- Thread starter
- #101
That's true.It's not that I'm dodging the question -- it's that I'm pointing out it's a nonsensical question comprised of bullshit you're making up. How does one answer such a bullshit question?You are dodging the question, so. . . Again, I ask. . . .
How does this (FEDERAL LAW) NOT recognize a "child in the womb" as "a human being" and as such, a "natural PERSON?"
The charge of MURDER by definition is the act of one PERSON criminally killing another PERSON.
You can't be charged with MURDER for killing anything else.
Again... you were shown the definition of a "natural person" is s human being who was born. For you to continue asking a question based on that false premise is ridiculous.
Ok.... let me try to make this easier for you to understand.
Murder by definition is the criminal killing of one person by another person.
True or false.
True or false... in many, if not most, situations, abortion is not criminal?
That's true.
In most cases, abortions ARE (for now) legal.
This thread is not directly about abortions, however. Its about our fetal Homicide laws and whether or not those laws are Constitutional.
True or False. . . (Under the Federal Fetal Homicide law cited) All children in the womb are recognized and defined as such "in any stage of development" whether they are legally killed in a LEGAL abortion or not.