Due to DOGE, control of our personal data is now held by one company (Palantir).

Luckyone

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2024
Messages
7,431
Reaction score
4,228
Points
908
Location
Florida
Due to DOGE, control of our personal data is now held by one company, Palantir!

Palantir is a company that is keying on AI and as such (and with the power of our data now included) has soared in price in the stock market. The stock has triple in price over the past 2 months, from a price of 66.12 to 135.28.

This is certainly great for stock market investors, but what does this control of our personal data and use of AI mean to you and me.

AI Overview

Control of personal data by a single company can pose several risks and potential harms to individuals
.
Here's how:
1. Data Breaches and Identity Theft:
  • Increased Risk: The more personal data a company holds, the more appealing a target it becomes for hackers.
  • Consequences: If sensitive data like names, Social Security numbers, or credit card details are exposed, it can lead to fraud, identity theft, and other harmful consequences.
2. Predatory or Unfair Practices:
  • Targeted Manipulation: Companies can use collected data to create detailed profiles and serve highly personalized, potentially harmful ads, like promoting predatory loans or targeting individuals with health-related vulnerabilities.
  • Price Discrimination: Companies with extensive data may use it to personalize pricing based on individual preferences, potentially leading to unfair or opaque pricing strategies.
  • Biased Outcomes: If data used for creating consumer scores reflects existing biases, it can result in discriminatory outcomes in areas like loan applications or job prospects.
3. Erosion of Privacy and Autonomy:
  • Reduced Anonymity: Comprehensive data collection reduces individual anonymity and can lead to a feeling of being constantly monitored.
  • Loss of Control: Users may be unaware of how their data is being used and sold, leading to a loss of control over their personal information.
  • Invasive Inferences: Data brokers can use seemingly unrelated information to infer sensitive details about individuals, such as health conditions or sexual orientation, which can then be used for targeted manipulation or discriminatory practices.
4. Limited Competition and Innovation:
  • Data Monopolies: When a few companies control vast amounts of data, it becomes difficult for competitors to enter the market or compete effectively, potentially stifling innovation.
  • Suppressed Innovation: Emerging companies may struggle to obtain the data needed to develop new products or services, hindering technological progress.
5. Other Potential Harms:
  • Intellectual Property Threats: Poor data management can lead to the accidental or malicious leaking of sensitive company data, affecting competitiveness.
  • Political Targeting: Data can be used to target individuals with tailored political messages during election campaigns.
  • Law Enforcement Access: Data brokers may sell personal data to government agencies and law enforcement, raising concerns about surveillance and lack of oversight.
In essence, a single company having extensive control over personal data raises concerns about security vulnerabilities, the potential for manipulation, a loss of individual autonomy, and a negative impact on market competition and innovation.

Having said that, Palantir is not a company that has a good and positive reputation:

Why don't people like Palantir?

As an example of the evil nature of Palantir's work, it appears that Palantir has been working with the Israeli military in so-called 'targeted killings'. Reports have suggested such that these murders, probably in the thousands or tens of thousands, utilized social media information and cellphone tracking.

and from AI

AI Overview

Palantir, a data analytics company known for its software used by government agencies, is often criticized for privacy concerns, its reliance on public sector contracts, and its perceived connection to controversial figures and ideologies. Specifically, Palantir's software is used to analyze vast amounts of data, raising concerns about the potential for misuse and the erosion of privacy. Additionally, the company's reliance on government contracts, particularly with agencies like the CIA and FBI, has led to accusations of being a tool of surveillance and oppression.

What does that mean to you and me? Well, it means you can be targeted negatively, you can be prevented from getting benefits due to you, or even being accused unfairly of something. You are no longer in total control of your life but dependent on a company that you don't even know about or have any relationship with. In other words, you are now a puppet and not an owner of your privacy/information.

Here in Jon Stewart interviewing Carole Cadwalladr, who was doing the investigating on the company (as well as others benefiting from DOGE) and found reasons for taking these companies to court (where they were found to be guilty) but in the end, they avoided having to pay and she was the one that ended "paying the price"



This is all about our rights to freedom and to our personal information remaining private to "our choosing" and not to the choosing of others
 
Due to DOGE, control of our personal data is now held by one company, Palantir!

Palantir is a company that is keying on AI and as such (and with the power of our data now included) has soared in price in the stock market. The stock has triple in price over the past 2 months, from a price of 66.12 to 135.28.

This is certainly great for stock market investors, but what does this control of our personal data and use of AI mean to you and me.

AI Overview

Control of personal data by a single company can pose several risks and potential harms to individuals
.
Here's how:
1. Data Breaches and Identity Theft:
  • Increased Risk: The more personal data a company holds, the more appealing a target it becomes for hackers.
  • Consequences: If sensitive data like names, Social Security numbers, or credit card details are exposed, it can lead to fraud, identity theft, and other harmful consequences.
2. Predatory or Unfair Practices:
  • Targeted Manipulation: Companies can use collected data to create detailed profiles and serve highly personalized, potentially harmful ads, like promoting predatory loans or targeting individuals with health-related vulnerabilities.
  • Price Discrimination: Companies with extensive data may use it to personalize pricing based on individual preferences, potentially leading to unfair or opaque pricing strategies.
  • Biased Outcomes: If data used for creating consumer scores reflects existing biases, it can result in discriminatory outcomes in areas like loan applications or job prospects.
3. Erosion of Privacy and Autonomy:
  • Reduced Anonymity: Comprehensive data collection reduces individual anonymity and can lead to a feeling of being constantly monitored.
  • Loss of Control: Users may be unaware of how their data is being used and sold, leading to a loss of control over their personal information.
  • Invasive Inferences: Data brokers can use seemingly unrelated information to infer sensitive details about individuals, such as health conditions or sexual orientation, which can then be used for targeted manipulation or discriminatory practices.
4. Limited Competition and Innovation:
  • Data Monopolies: When a few companies control vast amounts of data, it becomes difficult for competitors to enter the market or compete effectively, potentially stifling innovation.
  • Suppressed Innovation: Emerging companies may struggle to obtain the data needed to develop new products or services, hindering technological progress.
5. Other Potential Harms:
  • Intellectual Property Threats: Poor data management can lead to the accidental or malicious leaking of sensitive company data, affecting competitiveness.
  • Political Targeting: Data can be used to target individuals with tailored political messages during election campaigns.
  • Law Enforcement Access: Data brokers may sell personal data to government agencies and law enforcement, raising concerns about surveillance and lack of oversight.
In essence, a single company having extensive control over personal data raises concerns about security vulnerabilities, the potential for manipulation, a loss of individual autonomy, and a negative impact on market competition and innovation.

Having said that, Palantir is not a company that has a good and positive reputation:

Why don't people like Palantir?

As an example of the evil nature of Palantir's work, it appears that Palantir has been working with the Israeli military in so-called 'targeted killings'. Reports have suggested such that these murders, probably in the thousands or tens of thousands, utilized social media information and cellphone tracking.

and from AI

AI Overview

Palantir, a data analytics company known for its software used by government agencies, is often criticized for privacy concerns, its reliance on public sector contracts, and its perceived connection to controversial figures and ideologies. Specifically, Palantir's software is used to analyze vast amounts of data, raising concerns about the potential for misuse and the erosion of privacy. Additionally, the company's reliance on government contracts, particularly with agencies like the CIA and FBI, has led to accusations of being a tool of surveillance and oppression.

What does that mean to you and me? Well, it means you can be targeted negatively, you can be prevented from getting benefits due to you, or even being accused unfairly of something. You are no longer in total control of your life but dependent on a company that you don't even know about or have any relationship with. In other words, you are now a puppet and not an owner of your privacy/information.

Here in Jon Stewart interviewing Carole Cadwallard, who was doing the investigating on the company (as well as others benefiting from DOGE) and found reasons for taking these companies to court (where they were found to be guilty) but in the end, they avoided having to pay and she was the one that ended "paying the price"



This is all about our rights to freedom and to our personal information remaining private to "our choosing" and not to the choosing of others

Oh just wait, it will get better. Soon, you will have the oligarchs here in the US making healthcare decisions (that already happens) that will decide rationing of care and medicines....and ultimately, who gets to live...and who dies.

1:48
 
Oh just wait, it will get better. Soon, you will have the oligarchs here in the US making healthcare decisions (that already happens) that will decide rationing of care and medicines....and ultimately, who gets to live...and who dies.

1:48

That is what happens when Government is in control of healthcare.
 
Due to DOGE, control of our personal data is now held by one company, Palantir!

Palantir is a company that is keying on AI and as such (and with the power of our data now included) has soared in price in the stock market. The stock has triple in price over the past 2 months, from a price of 66.12 to 135.28.

This is certainly great for stock market investors, but what does this control of our personal data and use of AI mean to you and me.

AI Overview

Control of personal data by a single company can pose several risks and potential harms to individuals
.
Here's how:
1. Data Breaches and Identity Theft:
  • Increased Risk: The more personal data a company holds, the more appealing a target it becomes for hackers.
  • Consequences: If sensitive data like names, Social Security numbers, or credit card details are exposed, it can lead to fraud, identity theft, and other harmful consequences.
2. Predatory or Unfair Practices:
  • Targeted Manipulation: Companies can use collected data to create detailed profiles and serve highly personalized, potentially harmful ads, like promoting predatory loans or targeting individuals with health-related vulnerabilities.
  • Price Discrimination: Companies with extensive data may use it to personalize pricing based on individual preferences, potentially leading to unfair or opaque pricing strategies.
  • Biased Outcomes: If data used for creating consumer scores reflects existing biases, it can result in discriminatory outcomes in areas like loan applications or job prospects.
3. Erosion of Privacy and Autonomy:
  • Reduced Anonymity: Comprehensive data collection reduces individual anonymity and can lead to a feeling of being constantly monitored.
  • Loss of Control: Users may be unaware of how their data is being used and sold, leading to a loss of control over their personal information.
  • Invasive Inferences: Data brokers can use seemingly unrelated information to infer sensitive details about individuals, such as health conditions or sexual orientation, which can then be used for targeted manipulation or discriminatory practices.
4. Limited Competition and Innovation:
  • Data Monopolies: When a few companies control vast amounts of data, it becomes difficult for competitors to enter the market or compete effectively, potentially stifling innovation.
  • Suppressed Innovation: Emerging companies may struggle to obtain the data needed to develop new products or services, hindering technological progress.
5. Other Potential Harms:
  • Intellectual Property Threats: Poor data management can lead to the accidental or malicious leaking of sensitive company data, affecting competitiveness.
  • Political Targeting: Data can be used to target individuals with tailored political messages during election campaigns.
  • Law Enforcement Access: Data brokers may sell personal data to government agencies and law enforcement, raising concerns about surveillance and lack of oversight.
In essence, a single company having extensive control over personal data raises concerns about security vulnerabilities, the potential for manipulation, a loss of individual autonomy, and a negative impact on market competition and innovation.

Having said that, Palantir is not a company that has a good and positive reputation:

Why don't people like Palantir?

As an example of the evil nature of Palantir's work, it appears that Palantir has been working with the Israeli military in so-called 'targeted killings'. Reports have suggested such that these murders, probably in the thousands or tens of thousands, utilized social media information and cellphone tracking.

and from AI

AI Overview

Palantir, a data analytics company known for its software used by government agencies, is often criticized for privacy concerns, its reliance on public sector contracts, and its perceived connection to controversial figures and ideologies. Specifically, Palantir's software is used to analyze vast amounts of data, raising concerns about the potential for misuse and the erosion of privacy. Additionally, the company's reliance on government contracts, particularly with agencies like the CIA and FBI, has led to accusations of being a tool of surveillance and oppression.

What does that mean to you and me? Well, it means you can be targeted negatively, you can be prevented from getting benefits due to you, or even being accused unfairly of something. You are no longer in total control of your life but dependent on a company that you don't even know about or have any relationship with. In other words, you are now a puppet and not an owner of your privacy/information.

Here in Jon Stewart interviewing Carole Cadwalladr, who was doing the investigating on the company (as well as others benefiting from DOGE) and found reasons for taking these companies to court (where they were found to be guilty) but in the end, they avoided having to pay and she was the one that ended "paying the price"



This is all about our rights to freedom and to our personal information remaining private to "our choosing" and not to the choosing of others

The US Govt has been doing business with them since 2013 when Obama signed contracts...everyone from the FBI, to DHS, to the NSA have been in bead with them since 2013.
 
