.

Go ahead. Take the guns away. With that, ban books and media that glorify gun violence. See what happens. The Elite will be celebrating taking the 2nd Amendment from law abiding citizens while fighting for their 1st Amendment rights.

that new movie with Stallone and Swartzenigger, two rabid anti gun assholes come to mind, if using guns in movie making makes them bundles of $$$$$ they are all for guns.

what really pisses me off is the pro gun crowd will go see this movie, which tells me they are FOR GUN CONTROL by supporting anti gun traitors with their dollars, then they argue with me that it is just "entertainment"..., BULLSHIT i say, you are supporting an actor/actress for their anti gun stance.

 

[editec]

They* argue that gun-related crime is so bad that the rights of thelaw abiding need further restriction, but then reject out of hand the notion that, because gun-related crime is so bad, people have a legiitmate need to arm themselves for self-defense.



* "They" does not mean every single one of these people; it denotes a significant proportion.

Yup... You ARE right about that in many cases.

 

[zeke]

One little mistake a gun nutter makes and you all abandon him.

He may need an "intervention". You know, to get him "right" with the other gun nutters.

Lets define "assault rifle". RC can go first. LMAO.

 

[Wildman]

It makes perfect sense when we have people like you running around electing gestapo types who would love nothing more to see my kind drop and die. [SIZE="4"[B]]I'll keep my three assault rifles[[/B]/SIZE][/B] and there is absolutely nothing you will ever be able to do about it.[/quote]

[B]you do NOT own three "assault" rifles, you own three semi-auto sporting rifles....., am i correct ?[/B][/QUOTE]

LMFAO. OOPS. A gun nutter correcting another gun nutter for telling the truth. Priceless. "Am I correct?" Fuck no. The dude owns assault rifles. He said so.[B][COLOR="Red"] He has more gun knowledge than you do. He knows what an "assault rifle" is. He is not confused like you.[/COLOR]
Funny shit. Best thing I have read on a gun nutter thread in a while.

i wish GOD had given you a brain NO !! he did not tell the truth he misrepresented what he has or forgot to add " " around "ASSAULT". where did he say he has more "gun knowledge" than i ? myself and several other "gun nuts" here have more gun knowledge than ALL you gun haters combined..., on or off this forum. ...

 

[zeke]

you do NOT own three "assault" rifles, you own three semi-auto sporting rifles....., am i correct ?

LMFAO. OOPS. A gun nutter correcting another gun nutter for telling the truth. Priceless. "Am I correct?" Fuck no. The dude owns assault rifles. He said so. He has more gun knowledge than you do. He knows what an "assault rifle" is. He is not confused like you.
Funny shit. Best thing I have read on a gun nutter thread in a while.

i wish GOD had given you a brain NO !! he did not tell the truth he misrepresented what he has or forgot to add " " around "ASSAULT". where did he say he has more "gun knowledge" than i ? myself and several other "gun nuts" here have more gun knowledge than ALL you gun haters combined..., on or off this forum. ...

Hey, write a coherent paragraph next time. What was it you were trying to say?

And what did you do with RC? Ban him from gun nut threads till he repents?

 

[zeke]

btw Wildman, I like guns just fine. I own guns. I even know (along with RC) what an "assault rifle" is,
You seem to be kinda stupid about that topic.

Assault weapons are kinda like porn. You know it when you see it. But not you eh? You've never looked at porn.

 

[Esmeralda]

I'm in favor of treating everyone like a potential criminal. Let's restrict everyone's liberty based on what someone might possibly could maybe someday potentially eventually do. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

This argument is ridiculous. That is what all laws do. That is why we have laws, because of the people who do bad things. If we followed your reasoning, we would have zero laws.

 

[LibertyLemming]

I'm in favor of treating everyone like a potential criminal. Let's restrict everyone's liberty based on what someone might possibly could maybe someday potentially eventually do. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

This argument is ridiculous. That is what all laws do. That is why we have laws, because of the people who do bad things. If we followed your reasoning, we would have zero laws.

We should have zero laws since clearly despite our laws we have bad things going on... in fact, it would appear that the most evil people in this world, usually end up being in a position to write and enforce laws.

 

[HomeInspect]

Funny. when someone supports the 2nd ammendment and may own a gun, they must be a "gun-nutter". I guess when someone supports a woman's right to choose, the must be an "Abortion - Nutter"?

 

[ClosedCaption]

 

[Steven_R]

I'm in favor of treating everyone like a potential criminal. Let's restrict everyone's liberty based on what someone might possibly could maybe someday potentially eventually do. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

This argument is ridiculous. That is what all laws do. That is why we have laws, because of the people who do bad things. If we followed your reasoning, we would have zero laws.

Then let's take it to its logical conclusion. You might start a cult based on child sexual abuse. Let's restrict your religious rights. You might write a ransom note or call for the violent overthrow of the government. We should go ahead and restrict your right to free speech. You might conspire to commit white collar crime. We should go ahead and get rid of your right of free association.

Now, you haven't actually done any of those things, but you might someday possibly could maybe eventually do them, so let's be proactive about the thing and just restrict you just in case.

Still on board with the idea that everyone is a potential criminal and should be treated as such?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Funny. when someone supports the 2nd ammendment and may own a gun, they must be a "gun-nutter". I guess when someone supports a woman's right to choose, the must be an "Abortion - Nutter"?

THis is because anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Interesting how none of the usual anti-gun loons actually address the issue put forth in the OP.
Hmm.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The only solution they have is taking weapons from the law abiding, well except their buddies, they will be licensed of course.

 

[Wildman]

btw Wildman, I like guns just fine. I own guns. I even know (along with RC) what an "assault rifle" is,
You seem to be kinda stupid about that topic.

Assault weapons are kinda like porn. You know it when you see it. But not you eh? You've never looked at porn.

you are a fucking idiot and a LIAR, prove you own a gun

read my tag line about what an assault weapon is and get a good bit educated..., OK ? until then you can remain stupid.