Enrique Tarrio harasses former officer Fanone

[Correll]

Right, like segregation was deemed reasonable to many once.

It's about showing how trumpanzees cannot bring themselves to renounce domestic terrorists.

Yes, the issue is that Tarrio is upset that police served as witnesses at his trial.

his trial about the "planning of the insurrection"?

Was the officer an undercover officer at the planning session?


What did the officer say, that tarrio is unhappy about?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

his trial about the "planning of the insurrection"?

Was the officer an undercover officer at the planning session?

What did the officer say, that tarrio is unhappy about?

Go and read the news.

 

[Correll]

Did you hear about his riot? How about the cancer charity that he robbed or the rigged hole-in-one contest he was fined for? Would you turn on trump if he raped your mother, daughter or wife in the middle of Main Street? I don`t explain anything to cult members whether they follow Trump, David Koresh or leftover Jimmy Jones worshippers.

So, when asked what the issue of this thread is about, you immedately start bringing up other topics?

That indicates very, very strongly that YOU believe that Tarrio was right to confront this officer, that this officer is the bad guy here.


Whoa. Thatt's interesting. That even a hard core lefty like you, can't defend what this lefty cop did.

 

[Correll]

Go and read the news.

YOU started a thread on it. The other lefty poster is trying to derail your thread since we are asking questions about what the cop did.

That makes it look like the Proud Boy is in the right.

THe way you are afraid to talk about it, also makes hte proud boy look like the good guy.


If I started a thread like this, I would have included the accusation in teh op and explained why I thought it was bullshit.


You seem afraid to even try to do that.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

how is this specific officer relevant to any of that?

You're asking me why Tarrio publicly harasses police officers? Ask Tarrio.

Oh and save the spin for someone that might care about it. It makes you look like a child. And a partisan zealot.

Is showing disdain for fascism deemed "partisan" in your world?

 

[Oddball]

What did the officer say, that tarrio is unhappy about?

Likely lied out his ass on the witness stand, like all three of the sobbing crisis actor "Capitol Police" did in numerous J6-er trials.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Officer Fanone has made himself into a public figure, by writing a book and becoming a CNN contributor and Democrat activist.

If he's in public, journalists are allowed to shout questions to him. Happens to every other politician. I hate to think what might have happened to Tarrio in a room full of cops if not for the cameras.

 

[August West]

So, when asked what the issue of this thread is about, you immedately start bringing up other topics?

That indicates very, very strongly that YOU believe that Tarrio was right to confront this officer, that this officer is the bad guy here.


Whoa. Thatt's interesting. That even a hard core lefty like you, can't defend what this lefty cop did.

Tarrio and the rest of the goons should have been eliminated on J6.

 

[Correll]

Likely lied out his ass on the witness stand, like all three of the sobbing crisis actor "Capitol Police" did in numerous J6-er trials.

That would explain the behavior of sherlock holmes.


Would you ever start a thread, without including the core issue of the topic in the op and why you supported or opposed that...thing?

 

[Correll]

Tarrio and the rest of the goons should have been eliminated on J6.

And despite massive prompting, you still are afraid to discuss the actual issue of the op.


Doubling down to advocating for mass murder, is not... a supporting argument. You realize that you are making your side look worse with each post, right?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

YOU started a thread on it. The other lefty poster is trying to derail your thread since we are asking questions about what the cop did.

Asking questions is fine, all part of the discussion of the report.

That makes it look like the Proud Boy is in the right.

Not to me.

THe way you are afraid to talk about it, also makes hte proud boy look like the good guy.

I'm not afraid, I just cannot answer for Tarrio's harrasment.

If I started a thread like this, I would have included the accusation in teh op and explained why I thought it was bullshit.

That's your prerogative.

You seem afraid to even try to do that.

Tarrio is scum, that's my position, you admire him.

 

[Oddball]

That would explain the behavior of sherlock holmes.


Would you ever start a thread, without including the core issue of the topic in the op and why you supported or opposed that...thing?

You think you're going to get any intellectual honesty out of a career bloodsucking bureaucrat?

 

[Correll]

Asking questions is fine, all part of the discussion of the report.

Not to me.

I'm not afraid, I just cannot answer for Tarrio's harrasment.

That's your prerogative.

Tarrio is scum, that's my position, you admire him.

The other lefty has escalated to advocating for mass murder now.

YOu have convinced me that Tarrio was railroaded by lying cops in his original conviction.

And I'm serious about that. Before this, I thought he was guilty but over charged.

Now, I think that his conviction was COMPLETELY FALSE and unjust.


I was open to the idea that he was just pissed off from his time in prison. But your fear of even giving his side for discussion?


YOu have convinced me he is in the right.


He clearly convinced you. Because you are afraid to even show his words, in order to then explain why you disagree.


DO YOU REALIZE THAT YOUR BEHAVIOR SHOWS THAT YOU THINK THE PROUD BOY IS RIGHT?

 

[Mac1958]

This is fruit of the MAGA tree, its foul smelling and foul tasting fruit.

MAGA loves this. The more cruel, the more ugly, the more aggressive, the better.

Another example of how they're replaced Jesus with Trump. Trump's all about this stuff. He validates it with his own behaviors.

Thread 'The Psychology of MAGA'

Feb 15, 2025

If we were to identify ourselves as MAGA and non-MAGA (which includes Americans across the political spectrum), perhaps we can all agree on one thing:

MAGAs appear to get enjoyment -- real enjoyment -- out of seeing non-MAGAs in some kind of distress over MAGA's actions. They cheer on Trump's constant insults and trolling, JD Vance's attacks on our former European allies, reactions to news of the rapid dismantling of the government, the release of violent Capitol criminals. They celebrate it.

So I got to wondering what this is, from a psychological perspective, and I asked Chat...

• Mac1958
• Replies: 593
• Forum: Health and Lifestyle

• 
• 
• 

 

[Correll]

You think you're going to get any intellectual honesty out of a career bloodsucking bureaucrat?

nope.

 

[Correll]

MAGA loves this. The more cruel, the more ugly, the more aggressive, the better.

Another example of how they're replaced Jesus with Trump. Trump's all about this stuff. He validates it with his own behaviors.

Thread 'The Psychology of MAGA'

Feb 15, 2025

If we were to identify ourselves as MAGA and non-MAGA (which includes Americans across the political spectrum), perhaps we can all agree on one thing:

MAGAs appear to get enjoyment -- real enjoyment -- out of seeing non-MAGAs in some kind of distress over MAGA's actions. They cheer on Trump's constant insults and trolling, JD Vance's attacks on our former European allies, reactions to news of the rapid dismantling of the government, the release of violent Capitol criminals. They celebrate it.

So I got to wondering what this is, from a psychological perspective, and I asked Chat...

• Mac1958
• Replies: 593
• Forum: Health and Lifestyle

• 
• 
• 

If the accusasation of a false testimony is true and Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years falsely,

would you still side against the Proud Boy, for daring to confront the bad cop that was part of it?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Officer Fanone has made himself into a public figure, by writing a book and becoming a CNN contributor and Democrat activist.

View attachment 1082262

If he's in public, journalists are allowed to shout questions to him. Happens to every other politician. I hate to think what might have happened to Tarrio in a room full of cops if not for the cameras.

Well firstly journalists are not "allowed" to only question someone who is known to the public, they can and do question all sorts of people, famous, infamous and unknown.

Second Tarrio isn't a journalist.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Well firstly journalists are not "allowed" to only question someone who is known to the public, they can and do question all sorts of people, famous, infamous and unknown.

True, enough. But if a journalist followed me shouting questons at me about a policy or action of my district's school board, I'd have a more reasonable complaint than if I were a member of that school board who ran for office.

Point is that it is absurd for Mr. Fanone to complain about "harrassment."

Second Tarrio isn't a journalist.

If he is questioning public figures for publication, he absolutely is a journalist. The first amendment allows anyone to be a journalist, not just those selected by government, or by CNN.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

This is fruit of the MAGA tree, its foul smelling and foul tasting fruit. Tarrio feels it appropriate to insult and intimidate people who simply did their duty as law enforcement officers on Jan 6. In the Trump world, evil is good, lies are truth, criminals are heroes and peace officers are despised.

Anyone who supports Trump also supports this kind of behavior, this kind of society.

so, when a deranged lefty SCREAMS at a person for an hour then grabs them that is free speech and such, but this is harassment? Go figure.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The other lefty has escalated to advocating for mass murder now.

YOu have convinced me that Tarrio was railroaded by lying cops in his original conviction.

With which post did I achieve that?

And I'm serious about that. Before this, I thought he was guilty but over charged.

Not being a juror and not seeing all of the evidence the jury saw your opinion is of little import.

Now, I think that his conviction was COMPLETELY FALSE and unjust.

Why am I not surprised to read your words...

I was open to the idea that he was just pissed off from his time in prison. But your fear of even giving his side for discussion?

Once again you retard, I did not interview Tarrio I have not asked him questions, I saw the video and I followed the Jan 6 trials closely and I regard Tarrio as scum. You keep asking me for "his side of the story" you'll need to ask him or find another report about this where he gives his "side".

YOu have convinced me he is in the right.

That's you prerogative.

He clearly convinced you. Because you are afraid to even show his words, in order to then explain why you disagree.

I cited a newspaper article, as for his words you can hear him speaking in the video, so again why do you keep asking me? I'm not Enrique Trashio.

DO YOU REALIZE THAT YOUR BEHAVIOR SHOWS THAT YOU THINK THE PROUD BOY IS RIGHT?

You are free to draw whatever conclusions you like, even if they are fascist, you have that right.