Earth is not warming, CO2 fraud is a $20 trillion act of treason against America, and well, we're waiting on Pam Bondi....

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
31,104
Reaction score
18,324
Points
2,788
Earth is not warming, or more precisely has not warmed at all in the past 50+ years. There is zero actual evidence it has warmed. There is only fudged data to support the claim of warming, except the one slice of the planet that has warmed, the surface of growing urban areas...



Otherwise

No warming in atmosphere - satellites, balloons, surface air pressure
No warming in the oceans = no breakout in cane activity
No ongoing net ice melt = no ocean rise = no rise in surface air pressure


Our media is 100% involved with this fraud, including the "conservative" ones who host faux skeptics who do not want CO2 FRAUD ended since they love being paid to go on Fox and RAV etc to make fun of it. Those "faux skeptics" are just as guilty as the "climate scientists" who have done nothing but lie and fudge data, and worse, much worse, attempted murder etc.


Can the media actually ask basic climate questions?


It has been two years, and the answer is still "no" from all media including Fox...







This is the surface air pressure of Mars. It documents that as Mars gets closer to Sun on its elliptical orbit, Mars SAP goes up, as all forms of air pressure are correlated with temperature.


See the source image




The problem for CO2 FRAUD is that Earth SAP is NOT going up, and hence proves Earth is neither warming nor experiencing an ongoing net ice melt.


They are even still using the old definition of "ice age" that is wrong and was formed prior to understanding of tectonic plate movement. Mars and Pluto have "ice caps" at the poles. Earth would too if not for H2O having a state of liquid, which "blots out" our "polar ice caps" where there is no land. 90% of Earth ice is on Antarctica, 7% is on Greenland....

those ARE ICE AGES... duh...


 
The Earth has been slowly warming for a century. Climate change is real no matter how many times you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la.la.la.la.la at the top of your voice.
 
The Earth has been slowly warming for a century. Climate change is real no matter how many times you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la.la.la.la.la at the top of your voice.
The climate has been warming for the last few centuries, ever since the end of the little ice age. Even if the industrial revolution had not occurred we would still be in a warming period.

Not saying that AGW isn't real. But the climate has been getting warmer all on its own too.
 
  • Fake News
Reactions: EMH
The Earth has been slowly warming for a century. Climate change is real no matter how many times you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la.la.la.la.la at the top of your voice.
So many lies have caused belief questions. Get India and China to clean it up to where the United States is now instead of destroying our nation.
 
Earth is not warming, or more precisely has not warmed at all in the past 50+ years. There is zero actual evidence it has warmed. There is only fudged data to support the claim of warming, except the one slice of the planet that has warmed, the surface of growing urban areas...



Otherwise

No warming in atmosphere - satellites, balloons, surface air pressure
No warming in the oceans = no breakout in cane activity
No ongoing net ice melt = no ocean rise = no rise in surface air pressure


Our media is 100% involved with this fraud, including the "conservative" ones who host faux skeptics who do not want CO2 FRAUD ended since they love being paid to go on Fox and RAV etc to make fun of it. Those "faux skeptics" are just as guilty as the "climate scientists" who have done nothing but lie and fudge data, and worse, much worse, attempted murder etc.


Can the media actually ask basic climate questions?


It has been two years, and the answer is still "no" from all media including Fox...







This is the surface air pressure of Mars. It documents that as Mars gets closer to Sun on its elliptical orbit, Mars SAP goes up, as all forms of air pressure are correlated with temperature.


See the source image




The problem for CO2 FRAUD is that Earth SAP is NOT going up, and hence proves Earth is neither warming nor experiencing an ongoing net ice melt.


They are even still using the old definition of "ice age" that is wrong and was formed prior to understanding of tectonic plate movement. Mars and Pluto have "ice caps" at the poles. Earth would too if not for H2O having a state of liquid, which "blots out" our "polar ice caps" where there is no land. 90% of Earth ice is on Antarctica, 7% is on Greenland....

those ARE ICE AGES... duh...



On the other side of this:
1. Is Alaska and Canada's Arctic generally warming?


