CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,202
- 78,446
- 2,645
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. I asked you. What are the 2 sources that all network news flows from?You tell me.
And I liked Roger Mudd.I do remember before Fox News.. I liked Walter Cronkite.
It was facts I was asking for. Facts you do not know. Obviously.I am not your slave, The Duke . Nor your mind reader.
I can only guess what you might believe. One might be the government, the “Deep State” or whatever you call it. The other, perhaps, are corporate elites.
But I don’t know where your particular fetish or conspiracy theory may take you. Just two sources, eh?
You'll get nothing, retard. You're a low-level troll.I await your words of wisdom with baited breathe!![]()
Lots on if you're not insane and think Tucker is entertaining.american tv is a colossal fail at least tucker was interesting, so little else is
Tucker was so great the left HAD to cancel him...he was killng the poor dearsLots on if you're not insane and think Tucker is entertaining.
Obviously you're ignorant of where the news comes from today.What a stupid coward The Duke is, challenging me and running away without even trying to make himself clear. He is evidently afraid he will make himself look stupid if he tries to explain his ridiculous theory that “All the Network News comes from only 2 sources.”
If The Duke really knew the first thing about the history of media criticism or how network news media has evolved or works today (a complex subject!) he would have recognized my reference to the famous 1988 book “Manufacturing Consent,” written by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky.
Of course theirs was not even the first study of how corporate media — and its choices about what is news and what is unimportant — serve social functions that ultimately themselves serve predominantly elite interests in society. I read their earlier book written just after the Vietnam War as well. “Manufacturing Consent” was revised and updated several times as the Cold War faded and Terrorism became a news and foreign policy obsession, and finally the internet changed everything.
Of course many other theoretical frameworks and detailed analysis of giant media corporations have been advanced since, some academic and many popular.
Here is a Wikipedia summary of “Manufacturing Consent”:
Manufacturing Consent - Wikipedia
***
P.S. I’m no longer waiting around “with bated breath” for the Duke to enlighten us. That obviously will never happen.
Besides, it’s past my bedtime!
![]()
It makes sense because they have a ,$2.5bn suit coming.Umm..yeah, guy.
"The Murdochs" ditching Tucker is as if NBC ditched Johnny Carson in his prime.
It makes zero sense as far abn s ratings go. If ratings are dollars, it makes zero sense from a business standpoint as well.
I have known FOX is less reliable than CBS news for..how long since 2014?
9 years. Yeah, Obama was president when I researched about news and the networks and the AP and Reuters and all that.
You are literally more dumb than a box of rocks. The left has nothing to do with Fox.Tucker was so great the left HAD to cancel him...he was killng the poor dears
And Tucker is at the crux of it?It makes sense because they have a ,$2.5bn suit coming.
You are literally more dumb than a box of rocks. The left has nothing to do with Fox.
You don't keep the dude that cost you $3bn large plus the sex harassment suits.And Tucker is at the crux of it?
Them canning him will determine whether they win a lawsuit or not?
That..makes no sense to me.
Maybe you can enlighten me?
The only thing he's cost them so far (for certain) is a #1 prime time spot from lack of being there.You don't keep the dude that cost you $3bn large plus the sex harassment suits.
There are only so many shitty my pillow revenue dollars you can get.
And an $800mm settlement plus whats coming.The only thing he's cost them so far (for certain) is a #1 prime time spot from lack of being there.![]()