Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath

[XponentialChaos]

THIS time, it will be different.

 

[rightwinger]

Mueller must be getting close...

Republicans are ramping up another Clinton investigation

 

[ColonelAngus]

It depends on what your meaning of the word is, is.

 

[12icer]

Hah what makes you think Miller’s indictments are against the Trump campaign when their scope was ALL election interference, there is OVERWHELMING proof of a widespread conspiracy by the dimocrats and a group of multinational globalist including some of george soros’s political hit organizations. Hell Muller is a Republican and has squeezed a lot of dimshit idiots into his group whil keeping his investigators completely secret from them. The actual tenet of a political investigation is to use smoke and mirrors, keep the people you don’t trust right with you where you know every move they make. Now let’s see, treason for the uranium 1 deal, conspiracy against the people of the USA. in the Election fraud, treason for giving aid and comfort to Iran at the request of Putin. Oh and the criminal act of transferring weapons to the Mexican drug cartel costing the lives of many people. Thankfully DOJ finally unraveled the fast and furious saga with Jeff Sessions as a non recused AG. Too bad he recused otherwise most dimshits would have met firing squads or have a new address in Kansas.

 

[Doc7505]

mdk thinks the Clintons should be given a special pass to break the law.

~~~~~~
There's no statute of limitations on Treason or Sedition.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. She broke USA laws.
2. And in doing she must go to trial.
3. If she has some bad ass lawyers she can get off.
4. This illegal activity will follow her to her grave.
5. There is too much evidence to be wiped clean with a joke, "Wipe her server?" "Like with a cloth".
6. Time is not on her side.
7. No one should be on her side.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[BlackFlag]

Judicial Watch:
Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath​

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her controversial email system.
In 2016, Clinton was required to submit under oath written answers to Judicial Watch’s questions. Clinton objected to and refused to answer questions about the creation of her email system; her decision to use the system despite warnings from State Department cybersecurity officials; and the basis for her claim that the State Department had “90-95%” of her emails.
After a lengthy hearing yesterday Judge Sullivan ruled that Clinton must address two questions that she refused to answer under-oath.

• Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.

• During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

Judge Sullivan read his opinion from the bench, deciding that the question about the creation of the email system was within the scope of discovery. Judge Sullivan rejected Clinton’s assertion of attorney-client privilege on the question about the emails “in the State’s system.”


~~~~~~
Hillary could care less what the judge ordered. She has been allowed to put herself above the law and knows that she is unaccountable to anyone. We have a two tiered legal system in this country: one for the Democrat Elites and another for the rest of us. Whatever happened to the McCabe's, Ohr's, Strzok's, Page's, Baker's within the Hillary cabal? Why aren't they all wearing orange jumpsuits in the gray bar hotels?

Lol Judicial Watch. Watchdogs when it serves their agenda, and never else. Hillary should plead the 5th and sip a pina colada when the questions are asked.

And we'll all watch the bitch die together.

 

[rightwinger]

Hah what makes you think Miller’s indictments are against the Trump campaign when their scope was ALL election interference, there is OVERWHELMING proof of a widespread conspiracy by the dimocrats and a group of multinational globalist including some of george soros’s political hit organizations. Hell Muller is a Republican and has squeezed a lot of dimshit idiots into his group whil keeping his investigators completely secret from them. The actual tenet of a political investigation is to use smoke and mirrors, keep the people you don’t trust right with you where you know every move they make. Now let’s see, treason for the uranium 1 deal, conspiracy against the people of the USA. in the Election fraud, treason for giving aid and comfort to Iran at the request of Putin. Oh and the criminal act of transferring weapons to the Mexican drug cartel costing the lives of many people. Thankfully DOJ finally unraveled the fast and furious saga with Jeff Sessions as a non recused AG. Too bad he recused otherwise most dimshits would have met firing squads or have a new address in Kansas.

OMG....Soros!

 

[rightwinger]

mdk thinks the Clintons should be given a special pass to break the law.

~~~~~~
There's no statute of limitations on Treason or Sedition.

In that case....Trump is screwed

 

[Natural Citizen]

They'd have a better shot at the state judiciary level. Federal courts are just gonna kick the can down the road until it finally lands in the weeds, gone forever.