That's not what Finicum said and yes, this is about grazing rights. They want the land given to them.
Once again the point I am making is that there was nothing in this entire situation that justified the killing of anyone
Then they shouldn't have been carrying pistols and rifles...right???
Since when is merely being armed a reason to be shot by authorities?
Tell me did they ever point their weapons at anyone? That would have been a threat. A holstered piston or a rifle slung across someone's back is not a threat unless you're a chicken sit ***** like you
EXCEPT if you're black.
But, never mind that fact. What you are writing is FICTION.
From the beginning, these jackasses were not "merely armed". In TV interviews, Finicum constantly threatened to use his rifle. His rifle was never "on his back". It was across his lap.
They were criminals who got what they wanted.