john doe 101
Platinum Member
- Sep 6, 2021
- 16,624
- 8,358
- 1,138
You not knowing how things work equates to rigged in your fucked up minds.Like Julian Assange? Speaking the truth too damn much?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You not knowing how things work equates to rigged in your fucked up minds.Like Julian Assange? Speaking the truth too damn much?
Look no further than the SCOTUS.You have no obligation to honor the judgment, and you have no obligation to obey illegitimate laws.
There are a few individual exceptions, but for the most part the US judiciary is corrupt to the core. Look no further than Brunson v. Adams.
Juries have become rubberstamps for government malfeasance, as this case with Trump shows.
Oh but I do know how things work. I know how they are supposed to work under the Constitution because I've studied the document for years. I also know how they work in reality as I've sat in on numerous trials.You not knowing how things work equates to rigged in your fucked up minds.
Another "do your own research" guy. Ever open a Constitutional Law text book or were you just born with all this great knowledge?Oh but I do know how things work. I know how they are supposed to work under the Constitution because I've studied the document for years. I also know how they work in reality as I've sat in on numerous trials.
I also know there is no rule of law in these United States. Not sure exactly when it died, but it's been more than 20 years ago.
If the truth could be known, it's likely I've read more books about the Constitution and its principles than you have. No lawyer here, but a curious mind.Another "do your own research" guy. Ever open a Constitutional Law text book or were you just born with all this great knowledge?
Who gives a shit if you do or don't?Seriously... Make it make sense. A court is supposed to be one of Justice, not convention. So Why should I honor this Judgment?
That is, the paid Trump cult shills with the perfect failure records.All the legal eagles
That's the proper way to do things, according to legal precedent, case law, common sense and good morality.commented that given that the judge gave the jury a 'choice of crimes' and as long as all the jurors picked one, he would be guilty of whatever got picked,
Part of civil disobedience is admitting you violated the law you think is unjust, and then being willing to go to prison for violating the law that you think is unjustYou have no obligation to honor the judgment, and you have no obligation to obey illegitimate laws.
In this case the jury was told they didn't have to agree.That is, the paid Trump cult shills with the perfect failure records.
That's the proper way to do things, according to legal precedent, case law, common sense and good morality.
Thje jury doesn't have to agree on precisely why the perp committed the crime. The jury just has to agree that the crime was committed.
Maybe not me specifically, as I'm not a NY resident. But to the larger point of the citizenry in general,losing faith that the Judicial system itself, and it's agents, are executing their respective duties faithfully, honestly, and diligently. If a large enough portion of the citizenry do not feel that they are doing so; that presents some real problems for a governmental system that requires the consent of the governed.Who gives a shit if you do or don't?
What does that even mean? You're not the one facing legal consequences....
That's a big IF. Wake me when the cuckolds get there.Maybe not me specifically, as I'm not a NY resident. But to the larger point of the citizenry in general,losing faith that the Judicial system itself, and it's agents, are executing their respective duties faithfully, honestly, and diligently. If a large enough portion of the citizenry do not feel that they are doing so; that presents some real problems for a governmental system that requires the consent of the governed.
I'm a fan of Henry Thoreau. Likely you're not. Likely you don't even know what Thoreau did. Have you read his book "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience"?Part of civil disobedience is admitting you violated the law you think is unjust, and then being willing to go to prison for violating the law that you think is unjust
Are you ready for that? If you're not willing to go to prison for your beliefs, you're just a complainer.
So that's a "no", I take it. Unlike Thoreau, you're not willing to back up your claims by accepting the penalty for breaking the law.I'm a fan of Henry Thoreau. Likely you're not. Likely you don't even know what Thoreau did. Have you read his book "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience"?
I've already spent my share of time in prison for violating illegitimate laws. You're full of hot air, nothing more.So that's a "no", I take it. Unlike Thoreau, you're not willing to back up your claims by accepting the penalty for breaking the law.
Are you at least living completely off-grid, to minimize what you have to lose through civil disobedience?