Durham Explained

[Grumblenuts]

The five-year statute of limitations appears to have passed for Durham to charge Sussmann with crimes related to his CIA meeting. Sussmann maintains that he had no reason to doubt the information that he passed along to the CIA. Beyond that, the Durham inquiry is ongoing, but it’s unclear if he if has the goods to indict anyone else or allege a broader anti-Trump conspiracy.

 

[lantern2814]

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Triggered!

"The coming indictments." Isn't that precious.

Hey dumbfuck, there’s already been one indictment. If there’s even one more more, leave here forever piss drinker. Put up or shut up. Yes you are triggered you racist retard.

 

[surada]

I

Lol. Sure they did ... unusual volumes according to whom? Set up.

It's no secret that US banks won't touch Trump and his source has been Russian money through Deutsch bank and bank of Cyprus. Why do you think he appointed Wilbur Ross?

 

[schmidlap]

the media continues to remain afraid of durhams report.

"The media" has been focused upon Durham's investigation, and all you know of it is through "the media."

In fact, Durham is so concerned about how an ideological, propagandistic faction of "the media" has distorted it, he has availed himself of "the media" to redress its fake claims:

Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing​

The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.​

​

John H. Durham, the Trump-era special counsel scrutinizing the investigation into Russia’s 2016 election interference, distanced himself on Thursday from false reports by right-wing news outlets that a motion he recently filed said Hillary Clinton’s campaign had paid to spy on Trump White House servers.​

​

Some pissy boys have been whining "Lock her up! Lock her up!" for years, and were chagrined when a quadrennium of rabid Trumpery failed to contrive a single pretext for an actual indictment.

 

[Aldo Raine]

he’s a cultist…when your cult leaders are xiden, obama and clinton…you have to expect he lies

ROTFLMFAO, says people that believe tRump AND "stolen election." I mean you just can't make this shit up!!!!!!
MAGA

 

[schmidlap]

...you just can't make this shit up!!!!!!

"Of course I can!"
​

 

[struth]

ROTFLMFAO, says people that believe tRump AND "stolen election." I mean you just can't make this shit up!!!!!!
MAGA

well "stolen election" is a rather open ended term....depends what you mean by it

 

[Aldo Raine]

well "stolen election" is a rather open ended term....depends what you mean by it

Ask tRump, he has the answers. So does Rudy, the Kraken Lady, Mike Pillow and the rightwing nutters nuz!!!!!
MAGA

 

[Delldude]

I
It's no secret that US banks won't touch Trump and his source has been Russian money through Deutsch bank and bank of Cyprus. Why do you think he appointed Wilbur Ross?

Because he reminded him of the Mr Ed show.

 

[Delldude]

"The media" has been focused upon Durham's investigation, and all you know of it is through "the media."

In fact, Durham is so concerned about how an ideological, propagandistic faction of "the media" has distorted it, he has availed himself of "the media" to redress its fake claims:

Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing​

The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.​

​

John H. Durham, the Trump-era special counsel scrutinizing the investigation into Russia’s 2016 election interference, distanced himself on Thursday from false reports by right-wing news outlets that a motion he recently filed said Hillary Clinton’s campaign had paid to spy on Trump White House servers.​

​

Some pissy boys have been whining "Lock her up! Lock her up!" for years, and were chagrined when a quadrennium of rabid Trumpery failed to contrive a single pretext for an actual indictment.

So no direct quote from Durham.....LOL

Sounds like you Trump loving leftists here.

 

[schmidlap]

So no direct quote from Durham..

Certainly not anything that would dredge up the pissy malcontents again screeching, "Lock her up! Lock her up!"

 

[Synthaholic]

Durham Dismisses Crazed Fox Reporting on Trump Spying Claims

Fox News wrongly cited a Durham motion as evidence that the Clinton campaign spied on Trump.

www.thedailybeast.com

 

[Synthaholic]

End thread. The wingnuts will now slink away, defeated by facts once again.

 

[Nostra]

End thread. The wingnuts will now slink away, defeated by facts once again.

Don't know how you think the Dailybeast is a credible source.

 

[Synthaholic]

Don't know how you think the Dailybeast is a credible source.

 

[Delldude]

Certainly not anything that would dredge up the pissy malcontents again screeching, "Lock her up! Lock her up!"

Yet it had similar effect upon the left.

 

[Delldude]

Durham Dismisses Crazed Fox Reporting on Trump Spying Claims

Fox News wrongly cited a Durham motion as evidence that the Clinton campaign spied on Trump.

www.thedailybeast.com

He didn't specifically mention Fox News now, did he?

 

[Nostra]

He didn't specifically mention Fox News now, did he?

Surely the Daily Beast wouldn’t lie.

 

[schmidlap]

Yet it had similar effect upon the left.

You are the spokesperson for your "left," apparently, but don't bother screeching, "Lock her up! Lock her up!" at Durham.

The Cry Baby Loser and his lickspittles spun Durham's filing, falsely claiming that said Hillary Clinton had paid operatives to spy on Trump's campaign and presidency.

Durham said no such thing in the document.

 

[Lesh]

Durham had to cover his ass with this

“If third parties or members of the media have overstated, understated or otherwise misinterpreted facts contained in the government’s motion, that does not in any way undermine the valid reasons for the government’s inclusion of this information.”

In other words..."I take no responsibility for how other people misinterpret the purposely vague bullshit I included in a motion concerning a potential conflict of interest that I admit could be resolved with Sussman signing a waiver...that I never actually asked him to sign"