Egyptian Journalist Describes 'Absolute Prosperity' in Gaza

[daveman]

Are you saying that sources like the League of Nations charter, the UN charter, and the Yale Law Review are "Jew-killing terrorists?"

How can you say something like that and expect people to take you seriously?

I don't expect you to take me seriously. I don't want every Jew in the Middle East dead.

WOW, Dave, I have never said anything like that. I have always advocated peace.

Uh huh. Somehow, I've never seen any Jews in your vision of "peace".

 

[georgephillip]

^^ Oh the delusional mind of the forums largest troll George.

You are pretty much lost in hate regardless of the platform.

You look for the platforms to spew your inner hate..

How much "inner hate" is required to kill another human being for money?
Does your "god-of-the-collection-plate" help sanctify your theft?

 

[Ropey]

Are you saying that sources like the League of Nations charter, the UN charter, and the Yale Law Review are "Jew-killing terrorists?"

How can you say something like that and expect people to take you seriously?

I don't expect you to take me seriously. I don't want every Jew in the Middle East dead.

WOW, Dave, I have never said anything like that. I have always advocated peace.

What utter balderash PF. You vomit your desire to end Israel daily and put a 58th Muslim Islamic country in its place.

We know what Arabs do to Jews and Christians already in the 57 Muslim countries.

Thanks but no.

 

[georgephillip]

Along with the eighth most widely quoted author in history?

Yes. He's stupid, too.

Are Chomsky, the World Court and Security Council being stupid when they label Israel's West Bank settlements clear violations of international law.

There's no shortage of legitimate sources who dispute that claim.

Are you too stupid to find them?

Or is calling names pretty much all you've got?

Chomsky, the World Court and the Security Council are all irrational Israel haters.

Only other irrational Israel haters would see them as having unbiased views.

"More than 100 states already recognize Palestine.

"The United Kingdom, France and other European nations have upgraded the Palestine General Delegation to 'diplomatic missions and embassies – a status normally reserved only for states,' Victor Kattan observes in the American Journal of International Law."

Irrational Israel haters?

Conservative are on the wrong side of History again.
Just like they were on the wrong side of the fight against segregation in the US.
What part of universal freedom scares you most?

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

 

[Ropey]

^^ Oh the delusional mind of the forums largest troll George.

You are pretty much lost in hate regardless of the platform.

You look for the platforms to spew your inner hate..

How much "inner hate" is required to kill another human being for money?
Does your "god-of-the-collection-plate" help sanctify your theft?

Who do you think you are to ask such questions of another human being George?

One man gets that from you eh?

You are sick.

 

[daveman]

Along with the eighth most widely quoted author in history?

Yes. He's stupid, too.

Are Chomsky, the World Court and Security Council being stupid when they label Israel's West Bank settlements clear violations of international law.

There's no shortage of legitimate sources who dispute that claim.

Are you too stupid to find them?

Or is calling names pretty much all you've got?

Chomsky, the World Court and the Security Council are all irrational Israel haters.

Only other irrational Israel haters would see them as having unbiased views.

"More than 100 states already recognize Palestine.

"The United Kingdom, France and other European nations have upgraded the Palestine General Delegation to 'diplomatic missions and embassies – a status normally reserved only for states,' Victor Kattan observes in the American Journal of International Law."

Irrational Israel haters?

Can someone point out this alleged nation on a map? NOTE: A REAL map, not the one you Jew-haters use.

Conservative are on the wrong side of History again.
Just like they were on the wrong side of the fight against segregation in the US.

Republicans led the fight for civil rights. Democrats opposed it. Moron.

What part of universal freedom scares you most?

Univeral -- except for Jews, right?

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

Truthout? Oh, yeah -- "Rove will be indicted in 24 business hours!"

Only retards accept Out of Truth as a legitimate source.

 

[georgephillip]

^^ Oh the delusional mind of the forums largest troll George.

You are pretty much lost in hate regardless of the platform.

You look for the platforms to spew your inner hate..

How much "inner hate" is required to kill another human being for money?
Does your "god-of-the-collection-plate" help sanctify your theft?

Who do you think you are to ask such questions of another human being George?

One man gets that from you eh?

You are sick.

Not sick enough to kill a human being for money, Ropey.
What about you?

 

[P F Tinmore]

I don't expect you to take me seriously. I don't want every Jew in the Middle East dead.

WOW, Dave, I have never said anything like that. I have always advocated peace.

What utter balderash PF. You vomit your desire to end Israel daily and put a 58th Muslim Islamic country in its place.

We know what Arabs do to Jews and Christians already in the 57 Muslim countries.

Thanks but no.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jp-_ydl_28&feature=related]YouTube - ‪A Palestian talks about the Nakba -4/4‬‏[/ame]

 

[georgephillip]

Yes. He's stupid, too.

Chomsky, the World Court and the Security Council are all irrational Israel haters.

Only other irrational Israel haters would see them as having unbiased views.

"More than 100 states already recognize Palestine.

"The United Kingdom, France and other European nations have upgraded the Palestine General Delegation to 'diplomatic missions and embassies – a status normally reserved only for states,' Victor Kattan observes in the American Journal of International Law."

Irrational Israel haters?

Can someone point out this alleged nation on a map? NOTE: A REAL map, not the one you Jew-haters use.

Republicans led the fight for civil rights. Democrats opposed it. Moron.

What part of universal freedom scares you most?

Univeral -- except for Jews, right?

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

Truthout? Oh, yeah -- "Rove will be indicted in 24 business hours!"

Only retards accept Out of Truth as a legitimate source.

Stay tuned for that upcoming map, Dave.
Possibly some time in September.

Point out a few Republicans who "led the fight for civil rights."

Conservatives (and Liberals) in both parties opposed integration for different reasons.
Republicans conjured Nixon's "Southern Strategy" and your hero kicked off his 1980 presidential bid in Philadelphia, Mississippi, 16 years after the lynching of three civil rights activists in the same town.

"States Rights"
Right?

 

[P F Tinmore]

They sure teach you people a lot of hate.

 

[daveman]

"More than 100 states already recognize Palestine.

"The United Kingdom, France and other European nations have upgraded the Palestine General Delegation to 'diplomatic missions and embassies – a status normally reserved only for states,' Victor Kattan observes in the American Journal of International Law."

Irrational Israel haters?

Can someone point out this alleged nation on a map? NOTE: A REAL map, not the one you Jew-haters use.

Republicans led the fight for civil rights. Democrats opposed it. Moron.

Univeral -- except for Jews, right?

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

Truthout? Oh, yeah -- "Rove will be indicted in 24 business hours!"

Only retards accept Out of Truth as a legitimate source.

Stay tuned for that upcoming map, Dave.
Possibly some time in September.

And to your eternal sorrow, it will still have Israel on it. Tough shit.

Point out a few Republicans who "led the fight for civil rights."

Conservatives (and Liberals) in both parties opposed integration for different reasons.
Republicans conjured Nixon's "Southern Strategy" and your hero kicked off his 1980 presidential bid in Philadelphia, Mississippi, 16 years after the lynching of three civil rights activists in the same town.

"States Rights"
Right?

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[daveman]

They sure teach you people a lot of hate.

Whereas your hatred of Israel is, what -- normal?

 

[P F Tinmore]

They sure teach you people a lot of hate.

Whereas your hatred of Israel is, what -- normal?

The Palestinians hold the legal and moral high ground.

Yet people hate me for defending their position.

 

[daveman]

They sure teach you people a lot of hate.

Whereas your hatred of Israel is, what -- normal?

The Palestinians hold the legal and moral high ground.

Not by killing Israelis civilians, they don't.

Yet people hate me for defending their position.

I don't hate you. I just think you're stupid for being such a willing tool for terrorists.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Whereas your hatred of Israel is, what -- normal?

The Palestinians hold the legal and moral high ground.

Not by killing Israelis civilians, they don't.

Yet people hate me for defending their position.

I don't hate you. I just think you're stupid for being such a willing tool for terrorists.

BLAMING THE VICTIM IN GAZA

Traditionally, British media reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been heavily biased in favour of the United States' major ally in the region, Israel. A 2002 Glasgow University Media Group report found that television broadcasters were six times as likely to present Israeli attacks as "retaliating" or in some way hitting back as Palestinian attacks. This caused many viewers to believe that the Palestinians were to blame for the conflict.

The media have emphasised the capture of the Israeli soldier as key in escalating tensions. On June 29, Stephen Farrell reported in The Times "a dramatic escalation of the conflict sparked by the abduction". (Farrell, 'Tanks go into Gaza as Jewish settler is murdered,' The Times, June 29, 2006)

On June 30, the Financial Times reported "the rapid escalation of the crisis sparked by last Sunday's kidnap" (Ferry Biedermann and Roula Khalaf, 'Abbas appeals to UN over arrests,' Financial Times, June 30, 2006). The BBC described the Palestinian attack as "a major escalation in cross-border tensions". (BBC World News, June 25, 2006)

Few readers will be aware that on June 24, the day before the "kidnapping", Israeli commandos had entered the Gaza Strip and captured two Palestinians claimed by Israel to be members of Hamas. (See our Guest Media Alert by Jonathan Cook, 'Kidnapped by Israel'; )

Nor have the press suggested that the one-sided nature of the killing in the weeks leading up to the capture of the Israeli soldier might have "sparked" Palestinian actions.

On June 8, the Israeli army assassinated the recently appointed Palestinian head of the security forces of the Interior Ministry, Jamal Abu Samhadana, and three others. On June 9, Israeli shells killed seven members of the same family picnicking on Beit Lahiya beach. Some 32 others were wounded, including 13 children.

On June 13, an Israeli plane fired a missile into a busy Gaza City street, killing 11 people, including two children and two medics. On June 20, the Israeli army killed three Palestinian children and injured 15 others in Gaza with a missile attack. On June 21, the Israelis killed a 35-year old pregnant woman, her brother, and injured 11 others, including 6 children. Then came the Israeli capture of two Palestinians, followed by the Palestinian capture of the Israeli soldier and the killing of the two other soldiers.

Using the term "terrorist" to describe Palestinians is just Israeli propaganda.

 

[daveman]

The Palestinians hold the legal and moral high ground.

Not by killing Israelis civilians, they don't.

I don't hate you. I just think you're stupid for being such a willing tool for terrorists.

BLAMING THE VICTIM IN GAZA

Traditionally, British media reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been heavily biased in favour of the United States' major ally in the region, Israel. A 2002 Glasgow University Media Group report found that television broadcasters were six times as likely to present Israeli attacks as "retaliating" or in some way hitting back as Palestinian attacks. This caused many viewers to believe that the Palestinians were to blame for the conflict.

The media have emphasised the capture of the Israeli soldier as key in escalating tensions. On June 29, Stephen Farrell reported in The Times "a dramatic escalation of the conflict sparked by the abduction". (Farrell, 'Tanks go into Gaza as Jewish settler is murdered,' The Times, June 29, 2006)

On June 30, the Financial Times reported "the rapid escalation of the crisis sparked by last Sunday's kidnap" (Ferry Biedermann and Roula Khalaf, 'Abbas appeals to UN over arrests,' Financial Times, June 30, 2006). The BBC described the Palestinian attack as "a major escalation in cross-border tensions". (BBC World News, June 25, 2006)

Few readers will be aware that on June 24, the day before the "kidnapping", Israeli commandos had entered the Gaza Strip and captured two Palestinians claimed by Israel to be members of Hamas. (See our Guest Media Alert by Jonathan Cook, 'Kidnapped by Israel'; )

Nor have the press suggested that the one-sided nature of the killing in the weeks leading up to the capture of the Israeli soldier might have "sparked" Palestinian actions.

On June 8, the Israeli army assassinated the recently appointed Palestinian head of the security forces of the Interior Ministry, Jamal Abu Samhadana, and three others. On June 9, Israeli shells killed seven members of the same family picnicking on Beit Lahiya beach. Some 32 others were wounded, including 13 children.

On June 13, an Israeli plane fired a missile into a busy Gaza City street, killing 11 people, including two children and two medics. On June 20, the Israeli army killed three Palestinian children and injured 15 others in Gaza with a missile attack. On June 21, the Israelis killed a 35-year old pregnant woman, her brother, and injured 11 others, including 6 children. Then came the Israeli capture of two Palestinians, followed by the Palestinian capture of the Israeli soldier and the killing of the two other soldiers.

Using the term "terrorist" to describe Palestinians is just Israeli propaganda.

When they fire weapons into civilian areas, yes, they're terrorists. Calling them anything else is just terrorist propaganda.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not by killing Israelis civilians, they don't.

I don't hate you. I just think you're stupid for being such a willing tool for terrorists.

