French president Macron and wife brigitte sue candace owens for saying Brigitte is a man!!

[StatesRightsForever]

Sorry brigitte but in america we have free speech. That's why michelle obama has to tolerate similar allegations.

july 23 2025 French President Emmanuel Macron, and his wife Brigitte Macron, have filed a defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens over the far-right influencer’s “relentless and unjustified smear campaign” falsely accusing Brigitte of being born a man.

The 219-page defamation complaint, filed in Delaware state court Wednesday, accuses Owens of proliferating “demonstrably false” claims across her platforms, including in an eight-part podcast and on social media, designed to feed a “frenzied fan base” in “pursuit of fame”.

“These lies have caused tremendous damage to the Macrons,” according to the Macrons lawsuit, which names Owens as well her business entities, which are incorporated in Delaware.

“Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history — twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade,” the complaint alleges. “The result is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale. Every time the Macrons leave their home, they do so knowing that countless people have heard, and many believe, these vile fabrications. It is invasive, dehumanizing, and deeply unjust.”

Macrons sue Candace Owens over false claims French president’s wife is a man

Defamation lawsuit accuses Owens of spreading ‘grotesque narrative’ across platforms in ‘campaign of global humiliation’

www.independent.co.uk

 

[martybegan]

Sorry brigitte but in america we have free speech. That's why michelle obama has to tolerate similar allegations.

Macrons sue Candace Owens over false claims French president’s wife is a man

Defamation lawsuit accuses Owens of spreading ‘grotesque narrative’ across platforms in ‘campaign of global humiliation’

www.independent.co.uk

Discovery on this should be a hoot.

 

[g5000]

Sorry brigitte but in america we have free speech. That's why michelle obama has to tolerate similar allegations.

Unless it is libel or slander. Which in the case of Macron's wife and Obama's wife, it most certainly is.

Trump sues if someone hurts his feelings.

Michelle Obama has more class.

 

[martybegan]

Unless it is libel or slander. Which in the case of Macron's wife and Obama's wife, it most certainly is.

Trump sues if someone hurts his feelings.

Michelle Obama has more class.

Europe is at least trying to get over the trans nonsese.

Here, any Dem would have to admit that there is a set definition for a man or a woman.

 

[postman]

Sorry brigitte but in america we have free speech. That's why michelle obama has to tolerate similar allegations.

Macrons sue Candace Owens over false claims French president’s wife is a man

Defamation lawsuit accuses Owens of spreading ‘grotesque narrative’ across platforms in ‘campaign of global humiliation’

www.independent.co.uk

But Candice knows the statement to be false.
And she uttered it with the intent to cause mental anguish (malice)

So she's met the threshold of being liable for defaming a public figure.

 

[martybegan]

But Candice knows the statement to be false.
And she uttered it with the intent to cause mental anguish (malice)

So she's met the threshold of being liable for defaming a public figure.

DNA tests during discovery would prove it to be false.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Unless it is libel or slander. Which in the case of Macron's wife and Obama's wife, it most certainly is.
Michelle Obama has more class.

No - Big Mike knows she wouldn't win the case. too much evidence against her.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

DNA tests during discovery would prove it to be false.

HAHAHAHA. The "experts" will say what they are paid to say. If they say B is a woman, no one will believe them.

 

[postman]

Unless it is libel or slander. Which in the case of Macron's wife and Obama's wife, it most certainly is.

Trump sues if someone hurts his feelings.

Michelle Obama has more class.

Yeah. Trump is suing the newspaper, and owner and writers for $10 billion, for describing the birthday letter Trump sent to Epstein.
Now that's a case where discovery will be something to see. And since Trump started the lawsuit, he can't claim any kind of presidential privilege.

They'll most likely have the judge order a video conference if Trump won't sit in person.

 

[postman]

Europe is at least trying to get over the trans nonsese.

Here, any Dem would have to admit that there is a set definition for a man or a woman.

Even Jurassic park explained how all mammals start out female, and it's the gene producing male hormones that turns them male.
Well, genetics isn't perfect, and sometimes genes don't function right, and produce anomalies

 

[martybegan]

Even Jurassic park explained how all mammals start out female, and it's the gene producing male hormones that turns them male.
Well, genetics isn't perfect, and sometimes genes don't function right, and produce anomalies

Sorry, but once you are born, except for certain genetic anomalies, you are XX or XY.

XX woman, XY man.

That's it for 99.9% of the population.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

Sorry brigitte but in america we have free speech. That's why michelle obama has to tolerate similar allegations.

Macrons sue Candace Owens over false claims French president’s wife is a man

Defamation lawsuit accuses Owens of spreading ‘grotesque narrative’ across platforms in ‘campaign of global humiliation’

www.independent.co.uk

I always liked Candace Owens and don't really care whether Macron's "wife" is and always has been a woman, or a guy in drag, or a tranny. It's Macron's personal life.
What drew my attention beyond the original title of this Post, was the statement at the bottom of it: "Diversity is a horrible idea. Mixing races, languages and cultures always leads to disaster."
That is a very bigoted statement. Many mixed-race marriages do well. Love is love and if you fall in love with someone of a different race and they love you back. That is no disaster, but a good thing. As to languages, it would benefit us more to learn a language different from our own, especially for travel purposes. When foreigners travel to the United States for a vacation or on business, many have learned some basic phrases in order to make their trip more successful. Depending upon the culture, many are innocuous and have no negative impact on our society, but rather expand upon it. That mixing of cultures has given us a much larger experience in cuisines from those cultures, so it's a good thing.
Religion on the other hand, is another thing entirely. While most religions can get along to some degree such as Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Shinto's, Judaism, and Christians, one religion, Islam, is completely incompatible with all other religions, even Atheists. In reality, its teachings are steeped in the hatred of all other religions and peoples and remains stuck in a 7th century mentality. It should never be allowed to spread into non-Islamic nations, as violence against non-Muslims always follows and never stops.

 

[1srelluc]

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

But Candice knows the statement to be false.
And she uttered it with the intent to cause mental anguish (malice)

So she's met the threshold of being liable for defaming a public figure.

Not just that, she's alleging Mrs. Macron engaged in identity theft which is a crime. Falsely accusing someone of engaging in criminal activity is considered defamation per se meaning the damages do not have to be proven, they are presumed.

If nothing else, the plaintiffs (the Macrons) should be able to prevail on this claim.

When an Accusation of a Crime is Defamation Per Se​

The legal system treats certain types of statements as so inherently damaging that harm to the plaintiff’s reputation is presumed. This doctrine is known as “defamation per se.” Under this standard, the person who was defamed does not need to provide evidence of specific financial losses or other tangible harm. The law recognizes that the nature of the accusation itself is enough to cause injury.​

​

Accusing someone of committing a serious crime is a primary category of defamation per se. This includes allegations of offenses like theft, assault, or fraud. The reasoning is that an accusation of criminal conduct subjects a person to public contempt, making explicit proof of reputational damage unnecessary. The statement is considered defamatory on its face, and damages are presumed, though a plaintiff may still present evidence of specific losses to seek a higher award.

https://legalclarity.org/is-accusing-someone-of-a-crime-defamation/​

​

 

[PeterPilot]

Unless it is libel or slander. Which in the case of Macron's wife and Obama's wife, it most certainly is.

Trump sues if someone hurts his feelings.

Michelle Obama has more class.

If facts support the statements, it's neither libel nor slander. The facts are on Candace's side. Brigitte is a dude.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

After exposing brigitte, we next have to go after Big Mike. I'm gonna love that.

 

[g5000]

If facts support the statements, it's neither libel nor slander. The facts are on Candace's side. Brigitte is a dude.

Is lying and manufacturing bullshit worth showing the world you are a partisan idiot?

 

[g5000]

No - Big Mike knows she wouldn't win the case. too much evidence against her.

And that evidence is...what, idiot?

 

[Invisibleflash]

That blond thing is scarry!

 

[toobfreak]

Discovery on this should be a hoot.

Seriously. How can there be damages in a case like this? How hard can it be to just prove you are a woman?

Case closed.