'Duck Dynasty' Under Fire Following Star's Incendiary Anti-Gay Remarks

[JoeB131]

He did you f****** idiot thou shall not murder

tapatalk post

Again, where did he specifically say that about fetuses?

Quite the contrary, the bible calls for pregnant women to be killed if they violate God's other laws, therefore the bible did not see the fetus as a person.

God sometimes approves of killing fetuses.

And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. -- Numbers 31:15-17
(Some of the non-virgin women must have been pregnant. They would have been killed along with their unborn fetuses.)

Give them, O LORD: what wilt thou give? give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. -- Hosea 9:14

Yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb. -- Hosea 9:16

Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up. -- Hosea 13:16

The priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell. And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. ...
And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed. -- Numbers 5:21-21, 27-28

Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. -- Genesis 38:24

Listen you sick f*** none of that talked about killing a baby for convenience. Thou shall not murder abortion is murder

tapatalk post

No, those things talked about killing fetuses and women because they were PROPERTY.

You see, that's the thing. The Christian oppossition to contraception used to be "keeping the women in their place as property."

So you killed them if they got knocked up by another guy or if you were trying to steal a neighboring tribes land and wanted to wipe out their seed. Women were property.

And then the ladies stopped putting up with that, and SUDDENLY you guys got all concerned about the "babies".

 

[thanatos144]

Again, where did he specifically say that about fetuses?

Quite the contrary, the bible calls for pregnant women to be killed if they violate God's other laws, therefore the bible did not see the fetus as a person.

God sometimes approves of killing fetuses.

And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. -- Numbers 31:15-17
(Some of the non-virgin women must have been pregnant. They would have been killed along with their unborn fetuses.)

Give them, O LORD: what wilt thou give? give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. -- Hosea 9:14

Yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb. -- Hosea 9:16

Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up. -- Hosea 13:16

The priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell. And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. ...
And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed. -- Numbers 5:21-21, 27-28

Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. -- Genesis 38:24

Listen you sick f*** none of that talked about killing a baby for convenience. Thou shall not murder abortion is murder

tapatalk post

No, those things talked about killing fetuses and women because they were PROPERTY.

You see, that's the thing. The Christian oppossition to contraception used to be "keeping the women in their place as property."

So you killed them if they got knocked up by another guy or if you were trying to steal a neighboring tribes land and wanted to wipe out their seed. Women were property.

And then the ladies stopped putting up with that, and SUDDENLY you guys got all concerned about the "babies".

You are such twisted mother f*****

tapatalk post

 

[JoeB131]

Listen you sick f*** none of that talked about killing a baby for convenience. Thou shall not murder abortion is murder

tapatalk post

No, those things talked about killing fetuses and women because they were PROPERTY.

You see, that's the thing. The Christian oppossition to contraception used to be "keeping the women in their place as property."

So you killed them if they got knocked up by another guy or if you were trying to steal a neighboring tribes land and wanted to wipe out their seed. Women were property.

And then the ladies stopped putting up with that, and SUDDENLY you guys got all concerned about the "babies".

You are such twisted mother f*****

tapatalk post

Yes, I am.

Doesn't take away from my point, though.

The thing is, what you guys want to do is cherry pick from the bible the verses that support your worldview, while ignoring the ones that are just batshit crazy.

We don't kill women anymore for not being virgins on their wedding nights. Most people would consider this a positive development.

 

[GreenBean]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If abortion was "killing babies" then why didn't God SPECIFICALLY prohibit it in the Bible?

I mean the guy had rules for how the Hebrews should cut their hair and what their clothes should look like and how to wash your nutsack after a wet dream, but you would think if protecting the fetus was such an important thing, he'd have spelled that one out.

He did you f****** idiot thou shall not murder

tapatalk post

Again, where did he specifically say that about fetuses?

Quite the contrary, the bible calls for pregnant women to be killed if they violate God's other laws, therefore the bible did not see the fetus as a person.

God sometimes approves of killing fetuses.

And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. -- Numbers 31:15-17
(Some of the non-virgin women must have been pregnant. They would have been killed along with their unborn fetuses.)

Give them, O LORD: what wilt thou give? give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. -- Hosea 9:14

Yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb. -- Hosea 9:16

Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up. -- Hosea 13:16

The priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell. And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. ...
And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed. -- Numbers 5:21-21, 27-28

Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. -- Genesis 38:24

New American Standard Bible
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, And before you were born I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations."Jeremiah 1:5

 

[daws101]

news flash.....Robertson was not FIRED...but put on hiatus (a very short one) he will be returning for the 5th season of DD.
so now you folks who supported him can bullshit yourselves in to thinking you had a hand in it.
the fact is in showbiz money will over ride "morals" every time....

 

[Iceman]

news flash.....Robertson was not FIRED...but put on hiatus (a very short one) he will be returning for the 5th season of DD.
so now you folks who supported him can bullshit yourselves in to thinking you had a hand in it.
the fact is in showbiz money will over ride "morals" every time....

The Gay Lobby and the Professional Left has failed again. I saw this coming, Chick Fil A and the Sochi Olympics were indicators.

 

[daws101]

news flash.....Robertson was not FIRED...but put on hiatus (a very short one) he will be returning for the 5th season of DD.
so now you folks who supported him can bullshit yourselves in to thinking you had a hand in it.
the fact is in showbiz money will over ride "morals" every time....

The Gay Lobby and the Professional Left has failed again. I saw this coming, Chick Fil A and the Sochi Olympics were indicators.

I smell an amazing amount of bullshit all of a sudden...!
wow you have a rich fantasy life.....

 

[Iceman]

news flash.....Robertson was not FIRED...but put on hiatus (a very short one) he will be returning for the 5th season of DD.
so now you folks who supported him can bullshit yourselves in to thinking you had a hand in it.
the fact is in showbiz money will over ride "morals" every time....

The Gay Lobby and the Professional Left has failed again. I saw this coming, Chick Fil A and the Sochi Olympics were indicators.

I smell an amazing amount of bullshit all of a sudden...!
wow you have a rich fantasy life.....

Don't be such a sore loser...

 

[daws101]

The Gay Lobby and the Professional Left has failed again. I saw this coming, Chick Fil A and the Sochi Olympics were indicators.

I smell an amazing amount of bullshit all of a sudden...!
wow you have a rich fantasy life.....

Don't be such a sore loser...

why would your ignorance make me a sore loser?
my guess is you have a giant L tattooed on your forehead...

 

[RKMBrown]

As I pointed out 'normal' and 'natural' are subjective terms: abstract concepts. No one can say definitively what is natura or normal. Social mores tend to dictate these things, culture by culture. Nowadays, the majority of our culture says homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle deserving of respect. That is the current social perspective of the majority of modern day culture in the West and it is spreading throughout the world. Being anti-gay is a minority perspective, at least in the West, nowadays. Accept it. You can think it isn't normal, but it is a perseronal, minority opinion. The rest of the world does not have to see it your way.

What complete bullshit. Normal and natural are not subjective. You liberals always try to twist and spin something to fit your lie. Homosexuals are not normal. Since they are human they are natural but their sexual behavior Is not. Whether it is evil is up to God. Whether it is a sin is up to your bible. My Christian bible days it is but it also says to never hate the sinner just the sin.

tapatalk post

The biological purpose of sexual relations is to reproduce. Homosexuality does not allow for that, and thus is a biological defect, as it hinders the individual person's ability to reproduce and thus continue thier genetic line.

Its up to society to decide if a behavior is allowable or tolerable, but biology says its something screwy.

Not to mention the obvious fact that the bung hole is the place where shit comes out

 

[Iceman]

I smell an amazing amount of bullshit all of a sudden...!
wow you have a rich fantasy life.....

Don't be such a sore loser...

why would your ignorance make me a sore loser?
my guess is you have a giant L tattooed on your forehead...

I find your anger amusing. Why does it enrage you so much Phil Robertson has a TV show? Hell, homosexuals are all over Network and Cable TV. I don't care, and you know what I do? Don't watch. Easy enough.

 

[daws101]

Don't be such a sore loser...

why would your ignorance make me a sore loser?
my guess is you have a giant L tattooed on your forehead...

I find your anger amusing. Why does it enrage you so much Phil Robertson has a TV show? Hell, homosexuals are all over Network and Cable TV. I don't care, and you know what I do? Don't watch. Easy enough.

again an ignorant assumption.....mater of fact I like DD because it's a farce....it's as fake as plastic tits...even more amusing are sanctimonious dumbfucks like you!

 

[daws101]

What complete bullshit. Normal and natural are not subjective. You liberals always try to twist and spin something to fit your lie. Homosexuals are not normal. Since they are human they are natural but their sexual behavior Is not. Whether it is evil is up to God. Whether it is a sin is up to your bible. My Christian bible days it is but it also says to never hate the sinner just the sin.

tapatalk post

The biological purpose of sexual relations is to reproduce. Homosexuality does not allow for that, and thus is a biological defect, as it hinders the individual person's ability to reproduce and thus continue thier genetic line.

Its up to society to decide if a behavior is allowable or tolerable, but biology says its something screwy.

Not to mention the obvious fact that the bung hole is the place where shit comes out

Stephan Cohan's book Masked Men discusses the definition of masculinity in the movies, especially those movies which are so stridently heterosexual that they raise doubt about what is really going on. Cohan argues that the Howard Hawks western Red River is a gay love story between John Wayne and Montgomery Clift. Clift later starred in films like Suddenly Last Summer in which his gay sexuality was actually a thematic element.

If Red River is a gay love story, how about Sands of Iwo Jima? In both of these films, women come on to John Wayne and he pushes them away. In Wayne's personal life he was not the swaggering macho man he presented himself to be. Dominated by his mother as a child, he married dominating women as an adult. He even claimed to be the victim of spousal abuse.

