Drudge Flashing Siren Is Up: DNC Sues Trump, Wikileaks, And Russia Over Loss Of 2016 Election

[Sunsettommy]

The Last Refuge

DNC Files Frivolous Campaign Lawsuit, Trump Campaign Responds: We Look Forward To Discovery…

Posted on April 20, 2018 by sundance

Excerpt:

"In a pathetic attempt to keep pushing the vast Russian conspiracy narrative; and trying to get out in front of growing evidence that former Obama administration, government officials, DNC and weaponized government conspired to assist Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential bid; the DNC has filed a lawsuit against the Trump campaign accusing their opposition of what they are transparently guilty of."

In the link is a specific response from the Trump Team.

It seems the Democrats have made camp in the Twilight Zone.....................

 

[Sunsettommy]

First they have to establish that a possible crime was committed.

I'd think the evidence is overwhelming

I have read the few indictments, none that connects to President Trump.

This civil law suit is about collusion with Russia to interfere into the election. Richard Nixon did not "order the break in of the DNC Watergate complex"--or at least no one ever accused him of that--or proved that. Nixon's problem was OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Trump went on National T.V. and admitted to Obstruction of Justice.



For the collusion part scroll back to post # 377 on this thread.

Man you are trying hard to create something that doesn't exist as this National Review article points out:

Why Trump Fired Comey

By Andrew C. McCarthy
June 10, 2017

EXCERPT:

"At last, at least for your humble correspondent, this week’s big hearing brought clarity. I now believe President Donald Trump fired Federal Bureau of Investigation director James Comey because he believes Comey intentionally misled the public into believing Trump was under investigation by the FBI. There is enough support for this theory that, had the president been forthright in explaining it when he dismissed Comey on May 9, there might have been considerably less uproar. Instead, Trump dissembled, as he seems hardwired to do. He thus bought himself a debilitating special-counsel investigation, despite its being increasingly patent that there is no crime to investigate.

March 20 was the big day. Understanding why requires us to go back several weeks, to January 6, the day Trump and Comey first met.

It was also the day the FBI, in conjunction with the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency, issued a report called “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections.” The report was based on intelligence that had been gathered over several months. But it made clear to the public that the FBI was continuing to investigate. As the agencies put it, “new information continues to emerge, providing increased insight into Russian activities.” Thereafter, the continuing investigation was widely covered in the media, often on the strength of unlawful leaks of classified information.

The agencies’ report was the reason for Trump’s introduction to Comey that day, at Trump Tower in New York City. The Bureau’s then-director, accompanied by other intelligence-agency bosses, was there to brief the then-president-elect.

In written testimony that Comey submitted this week to the Senate Intelligence Committee, he recounts his concern that the incoming president might form the misimpression that “the FBI was conducting a counter-intelligence investigation of his personal conduct.” Thus, after discussing the matter with his FBI “leadership team,” Comey came to the meeting “prepared to assure President-Elect Trump that we were not investigating him personally.” He met one-on-one with Trump to deliver part of the briefing. Though the president-elect did not ask, Comey volunteered the “assurance” that Trump was not being investigated."

LINK

Comey LIED to the President, and made SMEARING statements against him!

How could you not see that?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I think this lawsuit just illustrates that democrats believe their own lies

especially when its pretty obvious a CLINTON orchestrated it.LOL

is that the trumptard delusion of the day?
wackjob

Yeah, it was Nation of Islam Cleric Keith Ellison who was behind it.

BUT I get why you're such a Nation of Islam Fan, fakelawyer.

 

[oreo]

The DNC sued Richard Nixon over Watergate. The suit was for 1 million dollars for breaking in and trying to bug the DNC headquarters at Watergate. Low & behold several years later Richard Nixon ended up paying the DNC $775,000 in a settlement over that.

Now the difference in a civil trial versus a criminal trial. A criminal trial requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas in a civil trial only "preponderance of evidence is needed."

Where this originally played out Nationally was in the O.J. Simpson trial where he was found not guilty--BUT then went onto a civil trial and LOST the law suit over preponderence of evidence. The other thing is---depositions, evidence & testimony will be made public in a civil trial.

This is not good for Trump.

Add to this that the congressional open public hearings on this will begin this coming January 20, 2019 when Democrats when are sworn in as majority leaders in one or both houses of congress--and we should have some great entertainment all the way up until impeachment.