2. Will the warming of Alaska and Canada's Arctic lead to the release of a lot of METHANE from permafrost?

3. Does METHANE have an "insulating factor" that is more than 7000 percent higher than the insulation value of carbon dioxide?




Methane (
��4
𝐶𝐻4

) and Carbon Dioxide (
��2
𝐶𝑂2

) both drive atmospheric warming but operate on vastly different timescales and with different intensities. While
��2
𝐶𝑂2

is the most prevalent human-caused greenhouse gas, responsible for roughly 76% of warming, methane is significantly more potent per molecule and accounts for about 30% of current global warming.
Comparative Warming Impact
The warming impact of these gases is often compared using Global Warming Potential (GWP), which measures how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will absorb over a given period of time relative to 1 ton of
��2
𝐶𝑂2

.


Atmospheric Lifetime~12 yearsCenturies to millennia
GWP (20-year period)81 to 87 times stronger than
��2
𝐶𝑂2
1 (Reference)
GWP (100-year period)28 to 36 times stronger than
��2
𝐶𝑂2
1 (Reference)
Primary RoleSets the pace for near-term warmingPrimary driver of long-term warming

[th]
Metric

[/th][th]
Methane (
��4
𝐶𝐻4
) Impact

[/th][th]
Carbon Dioxide (
��2
𝐶𝑂2
) Impact

[/th]​



Key Differences in Warming Behavior

  • Potency vs. Persistence: Methane is "powerful but fleeting." It is much more efficient at trapping radiation because its molecular structure allows for more "dance moves" (vibrational and rotational modes) to absorb infrared light. However, it breaks down relatively quickly.
    ��2
    𝐶𝑂2
    is less potent per molecule but accumulates steadily, making its warming effect near-permanent.
  • Warming Thresholds: Because methane is so potent in the short term, cutting its emissions is considered the fastest way to immediately slow the rate of global warming and avoid "tipping points" like melting polar ice caps.
  • Indirect Warming Effects: Unlike
    ��2
    𝐶𝑂2
    , methane is chemically active. Its breakdown in the atmosphere leads to the production of tropospheric ozone (
    �3
    𝑂3
    ) and stratospheric water vapor, both of which are also greenhouse gases that contribute to further warming.
  • Biological Feedback: Methane-induced ozone can damage plants, reducing their ability to act as "carbon sinks" that absorb
    ��2
    𝐶𝑂2
    , indirectly increasing the concentration of
    ��2
    𝐶𝑂2
    in the atmosphere.
Primary Sources

  • Carbon Dioxide: Primarily released through burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas), deforestation, and industrial processes like cement production.
  • Methane: Main sources include the production and transport of fossil fuels (leaks), agricultural activities (livestock and rice cultivation), and the decay of organic waste in landfills.
Policy Implications
Stabilizing global temperatures requires
��2
𝐶𝑂2

emissions to reach net zero because they accumulate indefinitely. In contrast, because methane is destroyed at a regular rate, the atmosphere can reach an equilibrium where constant (non-increasing) methane emissions lead to a stable but elevated temperature. Reducing methane emissions below current levels can actually provide a near-term cooling effect.
Would you like me to look into specific methane reduction technologies for the energy or agricultural sectors


To my thinking this brings us back to the New Mexico biologist and bicycling Coach Carl Cantrell alternative theory on stabilization of the climate.


Carl Cantrell :
"So how is our problem of continental drying causing global warming? It all has to do with vegetation and sunlight. When sun light hits a plant, it causes a process which we call photosynthesis where the energy from the sun light creates oxygen for us to breathe, water for us to drink, and is stored as sugar for plants and animals to use. When the same sun light hits the soil, all of its energy turns into heat and is radiated back into the atmosphere.. ."

"Therefore, the less vegetation you have on the planet, the more sunlight is being turned into heat and the warmer the planet becomes...."

"Just take a look at any satellite picture of the earth showing heat and you will see that our deserts are the warmest spots on the planet by far. More heat is being generated by just one of the top four or five deserts than by all of our cities combined.... "

"The truth is that you can do more to decrease global warming by just reducing the average temperature for the Sahara Desert by one or two degrees than if we humans completely quit using fossil fuels and returned to the cave…."

"So, how would you start working to resolve this problem? Easy, cool the deserts and get some vegetation growing on them as soon as possible. But the method is much more complex than that. You have to use the prevailing trade winds in relation to the deserts to get the best results as quickly as possible and it will be extremely expensive…."

"Then we build desalination plants along the coast near these water sheds and pipe water to the tops or ridges of the water sheds…"

"We need to start working on this as soon as possible because, if the planet reaches a point to where it is warming faster than our technology can possibly stop or reverse this warming trend, then our planet is lost and all life will cease to exist on this planet within a relatively short period of time. We will need to start with the largest and hottest deserts because cooling them will have the greatest benefit in the least time (Global Warming II by biologist Carl Cantrell)."
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
The Earth has been slowly warming for a century. Climate change is real no matter how many times you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la.la.la.la.la at the top of your voice.
You live on earth. How could you miss the fact the last century was cold due to Solar minimum. We are in Solar Maximum now so the sun has made it warmer.
How ridiculous that you think you can fix the earth. It doesn't need one bit of help from you.
 
The Earth has been slowly warming for a century. Climate change is real no matter how many times you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la.la.la.la.la at the top of your voice.
The earth has been warming back to its normal temp for like a million years.

The vast majority of earth's life, there was no ice.
 
  • Fake News
Reactions: EMH
I can’t imagine why, she doesn’t do shit except chase cameras and cover for pedos.
Any American that thinks if they side with the democrats, they will be shown mercy when the purges begin, are fooling themselves.
 
You live on earth. How could you miss the fact the last century was cold due to Solar minimum. We are in Solar Maximum now so the sun has made it warmer.
How ridiculous that you think you can fix the earth. It doesn't need one bit of help from you.
One has to remember that Jackie is mostly retarded and does not leave her safe echo chamber.
 
The Earth has been slowly warming for a century. Climate change is real no matter how many times you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la.la.la.la.la at the top of your voice.



Another IQ<5 science invalid.

Climate change is real, Earth does warm and cool, Jurassic was warmer, wetter, and much higher surface air pressure, what happens when Earth has little to no land near the poles and hence little to no ice.

Global Warming, that CO2 has anything to do with Earth climate change, is 100% pure bullshit, always was.


And you can't even answer the basic climate questions in the OP....
 
15th post
Is Alaska and Canada's Arctic generally warming?



Alaska and all of North America have been warming for tens of millions of years, because the NA tectonic plate is moving SW, away from North Pole.

Arctic Ocean is growing because of that, and as it grows further away from North Pole, it gets warmer.

That should not be confused with planetary warming. Continents warm, cool, and go in and out of ice age based upon movement relative to the poles.

During the last 3 million years,

Greenland gained 700k cubic miles of ice.

Antarctica likely gained less than that, since AA is a much older ice age, but it gains ice every year

North America lost 5+ million cubic miles of ice...


So during the last 3 million years, was Earth warming or cooling, or is Earth's average temperature mostly about how much ice is on the planet, and that is all about where land is and where the land is moving.... with continents freezing and melting at the same time.
 
You live on earth. How could you miss the fact the last century was cold due to Solar minimum. We are in Solar Maximum now so the sun has made it warmer.
How ridiculous that you think you can fix the earth. It doesn't need one bit of help from you.



Solar cycle is CO2 FRAUD "faux skeptic" bullshit.

Greenland froze while North America thawed at the same time.... Sun did not do that.
 
Another IQ<5 science invalid.

Climate change is real, Earth does warm and cool, Jurassic was warmer, wetter, and much higher surface air pressure, what happens when Earth has little to no land near the poles and hence little to no ice.

Global Warming, that CO2 has anything to do with Earth climate change, is 100% pure bullshit, always was.


And you can't even answer the basic climate questions in the OP....
Please state the nature of your climate science butthurt...:auiqs.jpg:
 
Back
Top Bottom