BLAMING THE VICTIM IN GAZA

Traditionally, British media reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been heavily biased in favour of the United States' major ally in the region, Israel. A 2002 Glasgow University Media Group report found that television broadcasters were six times as likely to present Israeli attacks as "retaliating" or in some way hitting back as Palestinian attacks. This caused many viewers to believe that the Palestinians were to blame for the conflict.

The media have emphasised the capture of the Israeli soldier as key in escalating tensions. On June 29, Stephen Farrell reported in The Times "a dramatic escalation of the conflict sparked by the abduction". (Farrell, 'Tanks go into Gaza as Jewish settler is murdered,' The Times, June 29, 2006)

On June 30, the Financial Times reported "the rapid escalation of the crisis sparked by last Sunday's kidnap" (Ferry Biedermann and Roula Khalaf, 'Abbas appeals to UN over arrests,' Financial Times, June 30, 2006). The BBC described the Palestinian attack as "a major escalation in cross-border tensions". (BBC World News, June 25, 2006)

Few readers will be aware that on June 24, the day before the "kidnapping", Israeli commandos had entered the Gaza Strip and captured two Palestinians claimed by Israel to be members of Hamas. (See our Guest Media Alert by Jonathan Cook, 'Kidnapped by Israel'; )

Nor have the press suggested that the one-sided nature of the killing in the weeks leading up to the capture of the Israeli soldier might have "sparked" Palestinian actions.

On June 8, the Israeli army assassinated the recently appointed Palestinian head of the security forces of the Interior Ministry, Jamal Abu Samhadana, and three others. On June 9, Israeli shells killed seven members of the same family picnicking on Beit Lahiya beach. Some 32 others were wounded, including 13 children.

On June 13, an Israeli plane fired a missile into a busy Gaza City street, killing 11 people, including two children and two medics. On June 20, the Israeli army killed three Palestinian children and injured 15 others in Gaza with a missile attack. On June 21, the Israelis killed a 35-year old pregnant woman, her brother, and injured 11 others, including 6 children. Then came the Israeli capture of two Palestinians, followed by the Palestinian capture of the Israeli soldier and the killing of the two other soldiers.

Using the term "terrorist" to describe Palestinians is just Israeli propaganda.

When they fire weapons into civilian areas, yes, they're terrorists. Calling them anything else is just terrorist propaganda.

Palestine has no military. All Palestinians are civilians.

 

[abu afak]

Using the term "terrorist" to describe Palestinians is just Israeli propaganda.

When they fire weapons into civilian areas, yes, they're terrorists. Calling them anything else is just terrorist propaganda.

Palestine has no military. All Palestinians are civilians.

What an IDIOT your are Tinhead.

So who killed the 1000+ Israelis in the Arab-Started Intifada since 2000?

If it's only 'civilians' then Israel has a right to defend itself against that classification YOU use.

And further, all those Fake Palestinian death toll classifications/Totals should read 100% Civilians/non-combatants. Which they Do NOT even claim.
-
-

 

[P F Tinmore]

When they fire weapons into civilian areas, yes, they're terrorists. Calling them anything else is just terrorist propaganda.

Palestine has no military. All Palestinians are civilians.

What an IDIOT your are Tinhead.

So who killed the 1000+ Israelis in the Arab-Started Intifada since 2000?

If it's only 'civilians' then Israel has a right to defend itself against that classification YOU use.

And further, all those Fake Palestinian death toll classifications/Totals should read 100% Civilians/non-combatants. Which they Do NOT even claim.
-
-

And the Palestinians, too, have the right to defend themselves against Israeli "civilians."

So who killed the 1000+ Israelis

A drop in the bucket compared to Israeli terrorism.

You are missing the point.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine has no military. All Palestinians are civilians.

What an IDIOT your are Tinhead.

So who killed the 1000+ Israelis in the Arab-Started Intifada since 2000?

If it's only 'civilians' then Israel has a right to defend itself against that classification YOU use.

And further, all those Fake Palestinian death toll classifications/Totals should read 100% Civilians/non-combatants. Which they Do NOT even claim.
-
-

And the Palestinians, too, have the right to defend themselves against Israeli "civilians."

So who killed the 1000+ Israelis

A drop in the bucket compared to Israeli terrorism.

You are missing the point.

You are close to the point. "Civilian" is not the definitive term to determine terrorism.
"Protected persons" is the term used in international law. Not all civilians are protected persons. Palestinian militants are not. Israeli settlers are not. Both are legitimate targets.