Again -- I posed the question what religion -- any religion --- has to do with this event.
That question has zero answer.
When you have zero answer --- you don't have the right question. Premise fails.
Okay, Pogo, let's take a look at the available evidence:
1) It was a suicide bombing. They found the remains of the bomb vest and bomber where the explosion occurred.
2) It targeted children, mainly tweens and teen girls. Which consisted a majority of the audience in attendance.
3) It was most likely a response to Trump's speech urging the Islamic faith to drive out the radical element in Saudi Arabia yesterday.
Considering those three things, it smells of radical Islam, seeing as radical Islam treats women as pure garbage, and the the preferred tactics the extremists use is suicide bombing, and Trump himself has made it clear he wishes to eradicate terrorism.
Three plausible points. As is the suggestion that the timing is to coincide with Rump's travels.
But none of those factors points to a
religion. Some point to a radical political group that operates
in the name of religion, but then so did the aforementioned Eric Rudolph, Bobby Joe Rogers et al --- and nobody called for "nuking the Vatican". Anybody in the world can
claim to operate in the name of religion. Just as I could
claim to call myself a tree.
Okay, not a fair comparison --- we actually found out the identities of those Christian perps, whereas in this case we have nothing.
And yet --- on the basis of that nothing --- we've got armchair wags here who would "nuke Mecca" and wipe all mosques off the earth, on the basis of absolutely nothing but their own paranoia.
"I'm paranoid, and therefore you billion people must die".
Now THAT's terrorism. And it's fucked up thinking.