A great book to prepare for all this

Top seller on Amazon, well written, informative, hard to put down.

First they have to establish that a possible crime was committed.

There's blood all over the place in the Trump investigation. I am fairly certain that the DNC has a lot of evidence that could meet the qualifications of "preponderence of evidence" that those within the Trump campaign did indeed collude with Russians to interfere into the election.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations since 2015.

"GCHQ--first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said."
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia

Shep Smith states in this video that Trump surrogates were on the phone with Russian intelligence agents the day they hacked into DNC databases.


Trump Jr. secret Russian meeting at the Trump tower in June 2016.


Evidence of collusion comes out all the time, in fact almost on a daily basis anymore.
Rick Gates

Prosecutors explained that van der Zwaan had lied and withheld documents about information that was “pertinent” to their investigation —that Rick Gates had been in direct contact during the presidential campaign with a person who “has ties to a Russian intelligence service and had such ties in 2016.They said that when van der Zwaan was interviewed by the FBI in November, he told investigators that Rick Gates had informed him that Person A was a former officer of the Russian military intelligence service, known as the GRU. (Russian intelligence.)

Manafort associate had Russian intelligence ties during 2016 campaign, prosecutors say

Carter Page:

On November 2, 2017, Page testified[39] to the House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016.[40][41][42] Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[43]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[44] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[40][43][45][46] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.[47]

Carter Page - Wikipedia

Roger Stone:

In the final months of the 2016 campaign, longtime Donald Trump associate Roger Stone repeatedly discussed his backchannel communications with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and claimed knowledge of forthcoming leaks from the group, a CNN KFile review of his public statements shows Stone's comments about WikiLeaks have come under increased scrutiny as the FBI and congressional committees investigate whether Trump associates were involved in Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

Trump adviser Roger Stone repeatedly claimed to know of forthcoming WikiLeaks dumps - CNNPolitics

Papalopodous has already pleaded guilty. Now Cohen looks to have actually been in Prague.
Special Counsel Has Evidence Michael Cohen Travelled to Prague-McClatchy

Mueller is moving so fast it's hard to keep up with. But to-date there are 5 guilty plea's and another 90+ Federal Grand Jury indictments & criminal charges, that are certain to produce more.

If you haven't been paying attention this is the book for you. It will get you somewhat up to date as to what has happened over the last year.

Top seller on Amazon, very well written, reads like a spy novel, and follows the news reporting over the last year in a time line & puts it all together.

Damn, you sig fits this post to a tea. I guess you can't be accused of not practicing what you preach. Exactly what did Papalopodous plead guilty to?


.

You mean you can't look up what Papalopodous pleaded guilty to yourself? You don't know that Rick Gates has pleaded guilty on 2 counts--and they are BOTH working with Mueller in plea deals.

The point IS--there is enough preponderence of evidence here for the DNC to take Donald Trump to court & win a civil suit right now.

There's blood all over the place in the Trump investigation. I am fairly certain that the DNC has a lot of evidence that could meet the qualifications of "preponderence of evidence" that those within the Trump campaign did indeed collude with Russians to interfere into the election.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations since 2015.

"GCHQ--first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said."
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia

Shep Smith states in this video that Trump surrogates were on the phone with Russian intelligence agents the day they hacked into DNC databases.


Trump Jr. secret Russian meeting at the Trump tower in June 2016.


Evidence of collusion comes out all the time, in fact almost on a daily basis anymore.
Rick Gates
Manafort associate had Russian intelligence ties during 2016 campaign, prosecutors say

Carter Page:
[39] to the House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016.[40][41][42] Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[43]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[44] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[40][43][45][46] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.[47]
Carter Page - Wikipedia

Roger Stone:
Trump adviser Roger Stone repeatedly claimed to know of forthcoming WikiLeaks dumps - CNNPolitics

Papalopodous has already pleaded guilty. Now Cohen looks to have actually been in Prague.
Special Counsel Has Evidence Michael Cohen Travelled to Prague-McClatchy

Mueller is moving so fast it's hard to keep up with. But to-date there are 5 guilty plea's and another 90+ Federal Grand Jury indictments & criminal charges, that are certain to produce more.

If you haven't been paying attention this is the book for you. It will get you somewhat up to date as to what has happened over the last year.

