for or against Candace Owens?

for or against her?

  • for

  • against

  • neutral


Results are only viewable after voting.
For whatever reason, there are more than a few people from other countries here who participate in topics pertaining to America and her politics. I'm not sure why that is.

It may or may not be true but, as I said, who gives a shit? I simply cannot fathom why Owens chose something like this to take a public stand on. It is an entirely personal matter for the Macrons and has no bearing on America or American politics.
i have no idea where candace stands politically, and i dont care.

I am only opposed to her insults against Brigitte Macron.
 
i have no idea where candace stands politically, and i dont care.

I am only opposed to her insults against Brigitte Macron.
^^^ thinks 30 year old teachers hooking up with 15 year old students is cool.

Democrats = perverted freaks
 
Zebra does. Even though he is "from the Black Forest" a region of Germany, he is obsessed with this American political commentator. This is at least his third thread on the topic and he participates in other threads.

I get the American left's hatred of a black woman who dares not to toe the Democrat or "not Democrat" line. Why it means so much to a German has me scratching my head.

The truth of it is important, because if it is true, then the idea that Owens is a conspiracy theorist pushing a false narrative goes out the window.
i dont care about where owens stands politically.
did not know her name before she attacked Brigitte Macron
thats all
 
The truth of it is important, because if it is true, then the idea that Owens is a conspiracy theorist pushing a false narrative goes out the window.
I think Candace has had some valid questions on Kirk's murder and murderer that have been left unanswered by law enforcement authorities, which leaves openings for her and a thousand of others to fill in the blanks, with their own theories....

Sometimes I wonder if some kind of deep state behind the scenes law enforcement authority leaves a trail of unanswered questions and anomalies on purpose, to allow these conspiracies to form and exist and go rampant, because the real truth can be masked and hidden, in the conspiracy chaos that ensues?
 
For whatever reason, there are more than a few people from other countries here who participate in topics pertaining to America and her politics. I'm not sure why that is.

It may or may not be true but, as I said, who gives a shit? I simply cannot fathom why Owens chose something like this to take a public stand on. It is an entirely personal matter for the Macrons and has no bearing on America or American politics.
You make it sound like Owens is going on and on about this. She mentioned it in a podcast. Nobody but the Macrons made an issue of it and now posters on here are obsessing.

She is being sued for free speech, so of course she is going to talk about that. Not being french, she is not genetically predisposed to automatically surrender.

In France, it is literally a crime to criticize Macaron. Praise Allah, we don't have those kind of laws here. That is why the Macrons are taking the back door into the justice system, among other things.
 
Seymour Flops

i have played the video now

this Candance is too stupid to pronouce Brigitte Macron correctly
i wonder why anybody should listen to her
But she’s smart enough to know that her audience is dumb enough to take makde up bullshit as fact. Particularly when she’s attacking someone who is prominent in a country most of her audience couldn’t find on a map.
 
btw ....

those ridiculous attacks against the First Lady of France made news in Germany, too.
thats when i first read about Mrs Owens.

had no idea who she was and that so many here seem to follow her.
 
You make it sound like Owens is going on and on about this. She mentioned it in a podcast. Nobody but the Macrons made an issue of it and now posters on here are obsessing.

As I understand it, it was an entire series of podcasts which comprised six or seven episodes with a later episode coming out after the lawsuit was filed. This suggests to me that it was a little more than "mentioning" it in a podcast.
She is being sued for free speech, so of course she is going to talk about that. Not being french, she is not genetically predisposed to automatically surrender.

In France, it is literally a crime to criticize Macaron. Praise Allah, we don't have those kind of laws here. That is why the Macrons are taking the back door into the justice system, among other things.
I don't know about the laws regulating such things between the two countries but I will say that if it is truly a case of free speech then I hope Candace wins or gets it thrown out.

Also, it appears Owens' podcasts were based on a book of the same name ("Becoming Brigitte") by a French journalist. This does make me wonder why the Macrons did not sue the author before this.

Beyond all this, my feelings are that I think the right might be losing sight of its goals regarding transgenderism. It was never about transgenderism as an ideology or lifestyle choice, it was about the ridiculous demands the culture was unfairly asking of the rest of us such as having to guess among 50+ genders they arbitrarily devised along with their attendant nonexistent pronouns. It is for this reason I think the podcasts were a waste of time and did not directly address the real concerns people have about transgenderism.
 
btw ....

those ridiculous attacks against the First Lady of France made news in Germany, too.
thats when i first read about Mrs Owens.

had no idea who she was and that so many here seem to follow her.

It was a ridiculous fake claim. The sort of BS that travels well in tabloid world and in sewers like X
 
yes, pure silly sensationalism ...
Why are you spending so much of your time on pure silly sensationalism?

Would your opinion of the Macrons change significantly if you found out that Owens, claims are true?
 
As I understand it, it was an entire series of podcasts which comprised six or seven episodes with a later episode coming out after the lawsuit was filed. This suggests to me that it was a little more than "mentioning" it in a podcast.

I don't know about the laws regulating such things between the two countries but I will say that if it is truly a case of free speech then I hope Candace wins or gets it thrown out.

Also, it appears Owens' podcasts were based on a book of the same name ("Becoming Brigitte") by a French journalist. This does make me wonder why the Macrons did not sue the author before this.

Beyond all this, my feelings are that I think the right might be losing sight of its goals regarding transgenderism. It was never about transgenderism as an ideology or lifestyle choice, it was about the ridiculous demands the culture was unfairly asking of the rest of us such as having to guess among 50+ genders they arbitrarily devised along with their attendant nonexistent pronouns. It is for this reason I think the podcasts were a waste of time and did not directly address the real concerns people have about transgenderism.
Very good points.

I have to wonder if she did one podcast, and then saw how much consternation it was causing and how her viewership was going up.And decided to have more.

If so, the lawsuit is doing her a big favor.
 
she says many strange things

I dont believe her.
It's not a question of one way or the other. Like everyone, she says some questionable things and some which are not questionable. It is our job to filter it all out and believe what we think is right and not believe other things.
 
Why are you spending so much of your time on pure silly sensationalism?

Would your opinion of the Macrons change significantly if you found out that Owens, claims are true?
My opinion or the Macrons would not be affected at all by the BS from some right wing BS artist like Owens.
 
15th post
My opinion or the Macrons
What IS your opinion about a person who groomed a fifteen year old when they were 39?
would not be affected at all by the BS from some right wing BS artist like Owens.
Um . . . thank you for spending your time talking about Owens?

There are many threads about her for a person of no consequence that nobody cares about.
 
Back
Top Bottom