Ex-F.B.I. Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Durham Investigation

Democrats freaked out because Trump was corruptly manipulating with our ally, one who is too weak to fight back. You should freak out too, because this is the corrupt BS we criticize other countries of doing. Zelensky never wanted anything to do with our political campaign which is why Trumpā€™s administration had to corruptly pressure him to do so.

They didn't pressure him to do anything. He asked for favor but never said any aid was dependent on that favor. Ukraine didn't take it that way either as stated by them. Biden is the one that looks like a corrupt, career politician and Trump is merely trying to root out that corruption.

What happens when it doesn't materialize?

I guess we could follow the Democrats lead with their continued fantasy's regarding the Mueller probe.
fantasy?
It was proven true by the senate report released in the past few days



Delusional------------

Trump has nothing going on with the Russians---

While there is a huge easy to see money trail from PUtin to the Clinton foundation for Uranium---which oddly Mueller help the Russians and Hilliary with via PERSONALLY running Uranium samples to PUTIN in MOSCOW on one of those secret tarmac meetings that the clintons like to do.
 
Hey, libtards.

Lets say that Clinesmith altered a document to send YOU to jail.

NOW HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT IT?

I donā€™t recall anybody being sent to jail here. He lied on a FISA warrant application. Nobody died or went to jail.

All Trump did was ask a leader of another country to check out one of our corrupt politicians, and the commies impeached him over it. Nobody died there either.

Corruption is getting our allies to do his political dirty work.

We impeach corrupt politicians in this country.

Oh, you mean for our President to be accused (never proven) to do something the candidate for your party admitted to doing on tape? Our guy gets impeached, but your guy gets to run for President? Where is the equity in that?

Everything Biden did was out in the open, public knowledge, which is how we know it wasnā€™t corrupt.

Trump did his very best to hide what he did.

Should tell you something about the difference between the two situations.


Seriously? You really believe this? Biden is corrupt and his mind is gone----he has been extorting bribes from the Ukraine and taking bribes from China using his family's bank accounts---this is but the tip of the ice berg.

Not only do I believe it but I have lots of testimony to back it up. Your narrative has never been substantiated by anyone other than what the Trump DNI labels as Russian propaganda aimed to influence the election in Trump's favor.


Oh good grief---the FBI said that he wasn't lying before the FBI corrupt agents of Paige and Strzok changed other agents report and made up lies to put in it which is illegal and criminal.--
Comey flat out said that they weren't really interviewing that they were trying to force flynn to lie or obstruct in hopes of GETTING him fired---ergo not a criminal investigation but a political stunt and abuse of office and Flynn civil rights.


And yet the FACTS don't even phase the goofy Trump haters. It's crazy.

Youā€™re mischaracterizing this. The FBI never made a determination that Flynn didnā€™t lie. The interviewing agent said his body language didnā€™t seem like someone who had lied. Since when do we not prosecute people simply because theyā€™re really good at lying? The answer is obviously never, but that fact never manages to penetrate.

As for altering the report, it was Strzokā€™s report. He was one of two agents interviewing Flynn. Of course Strzok would edit the report, after all, he was signing his name to it. Coincidentally, so did the other agent. That fact doesnā€™t seem to penetrate either.

Flynn lied. To avoid his fate, all he had to do was tell the truth. Why was that so hard?


We don't prosecute people WHEN THERE IS NO CRIME and WHEN OUR AGENTS are partisan hacks who 1) DESTROY EVIDENCE, 2) MANUFACTURE FAKE EVIDENCE, 3) ABUSE THEIR POSITION TO LAUNCH POLITCAL WITCH HUNTS UNDER THE GUISE OF A FAKE INVESTIGATION, AND/OR 4) ABUSE THEIR POSITION TO TRY TO SET UP INNOCENT PEOPLE FOR PERJURY TRAPS AND/OR OBSTRUCTION TRAPS

It wasn't Strzok's report sweetheart----------strzok and Paige pretended to be Joe Pientka the other agent flat out, changed the other agents notes after he signed off on it, and then lied their azzes off on 3 (count them 3 different occasions) in court about who wrote the notes and who did the interview Then they destroyed or think they destroyed the original 302 three weeks after it was written and 2 days AFTER Flynn had resigned (the 302's are required to be completed within 5 days of the interview btw). Oh and Strzok claims that our supposed premier law enforcement agency didn't record their interrogation/witch hunt----------- since when does law enforcement not record interviews of suspects?

