Elena Kagan to be nominated for supreme court
- Thread starter Cal
- Start date
Zander
Platinum Member
so what? ....your post should have your opinion about the news. Otherwise it's just spam.
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
So Rabbi, how is it living in 1955?
jillian
Princess
really? interesting. perhaps on other boards you've haunted. not here.
there is nothing inappropriate or 'spam' about providing information.
or do i have to go through every rightwingnut thread to show you what spam is?
I figured Obama would pander to the Gay community and nominate a Lesbian or a Transsexual.
I guess he's still looking for a cross-dresser or some guy with a boob-job to fill the next opening.
I guess he's still looking for a cross-dresser or some guy with a boob-job to fill the next opening.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Indeed. Considering YL's post was the first on the subject, it most certainly is not spam.
jillian
Princess
they weren't even like that in 1955 as far as i know.
he can't help being a loser. is what he is.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
True, I suppose ignorance doesn't really have a date. It just exists.
He's right. She puts the UGH in Ugly.
You're just jealous that Obama didnt nominate you. I guess you aren't enough of a dyke to qualify.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
And between you and Mud, I'm sure you two are just male models of the year.
If either of you are as ugly as your personalities, don't even bother posting a picture.
jillian
Princess
just because a woman wouldn't touch you with a ten foot pole doesn't mean she's a dyke. it just means you're gross.
and you know the old... 'it isn't you, it's me'.
don't beiieve that... it's always you.
And between you and Mud, I'm sure you two are just male models of the year.
If either of you are as ugly as your personalities, don't even bother posting a picture.
I'm not getting nominated for a political position either.
You were trying to make some kind of point, dumbshit?
Zander
Platinum Member
Good for you. I prefer to get my own news. I come here to view other peoples opinion about the news.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Since when does looks matter for a political position?
Yeah, my point is you make snide remarks about the looks of others while hiding behind your computer like the coward you are.
Grow up and man up. You embarrass all real men.
Anyway.
Obama declared that there was no litmus test on abortion for a nominee. Did anyone really expect him to nominate someone who wants to overturn Roe? C'mon.
Kagan has a long track record on abortion, if I recall correctly. This will make the nomination very divisive, leading to another knock down drag out Fuck You America show from the Democrats. Way to go!
Fuck.
Kagan is a terrible, but predictable, choice. She's as careerist as they come, has practically no discernible record, is obsequious to power and claims of expanded executive privilege, and will move the court further to the right when Obama should so obviously be using his majority to move it to the left (especially after Roberts and Sc'Alito and with the departure of the court's most liberal member) or at least keep it status quo.
This is another sad day for progressives, who Obama continues to let down.
What makes the move so particularly dunderheaded is that Diane Wood was also at the top of the list of potential nominees, has a long and sterling record, is an appropriate replacement for Stevens in terms of their rulings, is an actual federal judge with plenty of judicial experience and progressive credentials, and would have had an easier confirmation.
Kagan is a terrible, but predictable, choice. She's as careerist as they come, has practically no discernible record, is obsequious to power and claims of expanded executive privilege, and will move the court further to the right when Obama should so obviously be using his majority to move it to the left (especially after Roberts and Sc'Alito and with the departure of the court's most liberal member) or at least keep it status quo.
This is another sad day for progressives, who Obama continues to let down.
What makes the move so particularly dunderheaded is that Diane Wood was also at the top of the list of potential nominees, has a long and sterling record, is an appropriate replacement for Stevens in terms of their rulings, is an actual federal judge with plenty of judicial experience and progressive credentials, and would have had an easier confirmation.
Last edited:
Similar threads
