There’s nothing to consider since you refuse to say what you mean by “blow back.”
You already defined it and your asking me to define it for you as though you don't know?
LOL! Dude. Dont' twist yourself into any more bullshit pretzel shapes.
You are an ass that never considered the likely response to your desire for a soft coup, and now that it has been brought to your attention, your only response is to play semantic games?
That will be a lot of help to you, if you get your way, and if blows up in your stupid face.
Now you’re lying again. I didn’t define it. I said it could be anything from foot stomping to armed rebellion. That’s a range and not a definition of what you mean by blow back. And yet you don’t want to say what you mean but you want people to answer your nebulous question.
And now we see the liberal, who has defined a word as a wide range of actions, asking for the word to be defined more specifically,
as though he does not understand that the word he just defined, as a wide range of possible action, is by it's very definition, that he has repeated posted, is not specific.
Thus we see that the modern liberal is completely and utterly with the slightest sense of intellectual honesty, or shame.
Meanwhile, while he is playing games, with semantics, extremely dishonest games with semantics,
he all the while is dodging a very simple quest that he has been asked, because he does not have an answer that does not paint him as a fucking moron.