Fauci approved Chloroquine in 2005 for coronavirus infection and spread

[badger2]

Wherever I, V, or L is encountered in the sequence, these are interchangeable, as per the coronavirus modus operandum of manipulating branch-chain amino acids.

 

[ClaireH]

The Science report, above, is most definitely misleading, as will be shown when comparing Zhang’s Longquan 140 collected nearest to Wuhan. Longquan 140 has identical sequences to the virus Daszak collected in 2011 at Kunming, the virus that then went to Barric’s North Carolina lab, RsSHC014.

The factor of influence: major recent funding boost by NIH to Science.org...which will become even more politically engrained via future monies. Current US governmental expansion plans to double up with not just one oversite layers but two, in addition to the one existing layer deemed ineffective.

A primary trait sought after for the next NIH head is an individual who can "creatively sell his ideas to the public" -paraphrasing) with science background secondary in status if at all. Seems their priorities are off a bit, yes?

 

[badger2]

The factor of influence: major recent funding boost by NIH to Science.org...which will become even more politically engrained via future monies. Current US governmental expansion plans to double up with not just one oversite layers but two, in addition to the one existing layer deemed ineffective.

A primary trait sought after for the next NIH head is an individual who can "creatively sell his ideas to the public" -paraphrasing) with science background secondary in status if at all. Seems their priorities are off a bit, yes?

Right now with the single layer, it only takes a bit of work to show the profound overconfidence of the media. The politicizing of science is already begging to spill over into outright nazism in NYC’s mayoral vax mandate, absurdly, as we watch the commie virus weaken.

In addition, this mandating is an intrusion and theft of each individual’s immune system evolution in dealing naturally with pathogens. The dam may not hold when the vaccine pedophiles get hold of the children’s barely mature immune systems using communist Chinese virus parts, or else not even the actual virus that’s attacking, but a surrogate adenovirus, one from humans (what humans?) and one from a chimpanzee (The Gambia, 1969).

 

[badger2]

Good question.

"Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronaviruses were found in raccoon dogs during the SARS outbreak, which was facilitated by animal-to-human contact in live-animal markets in China."

"A study published in June1 found that live animals susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, such as raccoon dogs and mink, were sold in numerous markets in Wuhan. Previous studies2 of the virus that caused severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have concluded that it, too, probably jumped multiple times from animals to people."

Did the coronavirus jump from animals to people twice?

A preliminary analysis of viral genomes suggests the COVID-19 pandemic might have multiple animal origins — but the findings still have to be peer reviewed.

www.nature.com

"Some of these farmed species (American minks, red foxes, and raccoon dogs) were sold alive for food by Wuhan animal sellers, as was trapped wildlife (including raccoon dogs and badgers), although no bat species were for sale (10). Together, this suggests a central role for SARSr-CoV–susceptible live intermediate host animals as the primary source of the SARS-CoV-2 progenitor that humans were exposed to, as was the case with the origin of SARS."

Science | AAAS

www.science.org

The report lists Rhinolophus shameli coronavirus. This bat links to a breast cancer gene:
Rhinolophus shameli BRCA1 (Breast Cancer Associated 1)

UniProt

www.uniprot.org

 

[schmidlap]

Fauci approved Chloroquine in 2005 for coronavirus infection and spread

Unlike political dogma, scientific data advances over time.

Obviously, if an effective preventative for Covid-19 and its variants had existed before 2021, there wold have been no need for Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, among others, to all assign priority status to developing one.

Rightists propaganda sites have their agenda, and their lackeys will spread their ideological affliction, but public health experts, virologists, and epidemiologists are immunized against it.

It's another lie, of course, but one that had no rational basis.

Did Fauci Say in 2005 Virology Journal That Hydroxychloroquine Can Treat SARS?

Shockingly, a screenshot of an opinion piece excerpt omitted some important facts.

www.snopes.com

​

Are SARS and COVID-19 the same? No.​

​

Are hydroxycloroquine and chloroquine the same thing? No.​

​

Did this study prove that chloroquine was an effective treatment against SARS? No.​

​

Did this study say that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment against SARS? No. ​

​

Was Fauci or the NIH involved in this 2005 paper? No. ​

​

Is hydroxychloroquine an effective treatment for COVID-19? No. ​

​

There is still no effective vaccination to prevent stupid.

 

[badger2]

Unlike political dogma, scientific data advances over time.

Obviously, if an effective preventative for Covid-19 and its variants had existed before 2021, there wold have been no need for Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, among others, to all assign priority status to developing one.

Rightists propaganda sites have their agenda, and their lackeys will spread their ideological affliction, but public health experts, virologists, and epidemiologists are immunized against it.

It's another lie, of course, but one that had no rational basis.

View attachment 573556

Did Fauci Say in 2005 Virology Journal That Hydroxychloroquine Can Treat SARS?

Shockingly, a screenshot of an opinion piece excerpt omitted some important facts.

www.snopes.com

​

​

Are SARS and COVID-19 the same? No.​

​

​

Are hydroxycloroquine and chloroquine the same thing? No.​

​

Did this study prove that chloroquine was an effective treatment against SARS? No.​

​

Did this study say that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment against SARS? No. ​

​

Was Fauci or the NIH involved in this 2005 paper? No. ​

​

Is hydroxychloroquine an effective treatment for COVID-19? No. ​

​

There is still no effective vaccination to prevent stupid.

You are incorrect, Trump is correct.

 

[schmidlap]

You are incorrect, Trump is correct.

Weird worshipers of one dude venerate their Cry Baby Loser as superior in all things, the failed casino operator and faded reality-tv performer not only more knowledgable than public health experts in matters of public health (despite all their academic credentials, dedication, and corroborative empirical data), but across the broad range of disciplines in which he insists that he knows more than everyone:

TRUMP KNOWS EVERYTHING:

The big picture: President Trump says he's an expert on a lot of things, including ISIS, taxes, technology, nuclear arms and even Sen. Cory Booker.

• Campaign finance: "I think nobody knows more about campaign finance than I do, because I'm the biggest contributor." (1999.)
• TV ratings: "I know more about people who get ratings than anyone." (October 2012.)
• ISIS: "I know more about ISIS than the generals do." (November 2015.)
• Social media: "I understand social media. I understand the power of Twitter. I understand the power of Facebook maybe better than almost anybody, based on my results, right?" (November 2015.)
• Courts: "I know more about courts than any human being on Earth." (November 2015.)
• Lawsuits: "[W]ho knows more about lawsuits than I do? I'm the king." (January 2016.)
• Politicians: "I understand politicians better than anybody."
• The visa system: "[N]obody knows the system better than me. I know the H1B. I know the H2B. ... Nobody else on this dais knows how to change it like I do, believe me." (March 2016.)
• Trade: "Nobody knows more about trade than me." (March 2016.)
• The U.S. government system: "[N]obody knows the system better than I do." (April 2016.)
• Renewable energy: "I know more about renewables than any human being on Earth." (April 2016.)
• Taxes: "I think nobody knows more about taxes than I do, maybe in the history of the world." (May 2016.)
• Debt: "I’m the king of debt. I’m great with debt. Nobody knows debt better than me." (June 2016.)
• Money: "I understand money better than anybody." (June 2016.)
• Infrastructure: "[L]ook, as a builder, nobody in the history of this country has ever known so much about infrastructure as Donald Trump." (July 2016.)
• Sen. Cory Booker: "I know more about Cory than he knows about himself." (July 2016.)
• Borders: Trump said in 2016 that Sheriff Joe Arpaio said he was endorsing him for president because "you know more about this stuff than anybody."
• Democrats: "I think I know more about the other side than almost anybody." (November 2016.)
• Construction: "[N]obody knows more about construction than I do." (May 2018.)
• The economy: "I think I know about it better than [the Federal Reserve]." (October 2018.)
• Technology: "Technology — nobody knows more about technology than me." (December 2018.)
• Drones: "I know more about drones than anybody. I know about every form of safety that you can have." (January 2019.)
• Drone technology: "Having a drone fly overhead — and I think nobody knows much more about technology, this type of technology certainly, than I do." (January 2019.)

Everything Trump says he knows "more about than anybody"

From ISIS to taxes, lawsuits and social media, Trump claims he's an expert on quite an array of topics.

www.axios.com

​

“I deal with architects all the time. They have zero talent. I can draw better than they can. And you know, drawing is an important part of being an architect, in my opinion.”​

What is he talking about? He doesn’t really know himself—when Birnbach asks him why the corners of Mar-a-Lago’s pool and tennis courts are cut off, Trump says these are chaffered corners, going as far as spelling the word for her. Trump was wrong about this—it’s actually chamfered, Birnbach clarifies. But the real point is to laugh and fantasize with this silly guy who is pouring ungodly amounts of money into making his club (memberships started at $25,000 but by November 1996 had jumped to $75,000) as “gorgeous” and “perfect” as possible. “There’s never been anything like it. There never will. You could never do it again,” he explains.​

E. Jean Carroll’s Stunning Accusation Forced Me to Remember Who Trump Used to Be​

 

[badger2]

Weird worshipers of one dude venerate their Cry Baby Loser as superior in all things, the failed casino operator and faded reality-tv performer not only more knowledgable than public health experts in matters of public health (despite all their academic credentials, dedication, and corroborative empirical data), but across the broad range of disciplines in which he insists that he knows more than everyone:

TRUMP KNOWS EVERYTHING:

The big picture: President Trump says he's an expert on a lot of things, including ISIS, taxes, technology, nuclear arms and even Sen. Cory Booker.

• Campaign finance: "I think nobody knows more about campaign finance than I do, because I'm the biggest contributor." (1999.)
• TV ratings: "I know more about people who get ratings than anyone." (October 2012.)
• ISIS: "I know more about ISIS than the generals do." (November 2015.)
• Social media: "I understand social media. I understand the power of Twitter. I understand the power of Facebook maybe better than almost anybody, based on my results, right?" (November 2015.)
• Courts: "I know more about courts than any human being on Earth." (November 2015.)
• Lawsuits: "[W]ho knows more about lawsuits than I do? I'm the king." (January 2016.)
• Politicians: "I understand politicians better than anybody."
• The visa system: "[N]obody knows the system better than me. I know the H1B. I know the H2B. ... Nobody else on this dais knows how to change it like I do, believe me." (March 2016.)
• Trade: "Nobody knows more about trade than me." (March 2016.)
• The U.S. government system: "[N]obody knows the system better than I do." (April 2016.)
• Renewable energy: "I know more about renewables than any human being on Earth." (April 2016.)
• Taxes: "I think nobody knows more about taxes than I do, maybe in the history of the world." (May 2016.)
• Debt: "I’m the king of debt. I’m great with debt. Nobody knows debt better than me." (June 2016.)
• Money: "I understand money better than anybody." (June 2016.)
• Infrastructure: "[L]ook, as a builder, nobody in the history of this country has ever known so much about infrastructure as Donald Trump." (July 2016.)
• Sen. Cory Booker: "I know more about Cory than he knows about himself." (July 2016.)
• Borders: Trump said in 2016 that Sheriff Joe Arpaio said he was endorsing him for president because "you know more about this stuff than anybody."
• Democrats: "I think I know more about the other side than almost anybody." (November 2016.)
• Construction: "[N]obody knows more about construction than I do." (May 2018.)
• The economy: "I think I know about it better than [the Federal Reserve]." (October 2018.)
• Technology: "Technology — nobody knows more about technology than me." (December 2018.)
• Drones: "I know more about drones than anybody. I know about every form of safety that you can have." (January 2019.)
• Drone technology: "Having a drone fly overhead — and I think nobody knows much more about technology, this type of technology certainly, than I do." (January 2019.)

Everything Trump says he knows "more about than anybody"

From ISIS to taxes, lawsuits and social media, Trump claims he's an expert on quite an array of topics.

www.axios.com

​

“I deal with architects all the time. They have zero talent. I can draw better than they can. And you know, drawing is an important part of being an architect, in my opinion.”​

What is he talking about? He doesn’t really know himself—when Birnbach asks him why the corners of Mar-a-Lago’s pool and tennis courts are cut off, Trump says these are chaffered corners, going as far as spelling the word for her. Trump was wrong about this—it’s actually chamfered, Birnbach clarifies. But the real point is to laugh and fantasize with this silly guy who is pouring ungodly amounts of money into making his club (memberships started at $25,000 but by November 1996 had jumped to $75,000) as “gorgeous” and “perfect” as possible. “There’s never been anything like it. There never will. You could never do it again,” he explains.​

E. Jean Carroll’s Stunning Accusation Forced Me to Remember Who Trump Used to Be​

Weld this to your soul, Einstein: hydroxychloroquine stops the commie virus regardless of who is promoting it. This is a scientific fact. To oppose it is to be stupid.

 

[schmidlap]

Weld this to your soul, Einstein: hydroxychloroquine stops the commie virus regardless of who is promoting it. This is a scientific fact. To oppose it is to be stupid.

You are a believer. I'll trust to the empirical reality preferred by public health experts, virologists, and epidemiologists.

The undeniable fact of unvaccinated contracting Covid, requiring hospitalization, requiring intensive care, and dying at a much higher rate than the vaccinated trumps blind faith for most rational folks.

Despite the hype of ideological media entertainers, multiple studies provide data that hydroxychloroquine does not provide a medical benefit for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

 

[eagle1462010]

You are a believer. I'll trust to the empirical reality preferred by public health experts, virologists, and epidemiologists.

The undeniable fact of unvaccinated contracting Covid, requiring hospitalization, requiring intensive care, and dying at a much higher rate than the vaccinated trumps blind faith for most rational folks.

Despite the hype of ideological media entertainers, multiple studies provide data that hydroxychloroquine does not provide a medical benefit for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

9 out of 10 Pfizer employees agree with you. lol

 

[schmidlap]

9 out of 10 Pfizer employees agree with you. lol

Ideological dogmatists or public health professionals in matters of public health?

"Ooooo! That's a tough one!"​

How many other scientific and medical disciplines do the true believers reject as they embrace media entertainers, instead?

Call Carrot Top for your irritable colon!

 

[eagle1462010]

Ideological dogmatists or public health professionals in matters of public health?

View attachment 574439
"Ooooo! That's a tough one!"​

How many other scientific and medical disciplines do the true believers reject as they embrace media entertainers, instead?

Call Carrot Top for your irritable colon!

Your opinion matters exactly NOTHING TO ME. i've posted data time and again and you are not important to me whatsoever.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Frank has gotten more violent and psychotic as the years pass. Thus, he's gained status in the Trump cult.

Fauci, that was for a different coronavirus, so not applicable now. You 'noids to understand that COVID-19 wasn't around in 2005, right?

No it wasn't--other coronavirus which Covid 19 is after Fauci and the Chinese invented it

 

[badger2]

You are a believer. I'll trust to the empirical reality preferred by public health experts, virologists, and epidemiologists.

The undeniable fact of unvaccinated contracting Covid, requiring hospitalization, requiring intensive care, and dying at a much higher rate than the vaccinated trumps blind faith for most rational folks.

Despite the hype of ideological media entertainers, multiple studies provide data that hydroxychloroquine does not provide a medical benefit for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

It was virologists that prove you incorrect, and they did it back in 2000 At the VIII International Nidovirus Symposium. The authors are Blau DM and Holmes KV, and the title of the article is Human Coronavirus HCoV-229E Enters Susceptible Cells Via the Endocytic Pathway. (USMB search ‘Blau’) Trump was also correct, though hydroxychloroquine must be present for the most part, as the virus attempts to enter the host.

 

[badger2]

No it wasn't--other coronavirus which Covid 19 is after Fauci and the Chinese invented it

There was no need to invent anything. The virus was nasty enough, and the commie Chinese knew it, right from the bat’s anus, not far from other roosting, breathing bats. It has not been found in bats, and SARS-CoV-1 also has no documented proof of the precise geography it came from. Intelligent people will boycott as much Chinese as they can, and lastingly, considering there’s yet to be published a names list of the 700,000+ Americans who have disappeared.

 

[badger2]

Kennedy’s work cites Fau Chi’s sham:

’Risch: “The key to defeating COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it....He now cited (twelve [italics]) clinical studies suggesting that the early administration of HCQ could lower death rates by 50 percent....Dr. Fauci repeatedly insisted he would not allow HCQ for COVID-19 until its efficacy is proven in “randomized, double-blind placebo studies.” Dr. Risch calls this position a “transparent sham.” Dr. Fauci knew that neither industry nor its PI’s would ever sponsor trials for a product with expired patents. It’s noteworthy that while Dr. Fauci was bemoaning the lack of evidence of HCQ efficacy, he was refusing to commission his own trials to study the early use of the hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and Zithromax remedy.

Fauci himself, while spending 48 billion dollars on zero-liability vaccines, at first refused to allocate anything for a randomized placebo study of HCQ. Even worse, he cancelled two NIAID-sponsored trials of outpatient HCQ before completion.’
(Kennedy, The Real Anthony Fauci, pp. 34-5 Dr. Fauci’s Hypocritical HCQ Games)

HCQ changes the pH that the virus relies on, (and Homo sapiens should indeed rely on that single chlorine atom) if it does so at the time the virus tries to enter the host

 

[eagle1462010]

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy... : American Journal of Therapeutics

ed within clinical trials. Areas of Uncertainty: The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the...

journals.lww.com

This is evidence from India. They are suing the WHO and charging the head of the WHO with MURDER for spreading false information on Ivermectin. A State in India changed it's mind over Ivermectin and didn't use it ........and it cost them 10s of thousands of lives.

