FAA Temp. Bans Drone Operations - DEADLY FORCE - IMMINENT SECURITY THREAT

Thunk

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
12,937
Reaction score
21,067
Points
2,430
Location
Minnesota
FAA temporarily bans drones in parts of New Jersey, notice threatens 'deadly force' for 'imminent security threat'

Thousands of people have contacted the FBI to report unusual drone activity.


The Federal Aviation Administration issued a ban on drone operations in several areas of New Jersey until Jan. 17, unless operators are granted special permission from the government due to "special security reasons."

Uncrewed aerial drones have been lighting up the sky at night in New Jersey and nearby states for weeks, since about mid-November, leading to concern from residents and speculation online. Some had demanded answers from local and state officials for answers.

The restrictions say no uncrewed aircraft systems can operate within a nautical mile of the airspace specified in each Notice to Airmen, or NOTAM, including from the ground up to 400 feet. Recreational drones are allowed to operate up to 400 feet, under FAA rules.

The previously issued temporary flight restrictions for Bedminster and Picatinny Arsenal remain in place.

The government may use "deadly force" against the drones if they pose an "imminent security threat," the NOTAM said.



 
LOL.....Deploy "Wild Weasels" against the operators.

090605-F-1234P-012.JPG


Well, they said "deadly force". ;)
 
FAA temporarily bans drones in parts of New Jersey, notice threatens 'deadly force' for 'imminent security threat'

That is ripe. How is the FAA going to ENFORCE this new restriction when:
  1. They can't even identify where the drones are coming from.
  2. They can't even identify who is operating them?
  3. They can't even identify what they are being used for?
Are they going to start shooting them down? You know, what they said no one could do?
They might be starting a war with Iran or China!
I sure hope that isn't my Amazon package up there!

It wouldn't surprise me if now the drone operators merely move their flight paths to NEW locations outside the FAA restricted space and give them a big FU.
 
FAA temporarily bans drones in parts of New Jersey, notice threatens 'deadly force' for 'imminent security threat'

Thousands of people have contacted the FBI to report unusual drone activity.


The Federal Aviation Administration issued a ban on drone operations in several areas of New Jersey until Jan. 17, unless operators are granted special permission from the government due to "special security reasons."

Uncrewed aerial drones have been lighting up the sky at night in New Jersey and nearby states for weeks, since about mid-November, leading to concern from residents and speculation online. Some had demanded answers from local and state officials for answers.

The restrictions say no uncrewed aircraft systems can operate within a nautical mile of the airspace specified in each Notice to Airmen, or NOTAM, including from the ground up to 400 feet. Recreational drones are allowed to operate up to 400 feet, under FAA rules.

The previously issued temporary flight restrictions for Bedminster and Picatinny Arsenal remain in place.

The government may use "deadly force" against the drones if they pose an "imminent security threat," the NOTAM said.



The conspiracy theories over this are hilarious.

Opinion
Garrett M. Graff

Panic over mystery drones says more about people than UFOs​

Life’s great mysteries aren’t solved while taking out the trash or driving along a deserted highway.

:spinner:
The rising panic over mystery drones swarming the skies of Mid-Atlantic states reminds us that, in the centuries-long hunt to identify UFOs, humans are usually the weakest link.
America has real national security challenges in the new era of unmanned aerial vehicles in warfare. But an invasion of mystery drones over New Jersey isn’t one of them.

As it turns out, just as eyewitnesses often bungle the details of, say, a car accident on the corner, we are notoriously unreliable when it comes to identifying and reporting UFOs. A huge percentage of “sightings” turn out, upon investigation, to be the planet Venus or other surprisingly bright astronomical phenomena; people on the ground regularly misjudge distances in the sky so that even objects miles away are perceived to be close by.

The UFO mistaken-identity problem is a big part of the reason that the military and scientists now refer to such sightings more precisely as UAP, or unidentified anomalous phenomena — a label meant to capture that many sightings might not be “objects” at all but are more likely to be known, or as yet unknown, astronomical and atmospheric phenomena.
:rofl:
 
The conspiracy theories over this are hilarious.

Opinion
Garrett M. Graff

Panic over mystery drones says more about people than UFOs​

Life’s great mysteries aren’t solved while taking out the trash or driving along a deserted highway.

:spinner:
The rising panic over mystery drones swarming the skies of Mid-Atlantic states reminds us that, in the centuries-long hunt to identify UFOs, humans are usually the weakest link.
America has real national security challenges in the new era of unmanned aerial vehicles in warfare. But an invasion of mystery drones over New Jersey isn’t one of them.

As it turns out, just as eyewitnesses often bungle the details of, say, a car accident on the corner, we are notoriously unreliable when it comes to identifying and reporting UFOs. A huge percentage of “sightings” turn out, upon investigation, to be the planet Venus or other surprisingly bright astronomical phenomena; people on the ground regularly misjudge distances in the sky so that even objects miles away are perceived to be close by.

The UFO mistaken-identity problem is a big part of the reason that the military and scientists now refer to such sightings more precisely as UAP, or unidentified anomalous phenomena — a label meant to capture that many sightings might not be “objects” at all but are more likely to be known, or as yet unknown, astronomical and atmospheric phenomena.
:rofl:
^^^ TV told this guy not to worry about the drones. Polls show over 70% of democrats TRUST msm

He doesn't know whose flying the drones.

He doesn't know what the drones are doing.

But he does know they are harmless and nothing to worry about.

The fact WEF/Democrat shills are telling Americans not to worry about the drones means Americans would be wise to avoid areas the drones are operating in.
 
A drone signal can be tracked back to the operator.
It should be easy to find the person operating the drone.
 
I assume they used the words "deadly force" to warn planes to NOT fly in the area...they might get shot down.
 
Back
Top Bottom