"Free Palestine

[Challenger]

Is this the Palestinians minding their own business?



1929 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Are you trying to start history in the middle?

1834 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

or

1517 Hebron attacks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Albeit the latter did not involve Palestinians

Neither event did, 1834 Egyptian troops were the perpetrators, 1517 was an attack during an Ottoman Turk-Egyptian Mamluk war.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinians just so happened to be Zionists, that is their home. It was the arab muslim scum that invaded and attacked the Palestinians minding their own business

The Jews came from another continent. How can they have been "minding their own business"?

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

 

[Challenger]

The Jews came from another continent. How can they have been "minding their own business"?

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

The Palestinians also did not OWN Palestine .

"British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas"

Can you back this statement up ?

Arab Kingdom of Syria - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[toastman]

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

The Palestinians also did not OWN Palestine .

"British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas"

Can you back this statement up ?

Arab Kingdom of Syria - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

A kingdom that lasted four months...what's your point ?

 

[Phoenall]

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Of course you cannot quote any documents to back up all your blabber.

Do you want them all again so you can run away screaming because I have shown you to be a complete and utter moron again


Armistice of Mudros - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

UNTC

Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 12 August 1922

Where do they say what you said?

Quote the passages.

Read them and see, no good cherry picking when you need the full context, and I am sick of cherry picking for you the same passages only to have you repeatedly ask for them again.

 

[Phoenall]

The Palestinians just so happened to be Zionists, that is their home. It was the arab muslim scum that invaded and attacked the Palestinians minding their own business

The Jews came from another continent. How can they have been "minding their own business"?

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

LINKS ? ? ? ? ?

 

[Phoenall]

The Jews came from another continent. How can they have been "minding their own business"?

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Of course you cannot quote any documents to back up all your blabber.

Do you want them all again so you can run away screaming because I have shown you to be a complete and utter moron again


Armistice of Mudros - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

UNTC

Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 12 August 1922

Where do they say what you said?

Quote the passages.

Read them and see, no good cherry picking when you need the full context, and I am sick of cherry picking for you the same passages only to have you repeatedly ask for them again.

Because they don't say what you say they say.

That is why I asked for specific passages.

 

[montelatici]

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Arab Muslims" in 1896?

They were invited to settle by the LANDS LEGAL OWNERS with a view to creating a NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS. To this end they were granted mandate Palestinian citizenship. The only invaders were arab muslims that had no right to be there

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Muslim Arabs" in 1896? Who along with the Christian Arabs were around 95% of the population of Palestine?

 

[Phoenall]

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Of course you cannot quote any documents to back up all your blabber.

Do you want them all again so you can run away screaming because I have shown you to be a complete and utter moron again


Armistice of Mudros - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

UNTC

Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 12 August 1922

Where do they say what you said?

Quote the passages.

Read them and see, no good cherry picking when you need the full context, and I am sick of cherry picking for you the same passages only to have you repeatedly ask for them again.

Because they don't say what you say they say.

That is why I asked for specific passages.

They did the last 20 times I posted them, and you went silent for a few days. Nothing has changed the Mandate For Palestine still says that the land of Palestine is for the Jews. The surrender treaty still hands the land to the LoN and the list of LoN treaties still spell out that the arab muslims had their share.

 

[Phoenall]

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Arab Muslims" in 1896?

Britain never owned Palestine, so had no legal right to invite anyone to settle there against the will of the indigenous population, who were overwhelmingly Muslims. Every Jewish European setting foot in Palestine was, and still is an illegal immigrant.

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Muslim Arabs" in 1896? Who along with the Christian Arabs were around 95% of the population of Palestine?

And when are you going to produce the ottoman census records for that period, or do they show the arab muslim to be non existent across most of Palestine....................

 

[Challenger]

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Arab Muslims" in 1896?

TRy the LoN who did own the land after accepting the surrender of the Ottomans. Part of the deal was to hand over ownership of all the future Mandates, not just Palestine. The Ottomans invited the Jews to migrate and settle because the arab muslims refused to do so. Then the LoN invited the Jews to migrate and settle with the view to building a National Home. Now where did you get the fantasy about Britain owning the land ? And where did you get the fantasy that the arab muslims were indigenous to Palestine. Read the International laws of 1922 and see who were the illegal immigrants.

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Muslim Arabs" in 1896? Who along with the Christian Arabs were around 95% of the population of Palestine?

And when are you going to produce the ottoman census records for that period, or do they show the arab muslim to be non existent across most of Palestine....................

Probably when you produce all the links or citations you've been asked to produce and failed to do so. I won't hold my breath.

 

[Phoenall]

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Arab Muslims" in 1896?

Drivel.
There was no transfer of ownership. The Arabs declared a unitary state which the British and French subsequently suppressed to create a series of "mandates", so they could further their colonial agendas. You also conflate an Ottoman invitation to Jewish people expelled from Spain with some sort of fantasy "open house policy" centuries later. The League of Nations did not own Palestine, show us the title deeds or any treaty giving ownership of Palestine to the League of Nations.

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Muslim Arabs" in 1896? Who along with the Christian Arabs were around 95% of the population of Palestine?

And when are you going to produce the ottoman census records for that period, or do they show the arab muslim to be non existent across most of Palestine....................

Probably when you produce all the links or citations you've been asked to produce and failed to do so. I won't hold my breath.

Have done, but because they don't meet with your neo Marxist POV you ignore them

 

[Challenger]

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Arab Muslims" in 1896?

That is true. They took control but did no take possession.

which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves

that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations​

They are talking about the native inhabitants, not foreign colonists.

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Muslim Arabs" in 1896? Who along with the Christian Arabs were around 95% of the population of Palestine?

And when are you going to produce the ottoman census records for that period, or do they show the arab muslim to be non existent across most of Palestine....................

Probably when you produce all the links or citations you've been asked to produce and failed to do so. I won't hold my breath.

Have done, but because they don't meet with your neo Marxist POV you ignore them

OK, refresh my memory then, you don't need to provide the links, just the post numbers, dates you posted them and thread titles.

 

[Phoenall]

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Arab Muslims" in 1896?

Yep the Jewish native inhabitants not the non existent arab muslims.

You mean these "non-existent Muslim Arabs" in 1896? Who along with the Christian Arabs were around 95% of the population of Palestine?

And when are you going to produce the ottoman census records for that period, or do they show the arab muslim to be non existent across most of Palestine....................

Probably when you produce all the links or citations you've been asked to produce and failed to do so. I won't hold my breath.

Have done, but because they don't meet with your neo Marxist POV you ignore them

OK, refresh my memory then, you don't need to provide the links, just the post numbers, dates you posted them and thread titles.

Most threads on this board, and also on the ark, deep blue and sink or swim.

Now how about you refresh my mind and tell me why you have been banned from posting on at least of these boards ?

 

[Challenger]

You mean these "non-existent Arab Muslims" in 1896?


You mean these "non-existent Muslim Arabs" in 1896? Who along with the Christian Arabs were around 95% of the population of Palestine?

And when are you going to produce the ottoman census records for that period, or do they show the arab muslim to be non existent across most of Palestine....................

Probably when you produce all the links or citations you've been asked to produce and failed to do so. I won't hold my breath.

Have done, but because they don't meet with your neo Marxist POV you ignore them

OK, refresh my memory then, you don't need to provide the links, just the post numbers, dates you posted them and thread titles.

Most threads on this board, and also on the ark, deep blue and sink or swim.

Now how about you refresh my mind and tell me why you have been banned from posting on at least of these boards ?

Yup, trolling PUI or just off your meds.

The only one of those "boards" I've ever heard of is Sink or Swim, and I'm still waiting for my registration to be processed there by the Admins, so I've never been banned from any of them.

The only reason I found Sink or Swim, is because I Googled "Phoenall" and found you were a regular contributor there and from the exerpts availble, were being lambasted by the membership there as much as you are here, so curiosity got the better of me and I thought I'd register to see what they were saying about you.

 

[westwall]

ADDRESS the OP folks.

 

[member]

End the Occupation"

That was a bumper sticker I saw today.

So there are several Arab states in the region and only one Jewish state, but Israel is "occupying" Palestine?

I'm so sick of this Boo-hoo - occupying garbage.

As far as I'm concerned -- Israel UNOCCUPIED the Gaza Strip and turned into the Gaza Circus.

Infighting, continual terroristic activity, continuous corruption - get the hell out of here.

The Palestinians have proven they are INCAPABLE of running their own 'state.'


Fuck them and their stupid women-covering, terrorist thug existence.



They should all be transported to an island allllll unto themselves in the middle of the biggest ocean on the face of the earth.......along with the rest of those other fossils from yemen, afghanistan, Libya, THE CONGO, (yeah, the Congo, brrr) ETC - so they too can ALL be UNTO themselves in the middle of the ocean away from normal civilization.

 

[mrjingles]

End the Occupation"

That was a bumper sticker I saw today.

So there are several Arab states in the region and only one Jewish state, but Israel is "occupying" Palestine?

I'm so sick of this Boo-hoo - occupying garbage.

As far as I'm concerned -- Israel UNOCCUPIED the Gaza Strip and turned into the Gaza Circus.

Infighting, continual terroristic activity, continuous corruption - get the hell out of here.

The Palestinians have proven they are INCAPABLE of running their own 'state.'


Fuck them and their stupid women-covering, terrorist thug existence.



They should all be transported to an island allllll unto themselves in the middle of the biggest ocean on the face of the earth.......along with the rest of those other fossils from yemen, afghanistan, Libya, THE CONGO, (yeah, the Congo, brrr) ETC - so they too can ALL be UNTO themselves in the middle of the ocean away from normal civilization.

I think they're doing just fine killing each other in Iraq and Syria

 

[mrjingles]

Lets get back to the supposed occupation. When Jordan returns the east Bank we can discuss the west bank. Further, does anyone know that the Golan used to be part of Palestine?