Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 95,066
- 67,854
- 3,645
Yes, the links you provided say exactly what I said: Trump's crowd was 1/3 the size of Obama's.wow,an "image expert"!
Are you also a crowd expert? They estimated Trump's crowd was about 1/3 the size of Obama's.
Yes, many documents these days are in fact electronic "images." And again, I have the original live video feed, you are comparing Obama's first, much larger crowd where they took down the barricades greatly facilitating people coming in vs. an image taken before Trump's crowd reached its fullest.
Trump's guesstimate may have been off, but there are websites which list the crowd sizes and Trump's was certainly competitive and well within the norm for inaugurations and not the pathetic embarrassment that almost two years later, obviously still bothers the Left far more than it does the Right.
Inaugural crowd sizes ranked
A crowd scientist says Trump’s inauguration attendance was pretty average
Clearly, Trump's inauguration was at or ABOVE all in history EXCEPT for Obama's, making Obama's a fluke. And from the photo below, you can see that the real crowd at Trump's went back as far as the eye could see in every direction.
View attachment 215147
Truth is that Trump's inauguration was likely 3/5ths the size of the inauguration that preceded it. Pretty good for a guy given only a 6% chance of winning! That makes it one of the very largest ever, and likely as much reflects changes in public attitude as it does interest in the candidate. To be sure, Obama's first was a huge fluke far outside the norm and trumped up by the fact that he was the first black man. But looking at the picture above, it is easy to see that Trump's impression was legitimate. But right or wrong, the Left can't seem to let the matter go.
Don't get your feelings hurt...Obama is hugely popular, and Trump is an abomination. What did you expect?