Uh....the government isn't in control of healthcare. Corporations are. :)
If it were, it might look a whole lot better.
The Govt certainly is in control of some healthcare, look at the VA....

And look at how dems ran that:


The Obama administration is facing a serious scandal in which government officials are alleged to have falsified data to hide how long veterans were waiting to see doctors at VA hospitals. The controversy has led to calls for the resignation of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki, who has served for five years.
 
Due to DOGE, control of our personal data is now held by one company, Palantir!

Palantir is a company that is keying on AI and as such (and with the power of our data now included) has soared in price in the stock market. The stock has triple in price over the past 2 months, from a price of 66.12 to 135.28.

This is certainly great for stock market investors, but what does this control of our personal data and use of AI mean to you and me.

AI Overview

Control of personal data by a single company can pose several risks and potential harms to individuals
.
Here's how:
1. Data Breaches and Identity Theft:
  • Increased Risk: The more personal data a company holds, the more appealing a target it becomes for hackers.
  • Consequences: If sensitive data like names, Social Security numbers, or credit card details are exposed, it can lead to fraud, identity theft, and other harmful consequences.
2. Predatory or Unfair Practices:
  • Targeted Manipulation: Companies can use collected data to create detailed profiles and serve highly personalized, potentially harmful ads, like promoting predatory loans or targeting individuals with health-related vulnerabilities.
  • Price Discrimination: Companies with extensive data may use it to personalize pricing based on individual preferences, potentially leading to unfair or opaque pricing strategies.
  • Biased Outcomes: If data used for creating consumer scores reflects existing biases, it can result in discriminatory outcomes in areas like loan applications or job prospects.
3. Erosion of Privacy and Autonomy:
  • Reduced Anonymity: Comprehensive data collection reduces individual anonymity and can lead to a feeling of being constantly monitored.
  • Loss of Control: Users may be unaware of how their data is being used and sold, leading to a loss of control over their personal information.
  • Invasive Inferences: Data brokers can use seemingly unrelated information to infer sensitive details about individuals, such as health conditions or sexual orientation, which can then be used for targeted manipulation or discriminatory practices.
4. Limited Competition and Innovation:
  • Data Monopolies: When a few companies control vast amounts of data, it becomes difficult for competitors to enter the market or compete effectively, potentially stifling innovation.
  • Suppressed Innovation: Emerging companies may struggle to obtain the data needed to develop new products or services, hindering technological progress.
5. Other Potential Harms:
  • Intellectual Property Threats: Poor data management can lead to the accidental or malicious leaking of sensitive company data, affecting competitiveness.
  • Political Targeting: Data can be used to target individuals with tailored political messages during election campaigns.
  • Law Enforcement Access: Data brokers may sell personal data to government agencies and law enforcement, raising concerns about surveillance and lack of oversight.
In essence, a single company having extensive control over personal data raises concerns about security vulnerabilities, the potential for manipulation, a loss of individual autonomy, and a negative impact on market competition and innovation.

Having said that, Palantir is not a company that has a good and positive reputation:

Why don't people like Palantir?

As an example of the evil nature of Palantir's work, it appears that Palantir has been working with the Israeli military in so-called 'targeted killings'. Reports have suggested such that these murders, probably in the thousands or tens of thousands, utilized social media information and cellphone tracking.

and from AI

AI Overview

Palantir, a data analytics company known for its software used by government agencies, is often criticized for privacy concerns, its reliance on public sector contracts, and its perceived connection to controversial figures and ideologies. Specifically, Palantir's software is used to analyze vast amounts of data, raising concerns about the potential for misuse and the erosion of privacy. Additionally, the company's reliance on government contracts, particularly with agencies like the CIA and FBI, has led to accusations of being a tool of surveillance and oppression.

What does that mean to you and me? Well, it means you can be targeted negatively, you can be prevented from getting benefits due to you, or even being accused unfairly of something. You are no longer in total control of your life but dependent on a company that you don't even know about or have any relationship with. In other words, you are now a puppet and not an owner of your privacy/information.

