For you fans of Charles Darwin, check this video out

Robert W

Don't tread on me. Be kind to our president.
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
33,445
Reaction score
17,109
Points
1,788
Location
Redmond Oregon, USA
Peter Robinson of Stanford University presents excellent discussions you should explore.
He deals with topics many of you find very interesting. This one discusses Charles Darwin and a good may here do the same thing from time to time.
Hope you learned a few more things. This is discussed by very powerful important scientists.

Bear in mind, knowledge takes hour and hours to obtain.

 
31j7k5.jpg
 
At the end of the day… it makes absolutely no difference what you believe regarding the origin of life in The Universe.

Life is here … it will continue to be here in all its billions of forms until it isn’t here any longer and there is nothing left to believe.

It’s like arguing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin without proving the existence of pins.
 
Do I have to waste an hour and a half only to find out there is no experiment that demonstrates the existence of God? ... just how hard is it to refute the natural philosophy being passed around 200 years ago ??? ...

Bear in mind, knowledge takes hour and hours to obtain.

There's your mistake ... it takes years and years of formal education to gain knowledge ... especially the biochemistry that explains evolution ...
 
Peter Robinson of Stanford University presents excellent discussions you should explore.
He deals with topics many of you find very interesting. This one discusses Charles Darwin and a good may here do the same thing from time to time.
Hope you learned a few more things. This is discussed by very powerful important scientists.

Bear in mind, knowledge takes hour and hours to obtain.


Evolution is science. Creationism is not.

But hey, for those of you who believe in magic....:)
 
Do I have to waste an hour and a half only to find out there is no experiment that demonstrates the existence of God? ... just how hard is it to refute the natural philosophy being passed around 200 years ago ??? ...



There's your mistake ... it takes years and years of formal education to gain knowledge ... especially the biochemistry that explains evolution ...
Your comment:

"Do I have to waste an hour and a half only to find out there is no experiment that demonstrates the existence of God?"

There is no experiment that demonstrates life came from a primordial pool either.
 
Your comment:

"Do I have to waste an hour and a half only to find out there is no experiment that demonstrates the existence of God?"

There is no experiment that demonstrates life came from a primordial pool either.
I'm Serious
 
There's your mistake ... it takes years and years of formal education to gain knowledge ... especially the biochemistry that explains evolution ...
All evolution covers is change of all forms of life. Factually evolution is not connected at all to, let's say God in Heaven.
 
Your comment:

"Do I have to waste an hour and a half only to find out there is no experiment that demonstrates the existence of God?"

There is no experiment that demonstrates life came from a primordial pool either.

Have I asked you to waste an hour an a half watching a video? ... there's the difference ... I'm not pushing my religion down your throat ... but if you insist, your local university should have this publication and you should be able to conduct this experiment yourself ... "Respiration in blue-green algae" -- Biggins 1969 ...

Why you think Charles Darwin claimed this? ... Darwin was a philosopher, I don't think he understood chemistry well enough to discuss the Modern synthesis (20th century) - Wikipedia ...
 
All evolution covers is change of all forms of life. Factually evolution is not connected at all to, let's say God in Heaven.

God is a spiritual being ... matters of the flesh are vanity and vexation of spirit ... c.f. Ecclesiastes ... a far better hour and a half spent ...
 
Peter Robinson of Stanford University presents excellent discussions you should explore.
He deals with topics many of you find very interesting. This one discusses Charles Darwin and a good may here do the same thing from time to time.
Hope you learned a few more things. This is discussed by very powerful important scientists.

Bear in mind, knowledge takes hour and hours to obtain.


Guy’s another right wing dooshbag

Pffft
 
At the end of the day… it makes absolutely no difference what you believe regarding the origin of life in The Universe.
Unless you're a scientist. Or a doctor. For example.

I wouldn't want a doctor that rejects the laws of physics and the basis of biology.
 
All evolution covers is change of all forms of life. Factually evolution is not connected at all to, let's say God in Heaven.
Why? Is God too stupid to have designed evolution?

Or too powerless?

Or is it both?
 
15th post
God is a spiritual being ... matters of the flesh are vanity and vexation of spirit ... c.f. Ecclesiastes ... a far better hour and a half spent ...
Evolution the science is not remotely connected to GOD at all. Evolution does not even deal with creation, called abiogenesis.
 
Have I asked you to waste an hour an a half watching a video? ... there's the difference ... I'm not pushing my religion down your throat ... but if you insist, your local university should have this publication and you should be able to conduct this experiment yourself ... "Respiration in blue-green algae" -- Biggins 1969 ...

Why you think Charles Darwin claimed this? ... Darwin was a philosopher, I don't think he understood chemistry well enough to discuss the Modern synthesis (20th century) - Wikipedia ...
A cell is already life, fool.
 
Back
Top Bottom