Top seller on Amazon, very well written, reads like a spy novel, and follows the news reporting over the last year in a time line & puts it all together.

Never disputed the charges against them, but so far NONE of it pertains to the Russia/campaign connection.

Mueller recently stated that he is NOT pursuing a criminal investigation of the President, this after 11 months! If he had the stuff as YOU think he does, why does he back off on the President himself?

From the Washington Post

April

by Carol D. Leonnig and Robert Costa

Excerpt:

"Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III informed President Trump’s attorneys last month that he is continuing to investigate the president but does not consider him a criminal target at this point, according to three people familiar with the discussions.

In private negotiations in early March about a possible presidential interview, Mueller described Trump as a subject of his investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. Prosecutors view someone as a subject when that person has engaged in conduct that is under investigation but there is not sufficient evidence to bring charges."

LINK

Robert Mueller has not convened a Federal Grand Jury--& accumulated 5 guilty plea's & 90+ other criminal charges over jay-walking-- A lot of these specific charges we still don't know exactly what they are--as they are sealed by the court.

Post # 377 on this thread explains it. Most certainly the DNC has enough "Preponderance of evidence" of collusion to sue the Trump campaign in court and win.

 

[oreo]

The DNC sued Richard Nixon over Watergate. The suit was for 1 million dollars for breaking in and trying to bug the DNC headquarters at Watergate. Low & behold several years later Richard Nixon ended up paying the DNC $775,000 in a settlement over that.

Now the difference in a civil trial versus a criminal trial. A criminal trial requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas in a civil trial only "preponderance of evidence is needed."

Where this originally played out Nationally was in the O.J. Simpson trial where he was found not guilty--BUT then went onto a civil trial and LOST the law suit over preponderence of evidence. The other thing is---depositions, evidence & testimony will be made public in a civil trial.

This is not good for Trump.

Add to this that the congressional open public hearings on this will begin this coming January 20, 2019 when Democrats when are sworn in as majority leaders in one or both houses of congress--and we should have some great entertainment all the way up until impeachment.

A great book to prepare for all this

Top seller on Amazon, well written, informative, hard to put down.

First they have to establish that a possible crime was committed.

There's blood all over the place in the Trump investigation. I am fairly certain that the DNC has a lot of evidence that could meet the qualifications of "preponderence of evidence" that those within the Trump campaign did indeed collude with Russians to interfere into the election.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations since 2015.

"GCHQ--first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said."
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia

Shep Smith states in this video that Trump surrogates were on the phone with Russian intelligence agents the day they hacked into DNC databases.


Trump Jr. secret Russian meeting at the Trump tower in June 2016.


Evidence of collusion comes out all the time, in fact almost on a daily basis anymore.
Rick Gates

Prosecutors explained that van der Zwaan had lied and withheld documents about information that was “pertinent” to their investigation —that Rick Gates had been in direct contact during the presidential campaign with a person who “has ties to a Russian intelligence service and had such ties in 2016.They said that when van der Zwaan was interviewed by the FBI in November, he told investigators that Rick Gates had informed him that Person A was a former officer of the Russian military intelligence service, known as the GRU. (Russian intelligence.)

Manafort associate had Russian intelligence ties during 2016 campaign, prosecutors say

Carter Page:

On November 2, 2017, Page testified[39] to the House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016.[40][41][42] Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[43]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[44] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[40][43][45][46] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.[47]

Carter Page - Wikipedia

Roger Stone:

In the final months of the 2016 campaign, longtime Donald Trump associate Roger Stone repeatedly discussed his backchannel communications with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and claimed knowledge of forthcoming leaks from the group, a CNN KFile review of his public statements shows Stone's comments about WikiLeaks have come under increased scrutiny as the FBI and congressional committees investigate whether Trump associates were involved in Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

Trump adviser Roger Stone repeatedly claimed to know of forthcoming WikiLeaks dumps - CNNPolitics

Papalopodous has already pleaded guilty. Now Cohen looks to have actually been in Prague.
Special Counsel Has Evidence Michael Cohen Travelled to Prague-McClatchy

Mueller is moving so fast it's hard to keep up with. But to-date there are 5 guilty plea's and another 90+ Federal Grand Jury indictments & criminal charges, that are certain to produce more.

If you haven't been paying attention this is the book for you. It will get you somewhat up to date as to what has happened over the last year.

Top seller on Amazon, very well written, reads like a spy novel, and follows the news reporting over the last year in a time line & puts it all together.

Damn, you sig fits this post to a tea. I guess you can't be accused of not practicing what you preach. Exactly what did Papalopodous plead guilty to?


.

You mean you can't look up what Papalopodous pleaded guilty to yourself? You don't know that Rick Gates has pleaded guilty on 2 counts--and they are BOTH working with Mueller in plea deals.

The point IS--there is enough preponderence of evidence here for the DNC to take Donald Trump to court & win a civil suit right now.

There's blood all over the place in the Trump investigation. I am fairly certain that the DNC has a lot of evidence that could meet the qualifications of "preponderence of evidence" that those within the Trump campaign did indeed collude with Russians to interfere into the election.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations since 2015.

"GCHQ--first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said."
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia

Shep Smith states in this video that Trump surrogates were on the phone with Russian intelligence agents the day they hacked into DNC databases.


Trump Jr. secret Russian meeting at the Trump tower in June 2016.


Evidence of collusion comes out all the time, in fact almost on a daily basis anymore.
Rick Gates
Manafort associate had Russian intelligence ties during 2016 campaign, prosecutors say

Carter Page:
[39] to the House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016.[40][41][42] Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[43]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[44] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[40][43][45][46] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.[47]
Carter Page - Wikipedia

Roger Stone:
Trump adviser Roger Stone repeatedly claimed to know of forthcoming WikiLeaks dumps - CNNPolitics

Papalopodous has already pleaded guilty. Now Cohen looks to have actually been in Prague.
Special Counsel Has Evidence Michael Cohen Travelled to Prague-McClatchy

Mueller is moving so fast it's hard to keep up with. But to-date there are 5 guilty plea's and another 90+ Federal Grand Jury indictments & criminal charges, that are certain to produce more.

If you haven't been paying attention this is the book for you. It will get you somewhat up to date as to what has happened over the last year.

Top seller on Amazon, very well written, reads like a spy novel, and follows the news reporting over the last year in a time line & puts it all together.

The second Mueller charges Cater Page with picking his nose in public by all means let us know.
When Mueller 'brought the hammer down' on the Dutch lawyer the writing was on the wall for Trump.......right?
The lawyer ended up in a luxury prison for THIRTY DAYS!!!!!!
The coffee boy is going to get thirty days. Flynn is going to have his case thrown out b/c Struck 'breathed' on the charging documents.
Please put up the link showing where 'collusion' is a federal offence.
You're an idiot!
Wait until the second SC is charged with uncovering 'everything Clinton'.
The ***** will spend the rest of her useless empty loser life trying to stay out of prison.
Don't forget to change hands once in a while asshole. You might put your back out.
After the Inspector General recommends McCabe and Comey and a couple of dozen others be charged and sent to prison you'll be here bleating about how Trump must have 'got to' the IG.
Face it pal. You're once again on the losing side.

You might want to go back to post # 377 and read about Carter Page.

You'll note that a lot of members in the Trump circle will repeatedly DENY, DENY, DENY on the Sean Hannity show--and then when they are under direct sworn testimony their account suddenly changes.

In fact Carter Page was under FBI investigation for working with the Russians back in 2013.
Russian Spies Tried to Recruit Carter Page Before He Advised Trump

 

[Sunsettommy]

Gee Oreo, why did you ignore what Meuller said about Trump at post 378 ?

Why did you ignore what I STATED at post 378, which I quote:

"Never disputed the charges against them, but so far NONE of it pertains to the Russia/campaign connection."

You have a hard time with this in your silly zeal to convict someone who has NEVER been charged, That Comey stated to Trumps face several times and told Congress that he was NOT under investigation and that Diane Feinstein stated she see no connection between Trump and the probably bogus Russia/Campaign either.

This is likely why Trump after 11 months of investigation of a simple claim has not been charged.

 

[postman]

Robert Mueller has not convened a Federal Grand Jury--& accumulated 5 guilty plea's & 90+ other criminal charges over jay-walking-- A lot of these specific charges we still don't know exactly what they are--as they are sealed by the court.

Post # 377 on this thread explains it. Most certainly the DNC has enough "Preponderance of evidence" of collusion to sue the Trump campaign in court and win.

If only these people would go to the DOJ or other website, and look at the indictments, statements of charges, and plea agreements. When Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, it wasn't simply that he lied, they give exactly what he lied about, such as talking to Kislyiak in January 2017, when he claimed he didn't. And of talking about sanctions to Kislyiak, when he claimed he didn't.

So Flynn wasn't just guilty of lying, he was guilty of talking to the Russian ambassador about the Obama sanctions against Russia.

Papadapolous pleaded guilty to lying about when he met up with the Russia linked professor and the woman refered to as "Putin's niece", and especially how he was a member of the Trump national security team when he found out about the stolen Hillary e-mails. And how he transmitted the offer to the Trump campaign officials.

 

[WEATHER53]

The ultimate cheating sore losers wailfest is all that this baloney is.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Robert Mueller has not convened a Federal Grand Jury--& accumulated 5 guilty plea's & 90+ other criminal charges over jay-walking-- A lot of these specific charges we still don't know exactly what they are--as they are sealed by the court.

Post # 377 on this thread explains it. Most certainly the DNC has enough "Preponderance of evidence" of collusion to sue the Trump campaign in court and win.

If only these people would go to the DOJ or other website, and look at the indictments, statements of charges, and plea agreements. When Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, it wasn't simply that he lied, they give exactly what he lied about, such as talking to Kislyiak in January 2017, when he claimed he didn't. And of talking about sanctions to Kislyiak, when he claimed he didn't.

So Flynn wasn't just guilty of lying, he was guilty of talking to the Russian ambassador about the Obama sanctions against Russia.

Papadapolous pleaded guilty to lying about when he met up with the Russia linked professor and the woman refered to as "Putin's niece", and especially how he was a member of the Trump national security team when he found out about the stolen Hillary e-mails. And how he transmitted the offer to the Trump campaign officials.

Yawn,,,,,, still nothing to show that Trump is complicit.

Flynn has been out of the White House since February 13. 2017.

 

[oreo]

Robert Mueller has not convened a Federal Grand Jury--& accumulated 5 guilty plea's & 90+ other criminal charges over jay-walking-- A lot of these specific charges we still don't know exactly what they are--as they are sealed by the court.

Post # 377 on this thread explains it. Most certainly the DNC has enough "Preponderance of evidence" of collusion to sue the Trump campaign in court and win.

If only these people would go to the DOJ or other website, and look at the indictments, statements of charges, and plea agreements. When Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, it wasn't simply that he lied, they give exactly what he lied about, such as talking to Kislyiak in January 2017, when he claimed he didn't. And of talking about sanctions to Kislyiak, when he claimed he didn't.

So Flynn wasn't just guilty of lying, he was guilty of talking to the Russian ambassador about the Obama sanctions against Russia.

Papadapolous pleaded guilty to lying about when he met up with the Russia linked professor and the woman refered to as "Putin's niece", and especially how he was a member of the Trump national security team when he found out about the stolen Hillary e-mails. And how he transmitted the offer to the Trump campaign officials.

Yawn,,,,,, still nothing to show that Trump is complicit.

Flynn has been out of the White House since February 13. 2017.

Michael Flynn has pleaded GUILTY & is working with Robert Mueller. Trump may not be complicit in the Russian hacking of DNC databases, (albeit I think they will prove that he knew about it eventually) but he is most certainly under investigation for OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. Just like Richard Nixon. Here again is Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V.

I don't give a rats ass if Michael Flynn is no longer in the White House, we are talking about what HAPPENED DURING the campaign. That's what this is all about.

One of my favorite video's of all time.



For those of you that don't know what is going on scroll back to post # 377 on this thread. Living in your right wing media bubble of the DRUGE REPORT, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh & all of the others is not working for you.

You either can choose to stay up in the last row in the nose bleed section of no or completely distorted information on FOXNEWS or get in front of it by leaving your bubble. Because just like with Nixon, there will be OPEN--PUBLIC congressional hearings on this and at that point NO ONE will be able to protect Trump. They will begin on January 20, 2019 when Democrats are sworn in as majority leaders in one or both houses of congress. There is a blue Tsunami coming this November to a Republican seat near you.

 

[asaratis]

It will be hilarious when the DNC has to turn over everything they have on their computers to Trump's campaign lawyers during 'discovery'.
Dear GOD the DEMs are so ******* stupid it's stunning to watch.
Maybe the DNC will take a sledgehammer to the computers, like Hillary did.

You hve no clue how discovery owrks do you? It's limited to matters germane to the charges in the case. And unless the contents of the server are exculpatory to the conspiracy, it's non discoverable.

So what is the argument that the server will prove they didn't conspire with the russians?

LOL

Moron...

They want damages for the server hack, that they can not show happened. Every single thing those idiots want from the Republicans can be sought for from the dim wits.. The discovery door swings both ways dumb ass..

They’re not asking for damages for the server hack, per se. They’re asking for damages for the conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign, to undermine the Clinton campaign. And for publishing the emails they stole from the server. The negative publicity surrounding the publication of the emails reduced donations as people were afraid their personal information would fall into nefarious hands.

The reduced donations are easy to prove. Money received before the hack. Money received after. That’s can be proven without access to the server.

The FBI went to Hillary's campaign manager and REPEATEDLY warned him that their DNC computers were VERY suseptical to Russian hacking.
Robby Mook told the FBI to **** off.
Then when the Russians/Israelis/Germans and TWO NATIVE KIDS in N. Canada using a burnt out 286 were able to hack Podesta' computer the DNC REFUSED!!!!!!! to allow the FBI to help them tighten up their security.
Blame the *** Robby Mook etc etc!

Podesta gave his password to phishers. They didn't have to hack him.

 

[dannyboys]

It will be hilarious when the DNC has to turn over everything they have on their computers to Trump's campaign lawyers during 'discovery'.
Dear GOD the DEMs are so ******* stupid it's stunning to watch.
Maybe the DNC will take a sledgehammer to the computers, like Hillary did.

You hve no clue how discovery owrks do you? It's limited to matters germane to the charges in the case. And unless the contents of the server are exculpatory to the conspiracy, it's non discoverable.

So what is the argument that the server will prove they didn't conspire with the russians?

LOL

Moron...

They want damages for the server hack, that they can not show happened. Every single thing those idiots want from the Republicans can be sought for from the dim wits.. The discovery door swings both ways dumb ass..

They’re not asking for damages for the server hack, per se. They’re asking for damages for the conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign, to undermine the Clinton campaign. And for publishing the emails they stole from the server. The negative publicity surrounding the publication of the emails reduced donations as people were afraid their personal information would fall into nefarious hands.

The reduced donations are easy to prove. Money received before the hack. Money received after. That’s can be proven without access to the server.

The FBI went to Hillary's campaign manager and REPEATEDLY warned him that their DNC computers were VERY suseptical to Russian hacking.
Robby Mook told the FBI to **** off.
Then when the Russians/Israelis/Germans and TWO NATIVE KIDS in N. Canada using a burnt out 286 were able to hack Podesta' computer the DNC REFUSED!!!!!!! to allow the FBI to help them tighten up their security.
Blame the *** Robby Mook etc etc!

Podesta gave his password to phishers. They didn't have to hack him.

That's right.......in Podesta's case.
Imagine if Hillary had won the Podesta brothers would be in Hillary's cabinet today.
And Iran and NK would be lining up to get another bunch of ransom/blackmail money.
How ******* stupid does someone have to be to have as their password 'password'?!!!!!!!!
A more corrupt two men have never been born.

 

[Billy_Bob]

It will be hilarious when the DNC has to turn over everything they have on their computers to Trump's campaign lawyers during 'discovery'.
Dear GOD the DEMs are so ******* stupid it's stunning to watch.
Maybe the DNC will take a sledgehammer to the computers, like Hillary did.

You hve no clue how discovery owrks do you? It's limited to matters germane to the charges in the case. And unless the contents of the server are exculpatory to the conspiracy, it's non discoverable.

So what is the argument that the server will prove they didn't conspire with the russians?

LOL

Moron...

They want damages for the server hack, that they can not show happened. Every single thing those idiots want from the Republicans can be sought for from the dim wits.. The discovery door swings both ways dumb ass..

They’re not asking for damages for the server hack, per se. They’re asking for damages for the conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign, to undermine the Clinton campaign. And for publishing the emails they stole from the server. The negative publicity surrounding the publication of the emails reduced donations as people were afraid their personal information would fall into nefarious hands.

