What? A long skreed of single quotes that doesnt share with us any of Trumps responses? That is 'shredding' someone?
Were one engaging in critical thought, one would try to get BOTH sides of this discussion, but Matthew, you are citing an attack piece that fails to even give a sock puppet defense of Trump it is so completely one sided.
Is that what passes of rational objective thought these days?
It is simply astonishing that a woman who fraudulently claims to be an Amerindian, makes $350k annually and lives in a million dollar mansion is presenting herself as the defender of the poor and downtrodden.
Despite all the rhetoric from Warren about the Wall Street fiasco, and she is justified in her rage, I dont get the impression she really understands the completely unregulated derivatives market $600 TRILLION+ Leviathon that could crush any single nations economy with a hiccup like the one in 2008? If she does, then why isnt she talking more about that instead of getting into the weeds of pushouts and other arcane legal wrangling items that only a legal accountant could appreciate? I have seen Sanders discuss this some, but not Warren, which makes me suspect she is as much of a financial expert as she is Amerindian.
And what about some of her slams on Trump as a 'loser'; WTF? They say she is trying to out-Trump Trump, but that is not the kind of thing Trump does. Trump 'rebrands' people by taking truthful things and focusing attention on them like Jeb!s 'low energy'. Dude, Jeb! is nothing if not low energy. Take for example that speech he gave in Floriduh where he had to clue the audience in to applaud after he woke them up. Trump nailed that one, and his summation of Ted Cruz as 'Lying Ted', which rang true to anyone that dug into Cruz' career of exaggerating his opponents nonConservative statements. Again Trump made it stick because people could see that there was an element of Truth to it.
But Warrens characterization of Trump as a loser? Give me a break; how is a multi-trillion dollar successful businessman in one of the toughest real estate markets in the world, who is also a successful author and TV star for 12 years running, how is such man even remotely a 'loser'? That does not stick except to a delusional ignoramus or an ideologue and comes nowhere close to rebranding Trump. Warren is just blowing gas out of her pie hole.
Warren has also called Trump a demagogue but that seems hypocrital coming from a fake Cherokee who got into Harvard by pushing her Amerindian minority status that was simply bullshit.
Trump Responds To Elizabeth Warrenās Criticism By Calling Her āThe Indianā Of course, she now says she only did that so she could meet other Amerindians on the faculty; lol, yeah, no kidding, complete horse shit.
And talk about ducking regulations and failing to disclose assets, how did she miss her $1.3 million line of credit from Bank of America? Why does that not count as much as anyone elses financial assistance from a bank? Why does it not raise questions about whether Warren is sold goods?
Trump Responds To Elizabeth Warrenās Criticism By Calling Her āThe Indianā
While Elizabeth Warren presents herself as a champion of the Middle Class, what has she accomplished other than getting her own party pissed with her? Obama has slammed on her efforts against global trade, etc, and she sounds kind of like the Democrat version of Ted Cruz, but I dont see anything she has accomplished for anyone, much like Hillary. Two women who run on their credentials and ticket punched resume but who have no accomplishments to show for it other than holding office itself.
At least Trump has built some buildings, sold a bunch of books and became a TV star for 12 years straight. And that makes idiots like Warren consider him a loser? Only in the insane world of politics and academia.