Here in Jon Stewart interviewing Carole Cadwalladr, who was doing the investigating on the company (as well as others benefiting from DOGE) and found reasons for taking these companies to court (where they were found to be guilty) but in the end, they avoided having to pay and she was the one that ended "paying the price"



This is all about our rights to freedom and to our personal information remaining private to "our choosing" and not to the choosing of others

Let's talk about all of the bad things that kept happening under President Auto-Pen.

Here's a list with links on WIKI of all of the junk that went on under Biden.

 
No source provided. A YouTube video of a partisan's opinion is worthless.
???

You do KNOW that DOGE opened the door for our personal information to be released to Musk and his employees, don't you?

It is also:

Trump Administration Silently Employs Palantir To Gather Personal Data Of Each American, Raising Privacy, Data Misuse Concerns: Report

The Trump administration has reportedly been discreetly working with Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR) to gather personal data of American citizens from various federal agencies, sparking concerns over privacy and potential misuse of personal data.

What Happened: President Trump’s March executive order for federal data sharing is being implemented through Palantir’s product, Foundry.

In addition, the OP shows AI information given. AI, specifically generative AI, learns information from a variety of sources, including web scraping, public datasets, and internal data sources.
 
That is what happens when Government is in control of healthcare.
Palantir is not the government. It is a private institution with profits as it main goal. In addition, Palantir is into politics as well, meaning they can affect our political world
 
The Govt certainly is in control of some healthcare, look at the VA....

And look at how dems ran that:


The Obama administration is facing a serious scandal in which government officials are alleged to have falsified data to hide how long veterans were waiting to see doctors at VA hospitals. The controversy has led to calls for the resignation of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki, who has served for five years.
Yes...look at the VA and how we ultimately treat our veterans.
And while both parties have had a hand in that, the sorry state of VA healthcare in this country belongs primarily with Republicans.

Oh look, they reversed themselves this time....oh..wait..nevermind.

 
Let's talk about all of the bad things that kept happening under President Auto-Pen.

Here's a list with links on WIKI of all of the junk that went on under Biden.


This doesn't concern you? Or Correll

The Trump administration is collecting data on all Americans

Since then, the administration has been very quiet about these efforts, increasing suspicion. Meanwhile, Palantir has taken more than $113 million in government spending since Trump took office

DOGE should take a look at this. Smells like waste, fraud and abuse.
 
Yes...look at the VA and how we ultimately treat our veterans.
And while both parties have had a hand in that, the sorry state of VA healthcare in this country belongs primarily with Republicans.

Oh look, they reversed themselves this time....oh..wait..nevermind.

Obama was a Dem, not a Republican.



Trump thankfully was elected and signed into legislation major reform:



President Trump Signs VA Health Care Reform Bill





[/URL]
 
Obama was a Dem, not a Republican.



Trump thankfully was elected and signed into legislation major reform:



President Trump Signs VA Health Care Reform Bill





[/URL]
Uh..huh. Flood the zone..flood the zone..flood the zone...

 
Uh....the government isn't in control of healthcare. Corporations are. :)
If it were, it might look a whole lot better.
Right over your head.

The left advocates fore universal healthcare via government.

The worst thing could not happen because they would act just as you described.

Do keep up.
 
This doesn't concern you? Or Correll

The Trump administration is collecting data on all Americans

Since then, the administration has been very quiet about these efforts, increasing suspicion. Meanwhile, Palantir has taken more than $113 million in government spending since Trump took office

DOGE should take a look at this. Smells like waste, fraud and abuse.
Obama and Biden both did this as well as spied on members of congress and the media.

So just save it.
 
This doesn't concern you? Or Correll

The Trump administration is collecting data on all Americans

Since then, the administration has been very quiet about these efforts, increasing suspicion. Meanwhile, Palantir has taken more than $113 million in government spending since Trump took office

DOGE should take a look at this. Smells like waste, fraud and abuse.
Strangely enough, EVERY Administration is collecting data an all Americans.

Yet, it's only bad when Trump and a nonpartisan third party do it.
 
Right over your head.

The left advocates fore universal healthcare via government.

The worst thing could not happen because they would act just as you described.

Do keep up.
I am keeping up. I also know there are many other countries who employ universal healthcare...and who have better healthcare systems than we have here. Which is sad for the leader of the free world. ^Shrug^.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom