Family of mom whose suspected killer is illegal immigrant praises Clinton for calling out Biden-Harris border

You keep saying Ukraine wasn’t the issue but you can’t explain why Ukraine was so heavily tied to US Border Security funding. Trump does not have that sway among Republicans.

Oh, of course he does. He can unleash an angry mob to murder them and they will STILL vote not to impeach him.
 
Oh, of course he does. He can unleash an angry mob to murder them and they will STILL vote not to impeach him.
Mitch McConnell and most of the senior Republicans in Washington are milquetoast RINOs who care more about what Democrats want and could care less about Donald Trump. It’s the Democrats trying to push the facade that Trump killed it.
 
Mitch McConnell and most of the senior Republicans in Washington are milquetoast RINOs who care more about what Democrats want and could care less about Donald Trump. It’s the Democrats trying to push the facade that Trump killed it.

Except that Mitch was the guy who negotiated the agreement, and then killed it when Trump threatened him.

Trump killed border security, because he wants you stupid white people to be scared.
 
Except that Mitch was the guy who negotiated the agreement, and then killed it when Trump threatened him.

Trump killed border security, because he wants you stupid white people to be scared.
you call me stupid yet you see logic and benefit in tying more than 50 percent of the border security bill’s funding to Ukraine….. yet you still can’t explain why Ukraine funding was such a factor.
 
you call me stupid yet you see logic and benefit in tying more than 50 percent of the border security bill’s funding to Ukraine….. yet you still can’t explain why Ukraine funding was such a factor.

Doesn't matter.

Probably beause War on the Ukraine was the only way to get some Repukes to sign on.

Here's the better question, why are you guys so Pro-Putin.
 
Doesn't matter.

Probably beause War on the Ukraine was the only way to get some Repukes to sign on.

Here's the better question, why are you guys so Pro-Putin.
No. The Democrats put heavy Ukraine funding for Border Security because the Democrats don’t want Border Security and they want to blame Trump for their failures.
 
Most Republicans are for supporting Ukraine. The bill was killed by Republicans.
First, you have provided no empirical data validating your claim that most Republicans are for supporting Ukraine. Next, assuming your claim is validated by numbers, where are the numbers correlating Republican support for tying Ukraine funding to a Border Security Bill?
Finally, now you are saying Republicans killed the Bill whereas before, it was Trump.

Republicans definitely killed the Bill without Trump. The Bill was conditioned upon Ukraine funding and the terms of the Border security enforcement weren’t strong enough.

Clearly, the final Bill was not bipartisan.,
 
First, you have provided no empirical data validating your claim that most Republicans are for supporting Ukraine.

Sure I do. Once the Aid package was separated from the Border Provisions, the GOP happily voted for it.


Finally, now you are saying Republicans killed the Bill whereas before, it was Trump.

Republicans killed it because Trump TOLD them to. Are you this ******* dense? I mean, seriously, are you waiting for the ******* short bus?
 
Sure I do. Once the Aid package was separated from the Border Provisions, the GOP happily voted for it.




Republicans killed it because Trump TOLD them to. Are you this ******* dense? I mean, seriously, are you waiting for the ******* short bus?
Again, you have yet to show where Republicans supported tying Ukraine and Border Security. Your link mentions nothing of Border Security. Your link provides no support of your claim that because some Republicans supported funding of Ukraine, they therefore supported a bill tying Ukraine and Border Security funding. And, your link provides no mention or proof that Congressional Republicans stood down in support of a combined Ukraine-Border Security bill because Trump told them to.

It is comical watching you call me dense while you fail to provide any validation or support for your lies. Keep it up.
 
Bill Clinton was the guy most responsible for the flood of undocumented immigrants when he signed NAFTA and displaced millions of Mexican Farmers who couldn't compete with American farmers.
um no, if Harris and Xiden didn't have an open border policy, those farmers could, still migrate here legally on work permits.
 
Except that Mitch was the guy who negotiated the agreement, and then killed it when Trump threatened him.

Trump killed border security, because he wants you stupid white people to be scared.
ah your first post blamed Clinton, now you blame Trump....funny how Harris and Xiden's admin just can't get anything done because of two former Presidents.

Your argument highlights, why we shouldn't vote for Harris even more
 
As we all know, the flood on both our southern and northern borders has skyrocketed from the start of the Biden/Harris administration.
They will both be remembered as the two central characters who accelerated the end of America as we know it.


"You had a case in Georgia not very long ago, didn't you? They made an ad about it. A young woman who had been killed by an immigrant. Yeah, well, if they'd all been properly vetted that probably wouldn't have happened. But if they’re all properly vetted, that doesn’t happen," he added.



vggggsggsgahahah.webp
 
Okay.

Biden and Harris tried to pass a law that would dedicate more resources to do that.

Trump told his allies in Congress to kill it so he'd have an issue for the election.
Lol, they wanted more people to process the illegals. You're such a liar.
 
Except that Mitch was the guy who negotiated the agreement, and then killed it when Trump threatened him.

Trump killed border security, because he wants you stupid white people to be scared.
All Biden had to do was put Trump's border policies back in place. You know the ones he got rid of the first day. You're such a liar.
 
Again, you have yet to show where Republicans supported tying Ukraine and Border Security.

Guy, that wasn't the point. Republicans killed the Bill. They did not kill it because of Ukraine, which they later voted for. They killed it to help Trump.

If you aren't going to be intellectually honest, there's no point talking with you.
 
15th post
Guy, that wasn't the point. Republicans killed the Bill. They did not kill it because of Ukraine, which they later voted for. They killed it to help Trump.

If you aren't going to be intellectually honest, there's no point talking with you.
You aren’t showing any data to back up the bullshit claim that the Republican Party - one that is not united behind Trump - took Trump’s orders to kill the bill to make him look good.

You and Kamala might have a legitimate claim if this so-called bipartisan bill had not been tied to significant funding for another initiative in Ukraine;,regardless if more Republicans supported funding for Ukraine on a stand-alone basis in another legislation.

Democrats didn’t want Border Security legislation to pass as they are happy with 2 Million plus crossing the border annually.
 
Stay in Mexico?

Terrible policy.

First, we lied to Mexico to get them to go along. The promise was, "You stay in Mexico and we will process your asylum claim and let you in when it's processed."

Except. We didn't do that. We filed them all under "I don't give a shit."


But the RMX policy—and others like it that would force asylum seekers to wait outside the United States for their cases to be heard—simply cannot be implemented lawfully, safely, fairly, or humanely. During the court-ordered reimplementation of RMX (or RMX 2.0), asylum seekers reported horrific kidnappings, rapes, and other violent attacks after DHS returned them to Mexico. RMX hearings also remained a due process farce. Only a tiny percentage of the individuals whose cases were decided under RMX 2.0 managed to find attorneys to represent them. A vanishingly small number of the mainly Cubans, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans subjected to the policy were granted asylum—just 63 people out of more than 1,600 completed cases.


Furthermore, Mexico refuses to go along with re-instating it.


"Regarding the possible implementation of this policy for the third time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on behalf of the Government of Mexico, expresses its rejection of the U.S. government's intention to return individuals processed under the program to Mexico," the statement said.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom