From the front page of the Washington Post

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
93,144
Reaction score
131,598
Points
3,615
1729957326502.webp



A. The editorial board endorses Harris, the owner, jeff bezos, will not allow them to say it.

B. It's sad that all it takes to break bezos is the thought of losing a little bit of his huge fortune.

Fuckling coward.
 
View attachment 1031721


A. The editorial board endorses Harris, the owner, jeff bezos, will not allow them to say it.

B. It's sad that all it takes to break bezos is the thought of losing a little bit of his huge fortune.

Fuckling coward.
No Big Deal.

News media should be Politically Neutral anyway.

Neutral... objective... non-partisan... tolerant of all reasonable political perspectives...


And, when a given media's editorial control strays too far from that.,.. owners can step in...

Which appears to be what happened here...

MEH.
 
Is WAPO going to blame Trump for not endorsing Harris? Either way it's not good news for Harris when the Washington paper fails to endorse a democrat for the first time in modern history.
 
No Big Deal.

News media should be Politically Neutral anyway.

Neutral... objective... non-partisan... tolerant of all reasonable political perspectives...


And, when a given media's editorial control strays too far from that.,.. owners can step in...

Which appears to be what happened here...

MEH.
Editorials are not news. They are opinion.

How do you not know this?
 
View attachment 1031721


A. The editorial board endorses Harris, the owner, jeff bezos, will not allow them to say it.

B. It's sad that all it takes to break bezos is the thought of losing a little bit of his huge fortune.

Fuckling coward.

When's the last time Kim Jong Un hurt America with a bad policy?
 
Editorials are not news. They are opinion.

How do you not know this?
In this case we're not talking about an Op-Ed... we're talking about throwing the whole weight of the organization behind a candidate...

How did you not know this?
 
View attachment 1031721


A. The editorial board endorses Harris, the owner, jeff bezos, will not allow them to say it.

B. It's sad that all it takes to break bezos is the thought of losing a little bit of his huge fortune.

Fuckling coward.
What’s weird is you claiming the board does when the Post says it doesn’t.

Very cultist
 
They shouldn't be endorsing anyone. That is a massively moronic thing for a paper to do.

The fact the board does not seem to get this just tells you the sorry ass state media is in these days.

The articles speak for themselves, endorsements are not necessary.
 
The Bezos move is pretty win/win. Some of those clown 'journalists' are quitting sparing the rest of from hearing their nonsense even if only second or third hand to begin with. Quitter Joe has started a movement!
 
What’s weird is you claiming the board does when the Post says it doesn’t.

Very cultist
Actually the board says it does.

Plus there's that pesky "C" word.

everybody3.webp
 
A. The editorial board endorses Harris, the owner, jeff bezos, will not allow them to say it.

B. It's sad that all it takes to break bezos is the thought of losing a little bit of his huge fortune.
C. They know she is going to lose.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom