So I can't help but notice that no one is talking about the elephant in the room....actually the elephant in all the rooms...the oval office...the congress...and the senate.
Now that the money required to support the AGW scam is going to start drying up, does anyone care to make a prediction on how long it will take for the AGW hypothesis to begin to rapidly lose favor in mainstream science in favor of a hypothesis that gives a much more prominent place to natural variation and drops CO2?
Could this be the beginning of some actual science being done with regard to the climate and what drives it?
Climatologists from all varieties of the political spectrum from all over the world make up the scientific consensus that humankind is accelerating the rate at which the global climate is warming. That isn't going to change just because Republicans run this one country.
What's going to change are any policies in place currently to deal with climate and any money to research climate change. And any official recognition of the scientific evidence that supports accelerated climate change.
Your opinion that AGW is some sort of hoax is due to your partisan and cultural socio-economic bias and getting your information from internet blogs and Facebook posts, and also your lack of comprehension when it comes to science; not because you've done any objective reading of the scholarly articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals and interpreted the original data differently from the experts in climatology.