 

[Rigby5]

Even if true, then, we now know better because of all the recent studies that prove it is not effective on COVID-19. May also cause damage to heart and liver.

There are no studies showing the synthetic quinines do not work.
That is because they do work.
Their purpose for malaria is to stop the immune system from trying to kill the parasites with a high fever, because malaria parasites can't be killed with a high fever.
Similarly, covid-19 can not be killed with a high fever, so taking quinine or synthetics is a good idea, to stop any high fever the immune system might try.

 

[Rigby5]

Unlike political dogma, scientific data advances over time.

Obviously, if an effective preventative for Covid-19 and its variants had existed before 2021, there wold have been no need for Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, among others, to all assign priority status to developing one.

Rightists propaganda sites have their agenda, and their lackeys will spread their ideological affliction, but public health experts, virologists, and epidemiologists are immunized against it.

It's another lie, of course, but one that had no rational basis.

View attachment 573556

Did Fauci Say in 2005 Virology Journal That Hydroxychloroquine Can Treat SARS?

Shockingly, a screenshot of an opinion piece excerpt omitted some important facts.

www.snopes.com

​

​

Are SARS and COVID-19 the same? No.​

​

​

Are hydroxycloroquine and chloroquine the same thing? No.​

​

Did this study prove that chloroquine was an effective treatment against SARS? No.​

​

Did this study say that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment against SARS? No. ​

​

Was Fauci or the NIH involved in this 2005 paper? No. ​

​

Is hydroxychloroquine an effective treatment for COVID-19? No. ​

​

There is still no effective vaccination to prevent stupid.

That is not accurate.

SARS and COVID-19 are nearly identical coronaviruses, and the over reaction by the immune system that does all the damage, is identical.

Hydroxycloroquinine and chloroquine are not the same thing, but are VERY SIMILAR.
They both have the same goal and work in the same way, as a synthetic quinine that prevents a deadly high fever.
Which is good for the treatment of covid-19.

No one needs a treatment for SARS, but a treatment to prevent an out of control over reaction by the immune system, which all synthetic quinine products can do to some degree, depending on the patient.

The point is that Fauci has input that went into this paper, and Fauci had to then have known that synthetic quinine produces do work.

No one needs a treatment for covid-19, but a treatment to prevent an out of control over reaction by the immune system, which all synthetic quinine products can do to some degree, depending on the patient.

 

[schmidlap]

That is not accurate.

SARS and COVID-19 are nearly identical coronaviruses, and the over reaction by the immune system that does all the damage, is identical.

Hydroxycloroquinine and chloroquine are not the same thing, but are VERY SIMILAR.
They both have the same goal and work in the same way, as a synthetic quinine that prevents a deadly high fever.
Which is good for the treatment of covid-19.

No one needs a treatment for SARS, but a treatment to prevent an out of control over reaction by the immune system, which all synthetic quinine products can do to some degree, depending on the patient.

The point is that Fauci has input that went into this paper, and Fauci had to then have known that synthetic quinine produces do work.

No one needs a treatment for covid-19, but a treatment to prevent an out of control over reaction by the immune system, which all synthetic quinine products can do to some degree, depending on the patient.

I respect the public health expertise of the CDC and the preponderance of actual medical authorities, practicing epidemiologists and virologists. Some don't, and parrot fringe characters, ideological media entertainers, and zany politicians.

Does hydroxychloroquine work as a vaccine against COVID-19? No, that's not true: The Food & Drug Administration and the World Health Organization don't recommend the drug, which is used to treat malaria, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, for the treatment of COVID.​

Fact Check: Hydroxychloroquine Does NOT Work As A Vaccine For COVID-19 | Lead Stories

Does hydroxychloroquine work as a vaccine against COVID-19? No, that's not true: The Food & Drug Administration and the World...

leadstories.com

​

Eventually - after the damage has been done - the data displaces the dogma.​

​

‘It’s A Real Lifesaver’:​

Trump Gives Strongest Endorsement Of Covid-19 Vaccines​

​