“Trump "cannot be allowed to attack a woman who has factually described his sexual groping and be allowed to get off scot-free," argued Zervos attorney Mariann Meier Wang during the hour-long hearing before Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jennifer ”
Hilarious. She can accuse him of anything but when he says she lied he is attacking her.
Note there is no case against Trump for wrongdoing except saying she lied.
LOL
^^^ more evidence that conservatism is a cult.
You have no idea if she has evidence to support her claims or not, yet you pretend like she doesn’t. The courts will decide that, not you, if the case proceeds.
What’s the evidence against Franken beyond a photo of him not touching Tweeden?
And there you go with the Alex Jones 1776,1776 crap. Hey retard, defamation is not sexual herassment. Stop trying to sell it as that. Read your links before you post and you will not look dum.
LOL
You cultists are truly ******* insane.
Actually, what I said was,
”Umm... no, not all of Trump’s accusers went away. At least one of them is in the courts now.”
She is an accuser and it is in the courts right now, which you idiotically denied
even after reading the article.
Not to mention, if the case proceeds to trial, which I believe is likely, for her to prevail in her defamation suit, she will have to prove her allegations of sexual harassment.
Too bad Franken never got his day in court like that.