That's likely because people are not critical these days, they value presentation over content, he's a zero, intellectually empty, emperor's new clothes etc.
Most of the people who drove the scientific revolution were creationists.
IQ is over rated though, it measure one's ability to do IQ tests and that's about it.
The thread is about estimating his IQ.
IQ, the measurement of which that you just said is overrated.
Yes I think IQ is overrated, that's distinct from what the actual IQ is of Peterson.
I've upset you? good.
No, he's not that. I though you were interested in a decent discussion
Perhaps overrated? I mentioned 'aptitude' but I think I'm wasting my time with you. If you reply can't clear my bar then we're finished.
From someone who goes by Sherlock Holmes with the IQ of Al Sharpton?
No Sir, I do not "go by" as you put it, I am Sherlock Holmes, consulting detective.
With the IQ of Al Sharpton?
No idea, he doesn't brag about it as JP does.
Al Sharpton bragging about his IQ is like you calling yourself Sherlock Holmes.
I should tell you, he's known as the stupid man's smart person, just remember that.