And btw, since the original 302 was destroyed or the coup thinks they destroyed the original with no trace.........where exactly are you coming up with with any agent saying that only the body language of flynn said that he wasn't lying?

"An intelligence source who had seen the transcripts of Flynnā€™s conversations with Kislyak told National Public Radio ā€” hardly a conservative news source ā€” in February 2017 that they did not show any criminal wrongdoing: ā€œI donā€™t think [Flynn] knew he was doing anything wrong ā€¦ Flynn talked about sanctions, but no specific promises were made. Flynn was speaking more in general ā€˜maybe weā€™ll take a look at this going forwardā€™ terms,ā€ the intelligence source told NPR."--Breitbart december 17, 2018

1. Evidence was not destroyed.
2. Evidence was not manufactured
3. Investigation was properly predicated.
4. It was not a perjury trap.

The 302 was not altered after Joe Pientka signed it. There was no "original 302" that was destroyed. The FBI does not routinely record interviews. That's what the agent's notes are for, both of which back up the 302 that was submitted. These are all false statements, perpetuated by right wing media with no basis in fact.

Where am I coming up with the body language? It's from Congressional testimony.
 
Democrats freaked out because Trump was corruptly manipulating with our ally, one who is too weak to fight back. You should freak out too, because this is the corrupt BS we criticize other countries of doing. Zelensky never wanted anything to do with our political campaign which is why Trumpā€™s administration had to corruptly pressure him to do so.

They didn't pressure him to do anything. He asked for favor but never said any aid was dependent on that favor. Ukraine didn't take it that way either as stated by them. Biden is the one that looks like a corrupt, career politician and Trump is merely trying to root out that corruption.

What happens when it doesn't materialize?

I guess we could follow the Democrats lead with their continued fantasy's regarding the Mueller probe.
fantasy?
It was proven true by the senate report released in the past few days



Delusional------------

Trump has nothing going on with the Russians---

While there is a huge easy to see money trail from PUtin to the Clinton foundation for Uranium---which oddly Mueller help the Russians and Hilliary with via PERSONALLY running Uranium samples to PUTIN in MOSCOW on one of those secret tarmac meetings that the clintons like to do.

Trump campaign, Russia had extensive contacts

A comprehensive list of contacts between members of the campaign and Russia were uncovered during the committeeā€™s bipartisan investigation, which launched shortly after Trump took office in January 2017.

Communications between several Russian figures and the campaign surfaced in other investigations by the House and Mueller, but the Senate probe uncovered additional information, including several cases where Russians had far greater ties to the Kremlin.

One such figure was Natalia Veselnitskaya, a lawyer Donald Trump Jr., former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner met at Trump Tower in June 2016 after being promised dirt on Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. Instead, Veselnitskaya steered the discussion toward Russian sanctions.

ā€œThe connections the Committee uncovered, particularly regarding Veselnitskaya, were far more extensive and concerning than what had been publicly known,ā€ the panel wrote, noting she was not forthcoming with her ties to Moscow.



on the Mueller uranium bit, youve got a mostly false rating:

 
Hey, libtards.

Lets say that Clinesmith altered a document to send YOU to jail.

NOW HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT IT?

I donā€™t recall anybody being sent to jail here. He lied on a FISA warrant application. Nobody died or went to jail.

All Trump did was ask a leader of another country to check out one of our corrupt politicians, and the commies impeached him over it. Nobody died there either.

Corruption is getting our allies to do his political dirty work.

We impeach corrupt politicians in this country.

Oh, you mean for our President to be accused (never proven) to do something the candidate for your party admitted to doing on tape? Our guy gets impeached, but your guy gets to run for President? Where is the equity in that?

Everything Biden did was out in the open, public knowledge, which is how we know it wasnā€™t corrupt.

Trump did his very best to hide what he did.

Should tell you something about the difference between the two situations.


Seriously? You really believe this? Biden is corrupt and his mind is gone----he has been extorting bribes from the Ukraine and taking bribes from China using his family's bank accounts---this is but the tip of the ice berg.

Not only do I believe it but I have lots of testimony to back it up. Your narrative has never been substantiated by anyone other than what the Trump DNI labels as Russian propaganda aimed to influence the election in Trump's favor.


Oh good grief---the FBI said that he wasn't lying before the FBI corrupt agents of Paige and Strzok changed other agents report and made up lies to put in it which is illegal and criminal.--
Comey flat out said that they weren't really interviewing that they were trying to force flynn to lie or obstruct in hopes of GETTING him fired---ergo not a criminal investigation but a political stunt and abuse of office and Flynn civil rights.


And yet the FACTS don't even phase the goofy Trump haters. It's crazy.

Youā€™re mischaracterizing this. The FBI never made a determination that Flynn didnā€™t lie. The interviewing agent said his body language didnā€™t seem like someone who had lied. Since when do we not prosecute people simply because theyā€™re really good at lying? The answer is obviously never, but that fact never manages to penetrate.

As for altering the report, it was Strzokā€™s report. He was one of two agents interviewing Flynn. Of course Strzok would edit the report, after all, he was signing his name to it. Coincidentally, so did the other agent. That fact doesnā€™t seem to penetrate either.

Flynn lied. To avoid his fate, all he had to do was tell the truth. Why was that so hard?


We don't prosecute people WHEN THERE IS NO CRIME and WHEN OUR AGENTS are partisan hacks who 1) DESTROY EVIDENCE, 2) MANUFACTURE FAKE EVIDENCE, 3) ABUSE THEIR POSITION TO LAUNCH POLITCAL WITCH HUNTS UNDER THE GUISE OF A FAKE INVESTIGATION, AND/OR 4) ABUSE THEIR POSITION TO TRY TO SET UP INNOCENT PEOPLE FOR PERJURY TRAPS AND/OR OBSTRUCTION TRAPS

It wasn't Strzok's report sweetheart----------strzok and Paige pretended to be Joe Pientka the other agent flat out, changed the other agents notes after he signed off on it, and then lied their azzes off on 3 (count them 3 different occasions) in court about who wrote the notes and who did the interview Then they destroyed or think they destroyed the original 302 three weeks after it was written and 2 days AFTER Flynn had resigned (the 302's are required to be completed within 5 days of the interview btw). Oh and Strzok claims that our supposed premier law enforcement agency didn't record their interrogation/witch hunt----------- since when does law enforcement not record interviews of suspects?

And btw, since the original 302 was destroyed or the coup thinks they destroyed the original with no trace.........where exactly are you coming up with with any agent saying that only the body language of flynn said that he wasn't lying?

"An intelligence source who had seen the transcripts of Flynnā€™s conversations with Kislyak told National Public Radio ā€” hardly a conservative news source ā€” in February 2017 that they did not show any criminal wrongdoing: ā€œI donā€™t think [Flynn] knew he was doing anything wrong ā€¦ Flynn talked about sanctions, but no specific promises were made. Flynn was speaking more in general ā€˜maybe weā€™ll take a look at this going forwardā€™ terms,ā€ the intelligence source told NPR."--Breitbart december 17, 2018

1. Evidence was not destroyed.
2. Evidence was not manufactured
3. Investigation was properly predicated.
4. It was not a perjury trap.

The 302 was not altered after Joe Pientka signed it. There was no "original 302" that was destroyed. The FBI does not routinely record interviews. That's what the agent's notes are for, both of which back up the 302 that was submitted. These are all false statements, perpetuated by right wing media with no basis in fact.

Where am I coming up with the body language? It's from Congressional testimony.
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Hey, libtards.

Lets say that Clinesmith altered a document to send YOU to jail.

NOW HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT IT?

I donā€™t recall anybody being sent to jail here. He lied on a FISA warrant application. Nobody died or went to jail.

All Trump did was ask a leader of another country to check out one of our corrupt politicians, and the commies impeached him over it. Nobody died there either.

Corruption is getting our allies to do his political dirty work.

We impeach corrupt politicians in this country.

Oh, you mean for our President to be accused (never proven) to do something the candidate for your party admitted to doing on tape? Our guy gets impeached, but your guy gets to run for President? Where is the equity in that?

Everything Biden did was out in the open, public knowledge, which is how we know it wasnā€™t corrupt.

Trump did his very best to hide what he did.

Should tell you something about the difference between the two situations.


Seriously? You really believe this? Biden is corrupt and his mind is gone----he has been extorting bribes from the Ukraine and taking bribes from China using his family's bank accounts---this is but the tip of the ice berg.

Not only do I believe it but I have lots of testimony to back it up. Your narrative has never been substantiated by anyone other than what the Trump DNI labels as Russian propaganda aimed to influence the election in Trump's favor.


Oh good grief---the FBI said that he wasn't lying before the FBI corrupt agents of Paige and Strzok changed other agents report and made up lies to put in it which is illegal and criminal.--
Comey flat out said that they weren't really interviewing that they were trying to force flynn to lie or obstruct in hopes of GETTING him fired---ergo not a criminal investigation but a political stunt and abuse of office and Flynn civil rights.


And yet the FACTS don't even phase the goofy Trump haters. It's crazy.

Youā€™re mischaracterizing this. The FBI never made a determination that Flynn didnā€™t lie. The interviewing agent said his body language didnā€™t seem like someone who had lied. Since when do we not prosecute people simply because theyā€™re really good at lying? The answer is obviously never, but that fact never manages to penetrate.

As for altering the report, it was Strzokā€™s report. He was one of two agents interviewing Flynn. Of course Strzok would edit the report, after all, he was signing his name to it. Coincidentally, so did the other agent. That fact doesnā€™t seem to penetrate either.

Flynn lied. To avoid his fate, all he had to do was tell the truth. Why was that so hard?


We don't prosecute people WHEN THERE IS NO CRIME and WHEN OUR AGENTS are partisan hacks who 1) DESTROY EVIDENCE, 2) MANUFACTURE FAKE EVIDENCE, 3) ABUSE THEIR POSITION TO LAUNCH POLITCAL WITCH HUNTS UNDER THE GUISE OF A FAKE INVESTIGATION, AND/OR 4) ABUSE THEIR POSITION TO TRY TO SET UP INNOCENT PEOPLE FOR PERJURY TRAPS AND/OR OBSTRUCTION TRAPS

It wasn't Strzok's report sweetheart----------strzok and Paige pretended to be Joe Pientka the other agent flat out, changed the other agents notes after he signed off on it, and then lied their azzes off on 3 (count them 3 different occasions) in court about who wrote the notes and who did the interview Then they destroyed or think they destroyed the original 302 three weeks after it was written and 2 days AFTER Flynn had resigned (the 302's are required to be completed within 5 days of the interview btw). Oh and Strzok claims that our supposed premier law enforcement agency didn't record their interrogation/witch hunt----------- since when does law enforcement not record interviews of suspects?

And btw, since the original 302 was destroyed or the coup thinks they destroyed the original with no trace.........where exactly are you coming up with with any agent saying that only the body language of flynn said that he wasn't lying?

"An intelligence source who had seen the transcripts of Flynnā€™s conversations with Kislyak told National Public Radio ā€” hardly a conservative news source ā€” in February 2017 that they did not show any criminal wrongdoing: ā€œI donā€™t think [Flynn] knew he was doing anything wrong ā€¦ Flynn talked about sanctions, but no specific promises were made. Flynn was speaking more in general ā€˜maybe weā€™ll take a look at this going forwardā€™ terms,ā€ the intelligence source told NPR."--Breitbart december 17, 2018

1. Evidence was not destroyed.
2. Evidence was not manufactured
3. Investigation was properly predicated.
4. It was not a perjury trap.

The 302 was not altered after Joe Pientka signed it. There was no "original 302" that was destroyed. The FBI does not routinely record interviews. That's what the agent's notes are for, both of which back up the 302 that was submitted. These are all false statements, perpetuated by right wing media with no basis in fact.

Where am I coming up with the body language? It's from Congressional testimony.


The 302 was altered after Joe Pientka signed it .....Joe signed the 302, 3 days after the interview (remember that 5 day rule that the FBI has for signing and turning in these forms)----the Fbi corrupt love birds changed what Pientka had wrote as they pretended to be him and actually were stupid enough to discuss their actions on text's back and forth leaving a trial. Sorry these be the facts. They will be going to jail if the clinton mob doesn't make them disappear first-----Comey and Page are song bird personalities..........they will be singing like a couple of canaries (hence it was a good ideal for Strkoz not to be dating Page anymore for him. He might live longer. I so so want to place a bet on which Fbi agents wind up dead first. These are not false statements by the right wing media---these are the facts that are known and have evidence to support them.

The FBI has several rules including one that states clearly from 2014 that FBI agents should default to recording their conversations----I would assume that this is especially the case in a HIGH PROFILE case that will be covered by the media non-stop and involves a HIGH ranking person who has supposedly committed some major crime including possibly TREASON and will go down in history. I mean this is what a reasonable law enforcement officer would do right? Unless of course the investigator is corrupt or exceptionally inept. This is what logic demands.

Oh and from THE VIEW 5/20 of this year:


"The FBIā€™s interview of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn about his telephone conversations with Russian Ambassador Kislyak renewed a frequent question: Why doesnā€™t the FBI record its interviews? After all, if a recording of Flynnā€™s January 2017 interview were available, and not just a heavily redacted form FD-302, there might not be such controversy about whether Flynn lied to agents about the conversation. Despite the fact that recorded interviews can be helpful, there are good reasons the FBI does not record all interviews ā€” even though a 2014 Department of Justice policy states they should default toward recordings.

First, an estimated 75 to 85 percent of a street agentā€™s work consists of interviewing people. These interviews come in the form of background investigations, criminal and intelligence investigations, source debriefings and other pertinent conversations. While itā€™s technically possible to record and store all such conversations, it would be a challenge. Next, if the policy was to record all interviews, then we would be in the same imbroglio that we are in with the Flynn case for any FBI interview that is not recorded. Questions would abound about why a non-recorded interview occurred.

Unlike some other law enforcement agencies, the FBI documents via the 302 case report all interviews, whether they are positive or negative. If agents conducted a canvass of a neighborhood in a bank robbery investigation, for example, a separate 302 would be completed for every individual with whom the agents talk, even if nobody saw anything. Other agencies might do one report reflecting that all the contacts were negative, or might not document anything. Many agencies that record interviews restrict them to subject (or suspect) interviews. They do not record witness interviews, and it has been suggested that the FBI do exactly this. "

Note, according to our corrupt FBI, namely Comey-----Flynn was not a witness but a SUSPECT at this point----no honest investigator would have NOT recorded this conversation. To claim otherwise is pure manipulation and foolishness."

You may also want to note typically with the FBI---one agent asks questions---while the other writes down the responses. The lying love bird asked the questions, while Pientka wrote down the responses and then wrote up and signed off on the original 302 that cheating Strzok later rewrote pretending to be Pientka. Strzok in his desperate attempt to try to cover himself LATER came up with his own notes of the interview ---funny thing though about them is that they are HAND printed with no cursive or short hand----must have been an interesting slow interview or he is just flat out lying about these notes too-----Pientka is going to be the man to ask and he has already said that the 302 that Strzok submitted was alter and fabricated.


Oh my----Comey's testimony is what you are basing your claims about what the original 302 had said? Comey is a habitural liar and perjurer about ready to go to prison. This wasn't the missing 302 but Comeys account which btw buries Strzok...........

What Comey said was based on his notes--- which was just released May 20 of this year after being declassifed by US District attorney Jeff Jension on 5-20-20 from an earlier testimony of our idiot Comey.-I had to retype from copied pictures of the notes----so I think it is accurate, but I may have made a typo or two. The original is at THE LAST REFUGE dated this year May 20, 2020.

"And the agents--and the reason why I mention their experience is because I talked to them about this --they discerned no physical indications of deception. They didn't see any change in posture, in tone, in inflection, in eye contact. They didn't see any indication that he knew that he was lying to them.

And they interviewed him completely, went through it all, and did not show him the transcript, (something blocked out), or transcripts, and then came back and drafted a 302 and reported to me and the Deputy Director.

And then briefed the White House on the contents of what Mr. Flynn had said. That is the 24th of January" .

There was nothing in Flynns testimony that shows that he was lying ------and please bloody note the date of the 24th of January.........this was the original 302 that went missing and had BEEN ALREADY FILED and reported on before Paige and Strzok stole it, destroyed it, and then manufactured a new 302 to replace it. Not the one that you keep trying to spin as an original made weeks later by our corrupt FBI love birds. The original signed and filed 302 that has been reported to state flat out that Flynn hadn't been lying is still OFFICIALLY missing at this point.........Comey and others have given their version of what was said on this officially missing document----------while others give a different account. The original writer is still around but kept oddly out of the limelight as he will certainly be testifying against our other corrupt FBI agents who destroyed the original they hope, and then pretended to be him as they manufacture a fake to replace his.
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.
 
Last edited:
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.
Iā€™m saying that your allegations arenā€™t substantiated.

You seemingly have the impression that Pientka never signed off on the official 302.

There is no way this could have happened without us knowing by now. Zero. And thereā€™s zero evidence it did happen.

Without any evidence of this allegation, your allegations crumble because thatā€™s the lynchpin.
 
Hey, libtards.

Lets say that Clinesmith altered a document to send YOU to jail.

NOW HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT IT?

I donā€™t recall anybody being sent to jail here. He lied on a FISA warrant application. Nobody died or went to jail.

All Trump did was ask a leader of another country to check out one of our corrupt politicians, and the commies impeached him over it. Nobody died there either.

Corruption is getting our allies to do his political dirty work.

We impeach corrupt politicians in this country.

Oh, you mean for our President to be accused (never proven) to do something the candidate for your party admitted to doing on tape? Our guy gets impeached, but your guy gets to run for President? Where is the equity in that?

Everything Biden did was out in the open, public knowledge, which is how we know it wasnā€™t corrupt.

Trump did his very best to hide what he did.

Should tell you something about the difference between the two situations.


Seriously? You really believe this? Biden is corrupt and his mind is gone----he has been extorting bribes from the Ukraine and taking bribes from China using his family's bank accounts---this is but the tip of the ice berg.

Not only do I believe it but I have lots of testimony to back it up. Your narrative has never been substantiated by anyone other than what the Trump DNI labels as Russian propaganda aimed to influence the election in Trump's favor.


Oh good grief---the FBI said that he wasn't lying before the FBI corrupt agents of Paige and Strzok changed other agents report and made up lies to put in it which is illegal and criminal.--
Comey flat out said that they weren't really interviewing that they were trying to force flynn to lie or obstruct in hopes of GETTING him fired---ergo not a criminal investigation but a political stunt and abuse of office and Flynn civil rights.


And yet the FACTS don't even phase the goofy Trump haters. It's crazy.

Youā€™re mischaracterizing this. The FBI never made a determination that Flynn didnā€™t lie. The interviewing agent said his body language didnā€™t seem like someone who had lied. Since when do we not prosecute people simply because theyā€™re really good at lying? The answer is obviously never, but that fact never manages to penetrate.

As for altering the report, it was Strzokā€™s report. He was one of two agents interviewing Flynn. Of course Strzok would edit the report, after all, he was signing his name to it. Coincidentally, so did the other agent. That fact doesnā€™t seem to penetrate either.

Flynn lied. To avoid his fate, all he had to do was tell the truth. Why was that so hard?

While the Trump Cult keeps trying to spin the Senate Intel Report on Russian Interference as yet another "nothing burger", this is the entire Senate Intel Committee not only tossing Donald J. Trump under the bus, but backing up and running over Trump's entire family and campaign staff for good measure: criminal referrals for Steve Bannon, Jared Kuchner and Donald J. Trump Jr.

No wonder Trump had the head of the Intel Committee investigated for insider trading. That's what happens when you're disloyal to Donald Trump. Back to jail, like Cohen. Go to jail for Chuck Grassly.

This Report backs up the Mueller Report and essentially says that Donald J. Trump committed perjury and lied to Robert Mueller, and he most certainly co-ordinated with Roger Stone and WikiLeaks. "I love WikiLeaks". The Senate Report also puts the final nail in the coffin of Barr's Investigations of the origins of the Russia investigation, and points out in spades that not only was the FBI investigation of the Trump Campaign's ties to Russia at the very highest level, but it also gives reasons as to why everyone in the Trump Campaign, from Jeff Sessions, to Jared Kuchner lied about their telephone calls and meetings with officials of the Russian government, including but not limited to Konstantin Kilimnik, Valentina Velnitskaya, Ambassador Kisslyak, and Vladimir Putin.

President Trump calls Kamala Harris a "nasty woman", but wishes a known child sex trafficker "well". He'll help save the world from Hilary Clinton's cannibal baby eaters, but Americans dying from covid19 well, "it is what it is". Donald Trump - saving the world from all the perils the tin foil hat brigade can imagine, while the country burns from the very real perils he ignores.

Trump is still building a wall no one needs, and ignoring the pandemic where everyone needs government help.
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.

You left out links to any sources which can verify these right wing fairy tales.
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.
Iā€™m saying that your allegations arenā€™t substantiated.

You seemingly have the impression that Pientka never signed off on the official 302.

There is no way this could have happened without us knowing by now. Zero. And thereā€™s zero evidence it did happen.

Without any evidence of this allegation, your allegations crumble because thatā€™s the lynchpin.


Oh nice try--but no cigar----You wish my allegations weren't substantiated. The evidence is CLEARLY there..........paper trails, texts, and emails and oh my gawd Comey and his big mouth....and already singing canaries. Next will be dead bodies ............I think before the 1st week November as the ensuing chaos will also be used to try to steal the election..
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.
Iā€™m saying that your allegations arenā€™t substantiated.

You seemingly have the impression that Pientka never signed off on the official 302.

There is no way this could have happened without us knowing by now. Zero. And thereā€™s zero evidence it did happen.

Without any evidence of this allegation, your allegations crumble because thatā€™s the lynchpin.


Oh nice try--but no cigar----You wish my allegations weren't substantiated. The evidence is CLEARLY there..........paper trails, texts, and emails and oh my gawd Comey and his big mouth....and already singing canaries. Next will be dead bodies ............I think before the 1st week November as the ensuing chaos will also be used to try to steal the election..
It clearly isnā€™t in this thread, that much we know.

We should all be suspicious of people who claim something exists but refuse to show it.
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.

You left out links to any sources which can verify these right wing fairy tales.


I've left nothing out...well except the texts as everyone already knows and have heard about Lisa Paige telling her lover how to rewrite the 302 to get Flynn....I figured if you are sophisticated enough to know about Comey's really stupid congressional testimony (which YOU directed me to) burying Strzok this year by admitting that the first 302 existed on January 24 (you know within the 5 days that the FBI is required to turn in their reports following an interveiw/interrogation/frame up) not the FEb 15 (3 weeks later) that you are trying to spin currently, that you would also know about the simpler stuff like the texts that have been out for what 2 years now between the two idiot fbi lovebirds seeking their insurance policy against Trump while "getting off" around Valentines Day.

Back in my single days, to spice up our love life we would just go have sex on a beach or somewhere else..not have sex while framing innocent people. That is just tacky. I made sure all my other posts had sources pasted on them with the location of where the information came from.. I'm hurt that you would claim otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Democrats freaked out because Trump was corruptly manipulating with our ally, one who is too weak to fight back. You should freak out too, because this is the corrupt BS we criticize other countries of doing. Zelensky never wanted anything to do with our political campaign which is why Trumpā€™s administration had to corruptly pressure him to do so.

They didn't pressure him to do anything. He asked for favor but never said any aid was dependent on that favor. Ukraine didn't take it that way either as stated by them. Biden is the one that looks like a corrupt, career politician and Trump is merely trying to root out that corruption.

What happens when it doesn't materialize?

I guess we could follow the Democrats lead with their continued fantasy's regarding the Mueller probe.
fantasy?
It was proven true by the senate report released in the past few days



Delusional------------

Trump has nothing going on with the Russians---

While there is a huge easy to see money trail from PUtin to the Clinton foundation for Uranium---which oddly Mueller help the Russians and Hilliary with via PERSONALLY running Uranium samples to PUTIN in MOSCOW on one of those secret tarmac meetings that the clintons like to do.
Yes, we get it. Your defense is that Trump was too incompetent to know what his campaign officials were doing. Good for you.
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.

You left out links to any sources which can verify these right wing fairy tales.


I've left nothing out...well except the texts as everyone already knows and have heard about Lisa Paige telling her lover how to rewrite the 302 to get Flynn....I figured if you are sophisticated enough to know about Comey's really stupid congressional testimony (which YOU directed me to) burying Strzok this year by admitting that the first 302 existed on January 24 (you know within the 5 days that the FBI is required to turn in their reports following an interveiw/interrogation/frame up) not the FEb 15 (3 weeks later) that you are trying to spin currently, that you would also know about the simpler stuff like the texts that have been out for what 2 years now between the two idiot fbi lovebirds seeking their insurance policy against Trump while "getting off" around Valentines Day.

Back in my single days, to spice up our love life we would just go have sex on a beach or somewhere else..not have sex while framing innocent people. That is just tacky. I made sure all my other posts had sources pasted on them with the location of where the information came from.. I'm hurt that you would claim otherwise.

Fascinating. What testimony are you referring to? Comey has a lot of different dates of testimony. Hard to find what one you're talking about.
 
Well this thread suddenly got very boring. Who cares about some inconsequential process crime, when Trump's toadies are getting arrested for multiple serious felonies?
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.

You left out links to any sources which can verify these right wing fairy tales.


I've left nothing out...well except the texts as everyone already knows and have heard about Lisa Paige telling her lover how to rewrite the 302 to get Flynn....I figured if you are sophisticated enough to know about Comey's really stupid congressional testimony (which YOU directed me to) burying Strzok this year by admitting that the first 302 existed on January 24 (you know within the 5 days that the FBI is required to turn in their reports following an interveiw/interrogation/frame up) not the FEb 15 (3 weeks later) that you are trying to spin currently, that you would also know about the simpler stuff like the texts that have been out for what 2 years now between the two idiot fbi lovebirds seeking their insurance policy against Trump while "getting off" around Valentines Day.

Back in my single days, to spice up our love life we would just go have sex on a beach or somewhere else..not have sex while framing innocent people. That is just tacky. I made sure all my other posts had sources pasted on them with the location of where the information came from.. I'm hurt that you would claim otherwise.

Fascinating. What testimony are you referring to? Comey has a lot of different dates of testimony. Hard to find what one you're talking about.


Purposely Obtuse..........No one can make you admit the facts colfax---you are proof positive that no matter how much evidence is presented and ALREADY put in the thread with the link-----------that demtrolls will still keep playing childish games. The funny part is that the demtrolls think that the adults in the room don't see what is going on. Hate to tell you that they do though----------
 
Palm plant!!! You are B-E-Y-O-N-D any help.....the fbi has bloody admitted to lying about the 302, altering the 302, and changing after Pientka signed it off--
Okay. Show me. Show me where the FBI admitted such a thing.

Pientka didnā€™t sign off on the 302 and then it later was edited. He signed off on it when it was officially filed on Feb 15.


Gee you like to ignore the obvious don't you----------------the FBI has just 5 days to have their 302 completed not 3 weeks later.....

On February 10, Pientka left town------------Strzok and Paige rewrote his 302 that he had already signed off on after he left and then turned it into McCABE on the 15th.

I left out the juicy parts of the texts and emails between these two idiots during this time as Paige is an blooming airhead and she and her married lover incriminated themselves. The airhead claimed that the original 302 was garbage and then instructed her married lover on how to specifically rewrite it while pretending to be the other now missing agent (who one of the right wing conspirator writers is now saying is hiding out at Kirkland Air Force Base losing track of weapons and receiving a poor grade as an administrator but this part I don't about. Weird that he like "the Cambridge Professor involved in the Papadoupoulus case are being hidden or in the professors case claimed dead when he wasn't by our FBI.

You left out links to any sources which can verify these right wing fairy tales.


I've left nothing out...well except the texts as everyone already knows and have heard about Lisa Paige telling her lover how to rewrite the 302 to get Flynn....I figured if you are sophisticated enough to know about Comey's really stupid congressional testimony (which YOU directed me to) burying Strzok this year by admitting that the first 302 existed on January 24 (you know within the 5 days that the FBI is required to turn in their reports following an interveiw/interrogation/frame up) not the FEb 15 (3 weeks later) that you are trying to spin currently, that you would also know about the simpler stuff like the texts that have been out for what 2 years now between the two idiot fbi lovebirds seeking their insurance policy against Trump while "getting off" around Valentines Day.

Back in my single days, to spice up our love life we would just go have sex on a beach or somewhere else..not have sex while framing innocent people. That is just tacky. I made sure all my other posts had sources pasted on them with the location of where the information came from.. I'm hurt that you would claim otherwise.

Fascinating. What testimony are you referring to? Comey has a lot of different dates of testimony. Hard to find what one you're talking about.


Purposely Obtuse..........No one can make you admit the facts colfax---you are proof positive that no matter how much evidence is presented and ALREADY put in the thread with the link-----------that demtrolls will still keep playing childish games. The funny part is that the demtrolls think that the adults in the room don't see what is going on. Hate to tell you that they do though----------
I looked over every post of yours in this thread and saw no link to Comeyā€™s testimony saying such a thing.

One of two things is going to happen. One, youā€™re going to refuse to produce a link. Or two, youā€™re going to point me to testimony saying something completely different and unrelated.

This story is just bogus. Totally bogus. It even includes nutty murder conspiracies.

Comey never said there was an original signed 302. Pientka signed the 302 on Feb 15th.
 

Forum List

Back
Top