Exactly what and why was the 2nd amendment written like it is

[danielpalos]

changing your story again, story teller? The People are the Militia. Well regulated militia of the People may not be Infringed, when it is about the security of a free State.

I have not changed my story. And the militia is made up of armed citizen soldiers. "The right of the people" not "The right of the militia"

How did that work for the South? Only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

 

[Pop23]

I have not changed my story. And the militia is made up of armed citizen soldiers. "The right of the people" not "The right of the militia"

How did that work for the South? Only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Shoooo you mangy dog, we've gone over this, like two dozen times with you. You lost every time.

 

[danielpalos]

How did that work for the South? Only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Shoooo you mangy dog, we've gone over this, like two dozen times with you. You lost every time.

only in right wing, fallacy induced fantasy.

 

[Pop23]

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Shoooo you mangy dog, we've gone over this, like two dozen times with you. You lost every time.

only in right wing, fallacy induced fantasy.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have not changed my story. And the militia is made up of armed citizen soldiers. "The right of the people" not "The right of the militia"

How did that work for the South? Only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Exactly HOW did the Civil War prove anything to do with the 2nd amendment? Come on, actually answer a question for a change.

FYI, when you post something you pretend to be a fact, and do not provide any clarification, back-up or evidence, no one gives your claim any credence. So what you say about right wingers is actually true of you, if you refuse to answer questions.

 

[danielpalos]

How did that work for the South? Only well regulated militias of the United States, may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Exactly HOW did the Civil War prove anything to do with the 2nd amendment? Come on, actually answer a question for a change.

FYI, when you post something you pretend to be a fact, and do not provide any clarification, back-up or evidence, no one gives your claim any credence. So what you say about right wingers is actually true of you, if you refuse to answer questions.

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

 

[WinterBorn]

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Exactly HOW did the Civil War prove anything to do with the 2nd amendment? Come on, actually answer a question for a change.

FYI, when you post something you pretend to be a fact, and do not provide any clarification, back-up or evidence, no one gives your claim any credence. So what you say about right wingers is actually true of you, if you refuse to answer questions.

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

 

[danielpalos]

only in right wing fantasy. The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Exactly HOW did the Civil War prove anything to do with the 2nd amendment? Come on, actually answer a question for a change.

FYI, when you post something you pretend to be a fact, and do not provide any clarification, back-up or evidence, no one gives your claim any credence. So what you say about right wingers is actually true of you, if you refuse to answer questions.

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

 

[WinterBorn]

Dude, you wrote the answer yourself. You don't even believe your own shit. Why would we?

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Exactly HOW did the Civil War prove anything to do with the 2nd amendment? Come on, actually answer a question for a change.

FYI, when you post something you pretend to be a fact, and do not provide any clarification, back-up or evidence, no one gives your claim any credence. So what you say about right wingers is actually true of you, if you refuse to answer questions.

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[danielpalos]

You can't re-write history. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed,regardless of all of the other ones. Our Civil War, proved it and fixed it as precedent.

Exactly HOW did the Civil War prove anything to do with the 2nd amendment? Come on, actually answer a question for a change.

FYI, when you post something you pretend to be a fact, and do not provide any clarification, back-up or evidence, no one gives your claim any credence. So what you say about right wingers is actually true of you, if you refuse to answer questions.

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

 

[WinterBorn]

Exactly HOW did the Civil War prove anything to do with the 2nd amendment? Come on, actually answer a question for a change.

FYI, when you post something you pretend to be a fact, and do not provide any clarification, back-up or evidence, no one gives your claim any credence. So what you say about right wingers is actually true of you, if you refuse to answer questions.

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

 

[Pop23]

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

And Joe, because he owned a gun was practiced in it use and care, thus requiring far less training and resources when called upon.

 

[danielpalos]

The entire South, got Infringed by well regulated militias of the United States.

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

He was well regulated. That was the whole and entire difference.

 

[WinterBorn]

For the purpose of this discussion, that is meaningless. No one, in all these pages of discussion has said militias could not fight. And the main reason the Union won was the vastly superior resources, not the militia.

The only thing it proves is the point that people have been trying to make to you. The men who signed up and went to fight Johnny Reb were not organized militia until they were called up. They did not drill before they were needed.

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

He was well regulated. That was the whole and entire difference.

He was well regulated when he served. Before that he was not. That is what I have been telling you since the beginning. The right to keep and bear arms is his, not the militia’s.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it isn't. Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; it Had to happen that way.

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

He was well regulated. That was the whole and entire difference.

He was well regulated when he served. Before that he was not. That is what I have been telling you since the beginning. The right to keep and bear arms is his, not the militia’s.

Unorganized militias were Infringed, as People; by well regulated militias of the United States; just like it says in our Second Amendment.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, the militia is well regulated. But the individual was not regulated until he joined the militia. Citizen soldiers. And the 2nd amendment does not say anything about the rights of the militia. It addresses the right of the people. That gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

He was well regulated. That was the whole and entire difference.

He was well regulated when he served. Before that he was not. That is what I have been telling you since the beginning. The right to keep and bear arms is his, not the militia’s.

Unorganized militias were Infringed, as People; by well regulated militias of the United States; just like it says in our Second Amendment.

No they were not. Citizens with privately owned firearms joined militias and fought to bring the confederate states back into the Union. The militias are regulated, as our 2nd amendment says. Private citizen’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, just like our 2nd amendment says.

 

[danielpalos]

The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

He was well regulated. That was the whole and entire difference.

He was well regulated when he served. Before that he was not. That is what I have been telling you since the beginning. The right to keep and bear arms is his, not the militia’s.

Unorganized militias were Infringed, as People; by well regulated militias of the United States; just like it says in our Second Amendment.

No they were not. Citizens with privately owned firearms joined militias and fought to bring the confederate states back into the Union. The militias are regulated, as our 2nd amendment says. Private citizen’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, just like our 2nd amendment says.

The entire South, was Infringed since they were unorganized militia.

 

[WinterBorn]

Let me help you understand. Let's make a hypothetical Civil War example.
Joe Smith, who fought with the Illinois 63rd Militia, brought his personal rifle when he joined the militia. The Illinois 63rd Militia was an organized militia. Joe was a part of an organized militia after he joined the Illinois 63rd. But he owned his gun and the 2nd amendment guarantees his right to keep & bear arms.

He was well regulated. That was the whole and entire difference.

He was well regulated when he served. Before that he was not. That is what I have been telling you since the beginning. The right to keep and bear arms is his, not the militia’s.

Unorganized militias were Infringed, as People; by well regulated militias of the United States; just like it says in our Second Amendment.

No they were not. Citizens with privately owned firearms joined militias and fought to bring the confederate states back into the Union. The militias are regulated, as our 2nd amendment says. Private citizen’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, just like our 2nd amendment says.

The entire South, was Infringed since they were unorganized militia.

The entire South took up arms against the federal govt. It had nothing to do with the 2nd amendment whatsoever.

 

[danielpalos]

He was well regulated. That was the whole and entire difference.

He was well regulated when he served. Before that he was not. That is what I have been telling you since the beginning. The right to keep and bear arms is his, not the militia’s.

Unorganized militias were Infringed, as People; by well regulated militias of the United States; just like it says in our Second Amendment.

No they were not. Citizens with privately owned firearms joined militias and fought to bring the confederate states back into the Union. The militias are regulated, as our 2nd amendment says. Private citizen’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, just like our 2nd amendment says.

The entire South, was Infringed since they were unorganized militia.

The entire South took up arms against the federal govt. It had nothing to do with the 2nd amendment whatsoever.

Yes, it did. The unorganized militia does not have an uninfringed right to keep and bear Arms, when it involves the security of our free States or the Union.

 

[WinterBorn]

He was well regulated when he served. Before that he was not. That is what I have been telling you since the beginning. The right to keep and bear arms is his, not the militia’s.

Unorganized militias were Infringed, as People; by well regulated militias of the United States; just like it says in our Second Amendment.

No they were not. Citizens with privately owned firearms joined militias and fought to bring the confederate states back into the Union. The militias are regulated, as our 2nd amendment says. Private citizen’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, just like our 2nd amendment says.

The entire South, was Infringed since they were unorganized militia.

The entire South took up arms against the federal govt. It had nothing to do with the 2nd amendment whatsoever.

Yes, it did. The unorganized militia does not have an uninfringed right to keep and bear Arms, when it involves the security of our free States or the Union.

Nonsense. The South was not attacked because their militia was unorganized.

And none of the militias that defeated the South were organized before the war started.