Exclusive: Fani Willis Possesses Evidence Exonerating Georgia’s Alternate Electors and Trump

Demofascists always dispute the source even when the source presents official documents. The source is always fake news. Now, if CNN or WaPo is the source, well........ But CNN or WaPo never reports the same news as Fake News sites because fake news.
See what I mean? playtime gave me a fake news about my fake news concerning fake news.
 
This malicious prosecutor should be charged, tried, convicted, disbarred, and sentenced to prison.

Fani Willis withheld exculpatory evidence
Evidence Exonerating Georgia’s Alternate Electors

In her Aug. 14 laughable indictment of Trump, Fani Willis alleged
<><>the existence of Republican electors for Trump constituted an unlawful “conspiracy” to overturn 2020 election results.
<><>Willis falsely claimed these alternate electors “unlawfully falsely held themselves out” as Georgia’s “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.
<><>She further insisted these electors intentionally attempted to “mislead.”

However, among the documents Willis has in her possession obtained during her years-long investigation of Republicans was a meeting transcript refuting her allegations which she willfully withheld.

<><>A transcript of the Georgia Republican electors’ Dec. 14, 2020, meeting, obtained by The Federalist, explicitly shows the intent

<><>that casting alternate electors was not to impersonate public officers, as Willis alleged, but to lawfully preserve Trump’s legal challenge to the state’s election results.

<><> documents specifically noted how the electors were acting as “Republican nominees for Presidential Elector,” not as “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.

The same facts asserted in this Georgia case are applicable to those charged for a similar offense in Michigan. People forget (or never knew) that Hawaii sent three sets of electors to DC in the 1960 race, which was undecided when they left Hawaii for DC.







Desperation is funny sometimes.
 
At the time of this meeting there had not been 100 recounts. This was done before then. Trump had strong reason, as we all do, that something was amiss in GA. He did nothing that Hawaii didn't do in 1960. At the time of this meeting, NONE of his challenges had been heard in court.

Triggered?
Many of his challenges had been heard. He ran out of time to do anything more. Once the electors vote, there can be no more recounts.

That’s what the Supreme Court said in Bush v Gore.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom