Dragon
Senior Member
- Sep 16, 2011
- 5,481
- 588
- 48
He flat-out tells you he's distorting history to serve his agenda.
No, that's not what your quoted passage means. All I've read by him was his People's History of the United States, but in that he misstates no facts. All of the factual statements he makes in it one can find in other, more conventional historians as well. He does emphasize different facts than those conventional historians would, and concentrate on different aspects of events from the past -- all of which really happened. And THAT is what he meant.