Is is possible that the "chemistry" between openly gay Montgomery Clift and macho man John Wayne reflects post-war ambivalence about alternative sexuality? Red River ends with an embrace between John Wayne and Montgomery Clift, while Joanne Dru, the female whom they have both spurned, scolds them. This is a departure from the book the film is based on. In the book, Clift gets the girl when Wayne dies. In the movie, the boys get each other.

 

[Iceman]

why would your ignorance make me a sore loser?
my guess is you have a giant L tattooed on your forehead...

I find your anger amusing. Why does it enrage you so much Phil Robertson has a TV show? Hell, homosexuals are all over Network and Cable TV. I don't care, and you know what I do? Don't watch. Easy enough.

again an ignorant assumption.....mater of fact I like DD because it's a farce....it's as fake as plastic tits...even more amusing are sanctimonious dumbfucks like you!

What is ignorant? That you are angry? No, that is evident by your posts.

 

[daws101]

I find your anger amusing. Why does it enrage you so much Phil Robertson has a TV show? Hell, homosexuals are all over Network and Cable TV. I don't care, and you know what I do? Don't watch. Easy enough.

again an ignorant assumption.....mater of fact I like DD because it's a farce....it's as fake as plastic tits...even more amusing are sanctimonious dumbfucks like you!

What is ignorant? That you are angry? No, that is evident by your posts.

obviously you are....

 

[Iceman]

again an ignorant assumption.....mater of fact I like DD because it's a farce....it's as fake as plastic tits...even more amusing are sanctimonious dumbfucks like you!

What is ignorant? That you are angry? No, that is evident by your posts.

obviously you are....

About what? Why would I be mad Phil Robertson is getting his show back? I don't even watch it.

The only thing I get amusement out of is the Gay Lobby failing, again.

 

[RKMBrown]

The biological purpose of sexual relations is to reproduce. Homosexuality does not allow for that, and thus is a biological defect, as it hinders the individual person's ability to reproduce and thus continue thier genetic line.

Its up to society to decide if a behavior is allowable or tolerable, but biology says its something screwy.

Not to mention the obvious fact that the bung hole is the place where shit comes out

Stephan Cohan's book Masked Men discusses the definition of masculinity in the movies, especially those movies which are so stridently heterosexual that they raise doubt about what is really going on. Cohan argues that the Howard Hawks western Red River is a gay love story between John Wayne and Montgomery Clift. Clift later starred in films like Suddenly Last Summer in which his gay sexuality was actually a thematic element.

If Red River is a gay love story, how about Sands of Iwo Jima? In both of these films, women come on to John Wayne and he pushes them away. In Wayne's personal life he was not the swaggering macho man he presented himself to be. Dominated by his mother as a child, he married dominating women as an adult. He even claimed to be the victim of spousal abuse.

Is is possible that the "chemistry" between openly gay Montgomery Clift and macho man John Wayne reflects post-war ambivalence about alternative sexuality? Red River ends with an embrace between John Wayne and Montgomery Clift, while Joanne Dru, the female whom they have both spurned, scolds them. This is a departure from the book the film is based on. In the book, Clift gets the girl when Wayne dies. In the movie, the boys get each other.

Clift is playing the adopted son in that movie you freaking retard.

 

[daws101]

What is ignorant? That you are angry? No, that is evident by your posts.

obviously you are....

About what? Why would I be mad Phil Robertson is getting his show back? I don't even watch it.

The only thing I get amusement out of is the Gay Lobby failing, again.

the gay lobby did not fail.....you not understanding how the entertainment business works just proves my point...the gay lobby had no more to do with the out come then Robertson's fans..

 

[daws101]

Not to mention the obvious fact that the bung hole is the place where shit comes out

Stephan Cohan's book Masked Men discusses the definition of masculinity in the movies, especially those movies which are so stridently heterosexual that they raise doubt about what is really going on. Cohan argues that the Howard Hawks western Red River is a gay love story between John Wayne and Montgomery Clift. Clift later starred in films like Suddenly Last Summer in which his gay sexuality was actually a thematic element.

If Red River is a gay love story, how about Sands of Iwo Jima? In both of these films, women come on to John Wayne and he pushes them away. In Wayne's personal life he was not the swaggering macho man he presented himself to be. Dominated by his mother as a child, he married dominating women as an adult. He even claimed to be the victim of spousal abuse.

Is is possible that the "chemistry" between openly gay Montgomery Clift and macho man John Wayne reflects post-war ambivalence about alternative sexuality? Red River ends with an embrace between John Wayne and Montgomery Clift, while Joanne Dru, the female whom they have both spurned, scolds them. This is a departure from the book the film is based on. In the book, Clift gets the girl when Wayne dies. In the movie, the boys get each other.

Clift is playing the adopted son in that movie you freaking retard.

really? not like I haven't seen the film numerous times....playing is the operative word.