republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.
They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.
What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.
They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.
Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.
www.usatoday.com
I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,
Nope. You are.
and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,
the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,
Mitt Romney "Corporations are people my friend"
Not that it makes your comment less nonsensical.
The 1st is meant for the government.
Does not say what people or corporations or businesses can or cannot do.
Only the government
You've a complete failure to understand either the meaning or intent of the 1st.
There's not a conservative alive that has even the vaguest ideas what the constitution is for or what it's about. I was told on another forum, by a person who claimed to be a lawyer, that the preamble didn't matter because it isn't really part of the document.
The preamble is not legally enforceable any more than the ideas in the Declaration are legally enforceable.
BUT
They set a moral tone for the direction of this country meaning they are every bit as important as the rest of the documents
BECAUSE
Without them we are not the USA.
The preamble is what the rest of the document is all about.
republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.
They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.
What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.
They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.
Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.
www.usatoday.com
I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,
Nope. You are.
and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,
the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,
Mitt Romney "Corporations are people my friend"
Not that it makes your comment less nonsensical.
The 1st is meant for the government.
Does not say what people or corporations or businesses can or cannot do.
Only the government
You've a complete failure to understand either the meaning or intent of the 1st.
There's not a conservative alive that has even the vaguest ideas what the constitution is for or what it's about. I was told on another forum, by a person who claimed to be a lawyer, that the preamble didn't matter because it isn't really part of the document.
The Constitution does not say socialism, fascism, capitalism, communism. None of it. It does say freedom and liberty and tells us about positive real money. Not the debt derived fiat currency we have today. So you must include that. But you can't. Because all of the agendas you have will fall like dominoes.
We have a more solid currency than our founders ever envisioned
Between 1790 and 1936 the US had easily a dozen depressions and dozens of regional recessions generally traceable to liquidity issues.
So long as the Fed acts to keep the lid on hyper-inflation the currency along with the euro will remain the model of currency stability.
And isn't it great the Fed is (sort of) politically independent.
youre forgetting they didnt have huge debt like we have now,,
the feds are eating us up with allowing that debt and getting filthy rich in the process,,
Sigh....
So let's go gold.
First, do we float or set a value? If we float prices will be generally competitive but subject to massive bouts of inflation and deflation. Set a value and imports could become prohibitively expensive.
Issue currency backed by gold or do business with actual gold? In either case, what do you do about hoarding?
We know all the answers to all the questions surrounding "going gold" because, to borrow a phrase, we've been there before.
Between 1790 and 1936 this country suffered literally dozens of recessions and depressions traceable to a lack of liquidity in the markets. The government's inability to print more money and remove money from the market meant there were no mechanisms to slow these bouts of depression and hyperinflation. Since 1936 the US has suffered zero depressions and, outside of 08/09 generally good economic growth thanks in good part to the Fed.
The ideas you're pushing are literally failed 19th century economic thought.