Forget Chamberlain

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
China, and Russia are increasing their military budgets while America is downsizing its military capabilities, and that is not including Islam that already declared war on America and former Christian countries. I say “former” because Socialism has replaced Christianity insofar as cultures and government control go.

Instead of repeatedly referring to Neville Chamberlain’s capitulation, spend more time comparing today with the consequences of Hitler rearming Germany, while Japan was a military dictatorship. The same thing is happening again. America grows weaker while enemies grow stronger and more aggressive. Tragically, the same touchy-feely freakazoids types are spewing the same garbage they spouted in the 1930s. It is worse now, because America was not in the League of Nations back then, yet today’s freaks insist that the United Nations gave us a better world!



NOTE: If Axis powers in the 1930s had the petroleum wealth that Islam has the Axis powers might have won WWII. Today, Islamic countries are funding their unconventional armies with oil money at the same time petroleum money is buying the technology that is building a traditional military machine.

The more that America’s allies like England spend on parasites at the expense of their militaries the more vulnerable America and the free world become:


Spending on third world aid is on course to be greater than the defence budget within 15 years, according to official research, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

The forecast from the House of Commons library show at current rates Britain’s international development budget will exceed military spending by 2030/31.

Official: Third world aid spending to outstrip defence budget within 15 years
By Christopher Hope, Chief Political Correspondent
10:00PM GMT 02 Mar 2015

Official Third world aid spending to outstrip defence budget within 15 years - Telegraph

Finally, a word or two about Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress later this morning.

A disarmed Israel does not stand a chance. Taqiyya the Liar’s foreign policy demands that Israel not defend itself. Do not fight back and the United Nations will take care of everything for you. That is same policy the scum in the White House implemented in this country.

I do not know what Netanyahu is going to say, but I hope he reminds Congress that a nuclear Iran leaves Israelis no choice but to kill the people who want to kill Americans. I would not define Israelis as mercenaries, but they sure as hell are suckers if they believe anything this administration says.
 
Last edited:
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
China, and Russia are increasing their military budgets while America is downsizing its military capabilities, and that is not including Islam that already declared war on America and former Christian countries.
Here it comes:

The Pentagon's proposed budget for FY2016 has been released, and over at the Washington Post, they are proposing that "Obama's new defense budget looks like Reagan's."

No, it does not.

The U.S. defense budget has declined continually in real dollar terms since Obama took office. In 2008, the budget was US $760 billion in constant 2016 dollars. The FY2016 budget is proposed at only US $585 billion – a 23-percent reduction in just eight years.

XXXXX

Defense spending in the rest of the world is rising rapidly – notably in adversaries throughout Eurasia and the Middle East – while American expenditures are dropping fast.

XXXXX

Perilous times lie ahead in the West.

March 4, 2015
Falling behind in the global arms race
By Sierra Rayne

Blog Falling behind in the global arms race
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
128,398
Reaction score
13,690
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
The United States STILL spends more on defense than the next ten countries combined, and 8 of those countries are Allies.

The real reason why we won't go to war with China? Why piss off your best customer?
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
214,459
Reaction score
40,322
Points
2,190
China, and Russia are increasing their military budgets while America is downsizing its military capabilities, and that is not including Islam that already declared war on America and former Christian countries.
Here it comes:

The Pentagon's proposed budget for FY2016 has been released, and over at the Washington Post, they are proposing that "Obama's new defense budget looks like Reagan's."

No, it does not.

The U.S. defense budget has declined continually in real dollar terms since Obama took office. In 2008, the budget was US $760 billion in constant 2016 dollars. The FY2016 budget is proposed at only US $585 billion – a 23-percent reduction in just eight years.

XXXXX

Defense spending in the rest of the world is rising rapidly – notably in adversaries throughout Eurasia and the Middle East – while American expenditures are dropping fast.

XXXXX

Perilous times lie ahead in the West.

March 4, 2015
Falling behind in the global arms race
By Sierra Rayne

Blog Falling behind in the global arms race
In 2008 we were heavilly involved in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars
In 2016 we are mostly removed from both conflicts

Wouldn't you expect a 23 percent reduction after ending two wars?
 
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
In 2008 we were heavilly involved in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars
In 2016 we are mostly removed from both conflicts

Wouldn't you expect a 23 percent reduction after ending two wars?
To rightwinger: Just the opposite. The war is far from over. Put Islam in perspective by comparing it to the Cold War against Communism. Increasing the military budget eventually defeated the Soviet Union under President Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, but it did not end the war as Democrats claimed. There is not a chance that reducing the military budget will defeat Islam.

Basically, America & Allies must fight two enemies because neither one has been defeated. Indeed, Communist China replaced the Soviet Union.

Serendipitously, the Soviet Union imploding gave Democrats an excuse to slowly dismantle this country’s “peacetime” military at the same time it gave them justification to direct vast sums to welfare state(s) —— domestic and foreign.

In addition, Communists flocked to the Environmental Movement that grew in leaps and bounds. If there is a so-called 'peace benefit' resulting from the Soviet Union’s collapse, environmental freakazoids are the only ones who enjoy it. That is why they secretly call it a Cold War benefit.

Incidentally, if there is no war how come Democrats want more taxes? They sure as hell will not spend the money on a military needed to defend this country more now than ever before.

Finally, thanks to top Democrats like John Kerry, America snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in three major battles; Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Before long, a fourth lost battle will be added to the others—— the rebirth of the Soviet Union.
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
214,459
Reaction score
40,322
Points
2,190
Military budgets are based on mission and threats

We no longer have the mission to nation build in Iraq and Afghanistan
The threat of isolated terrorist groups does not warrant a war time military strength
 
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
Military budgets are based on mission and threats

We no longer have the mission to nation build in Iraq and Afghanistan
The threat of isolated terrorist groups does not warrant a war time military strength
To rightwinger: Victory in war is the mission not a threat.

Nation-building is always a mistake. The phrase is derived from President Wilson’s evil philosophy “Peace Without Victory.” Defeat the enemy but not totally. Once defeated, go about the business of nation-building.

Do not confuse nation-building with total victory in WWII. Example: The Marshall Plan was considered necessary in order to contain the Soviet Union. Today, Europe is a continent of Socialist nations thanks to the Marshall Plan. I call it nation-building at its worst.

Incidentally, compare Wilson’s Peace Without Victory speech:



to Netanyahu’s speech yesterday:


One thing is clear. Should Iran defeat Israel there will be no Peace WITH Victory. Ditto should Communists, or Muslims, defeat America in war or peace.

Give it up. Implying that Muslim terrorists are criminals no longer sells if it ever did. They are enemy combatants engaging in a well-funded war. You and the White House are the only ones still pushing the ‘criminal defense’ war policy.
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
214,459
Reaction score
40,322
Points
2,190
The US needs to abandon its role as worldwide policeman

Sometimes, its none of our business
 
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
The US needs to abandon its role as worldwide policeman

Sometimes, its none of our business
To rightwinger: Self-defense has to be our business as a matter of survival. Being a global meal ticket for parasites is never our business.
 
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
A disarmed Israel does not stand a chance. Taqiyya the Liar’s foreign policy demands that Israel not defend itself. Do not fight back and the United Nations will take care of everything for you. That is same policy the scum in the White House implemented in this country.
I know why it is important to Americans for Netanyahu to win on Tuesday. I am not well-versed in the ins and outs of Israel’s elections. No matter. I cannot go wrong throwing in with Judi:

Up until the March 3 address, Netanyahu was leading election polls . The day after the address, he began to tank in the polls.

Why are we only now hearing about a “powerful” U.S. Senate INVESTIGATORY committee launching an 11th-hour BIPARTISAN probe into an American nonprofit’s funding of efforts to oust Netanyahu out of office as Israel’s courageous Prime Minister?

The Obama administration’s State Department’s recent, $350,000, taxpayer-funded grants were already at the disposal of the nonprofit in time for election meddling. The Israel general election is on Tuesday. The leftist zionists are ahead in the polls.

XXXXX

. . . not all of Obama’s spiteful threats are empty ones.​

Judi details the importance of Netanyahu’s victory next Tuesday for anyone who thinks it means nothing to us. Most notably, this little taste should will give you enough to question the UN’s ugly hand pulling the strings:

. . . western leaders entrusted to protect the sovereignty of the nations they were elected to serve, are, just like a fawning Obama, take their marching orders from the UN to which they pay their absolute allegiance.

The takedown of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by American Congress
By Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives March 15, 2015

The takedown of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by American Congress
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top