The reduced donations are easy to prove. Money received before the hack. Money received after. That’s can be proven without access to the server.

The FBI went to Hillary's campaign manager and REPEATEDLY warned him that their DNC computers were VERY suseptical to Russian hacking.
Robby Mook told the FBI to **** off.
Then when the Russians/Israelis/Germans and TWO NATIVE KIDS in N. Canada using a burnt out 286 were able to hack Podesta' computer the DNC REFUSED!!!!!!! to allow the FBI to help them tighten up their security.
Blame the *** Robby Mook etc etc!

Podesta gave his password to phishers. They didn't have to hack him.

'Podesta gave his password to phishers. '


Funny how that simple fact is ignored..

 

[Billy_Bob]

They’re asking for damages for the conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign, to undermine the Clinton campaign.

Where is your evidence of this? Mueller's been looking now for 16 months and hasn't found any, you have proof?

 

[deanrd]

Democrats sued Nixon and won on the day he resigned.

The Republicans were forced to pay $750,000.00 and I wonder how many millions that would be in today's dollars?

 

[asaratis]

Democrats sued Nixon and won on the day he resigned.

The Republicans were forced to pay $750,000.00 and I wonder how many millions that would be in today's dollars?

How many billions do you think Hillary and the DNC will have to pay?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Democrats sued Nixon and won on the day he resigned.

The Republicans were forced to pay $750,000.00 and I wonder how many millions that would be in today's dollars?

Having wet dreams are you? You do realize you have no proof and unlike Nixon there inst any to be had except for the ones in your dreams...

 

[Billy_Bob]

Democrats sued Nixon and won on the day he resigned.

The Republicans were forced to pay $750,000.00 and I wonder how many millions that would be in today's dollars?

How many billions do you think Hillary and the DNC will have to pay?

that's the one thing I like about Trump... He will counter sue these left wing retards for defamation..

 

[WEATHER53]

Robert Mueller has not convened a Federal Grand Jury--& accumulated 5 guilty plea's & 90+ other criminal charges over jay-walking-- A lot of these specific charges we still don't know exactly what they are--as they are sealed by the court.

Post # 377 on this thread explains it. Most certainly the DNC has enough "Preponderance of evidence" of collusion to sue the Trump campaign in court and win.

If only these people would go to the DOJ or other website, and look at the indictments, statements of charges, and plea agreements. When Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, it wasn't simply that he lied, they give exactly what he lied about, such as talking to Kislyiak in January 2017, when he claimed he didn't. And of talking about sanctions to Kislyiak, when he claimed he didn't.

So Flynn wasn't just guilty of lying, he was guilty of talking to the Russian ambassador about the Obama sanctions against Russia.

Papadapolous pleaded guilty to lying about when he met up with the Russia linked professor and the woman refered to as "Putin's niece", and especially how he was a member of the Trump national security team when he found out about the stolen Hillary e-mails. And how he transmitted the offer to the Trump campaign officials.

Yawn,,,,,, still nothing to show that Trump is complicit.

Flynn has been out of the White House since February 13. 2017.

Michael Flynn has pleaded GUILTY & is working with Robert Mueller. Trump may not be complicit in the Russian hacking of DNC databases, (albeit I think they will prove that he knew about it eventually) but he is most certainly under investigation for OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. Just like Richard Nixon. Here again is Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V.

I don't give a rats ass if Michael Flynn is no longer in the White House, we are talking about what HAPPENED DURING the campaign. That's what this is all about.

One of my favorite video's of all time.



For those of you that don't know what is going on scroll back to post # 377 on this thread. Living in your right wing media bubble of the DRUGE REPORT, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh & all of the others is not working for you.

You either can choose to stay up in the last row in the nose bleed section of no or completely distorted information on FOXNEWS or get in front of it by leaving your bubble. Because just like with Nixon, there will be OPEN--PUBLIC congressional hearings on this and at that point NO ONE will be able to protect Trump. They will begin on January 20, 2019 when Democrats are sworn in as majority leaders in one or both houses of congress. There is a blue Tsunami coming this November to a Republican seat near you.

Please stop posting this preset fake news over and over

 

[Billy_Bob]

The other thing Trump will do is demand that the looser pays all legal and court costs... That will be a chunk of change..