Drinking and posting?

[JBeukema]

Should users abstain from posting while consuming large quantities of alcohol?

 

[Agnapostate]

I know which way David votes on this one. He's hoping that one of the objects of his obsession loses inhibitions through excessive alcohol consumption...

 

[JBeukema]

What's sad is that i keep coprrecting people and pointing put logiical fallacies.. while drunk..

wtf?!

if you're being refuted by someone weho's intoxxicated, what does that say about your intial argument?

oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism

 

[JBeukema]

Screw spellchec kl,. let's see if people can tell what I'[msaying while drunk without it

 

[Agnapostate]

oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism

I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.

 

[Toro]

No, God no!

I'd never post...

 

[JBeukema]

oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism

I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.

How so?

true (pure, unadulterated) anarchy rejects any governmental system as inherently hierarchal, tyrannical, and requiring the loss of liberty

What you have describes is a more recent neo-anarchic philosophy. whuich ultimately calls for a system based on social contract, demoncracy, and confederacy. democracy and confederacy are governmental forms, and therefore mutally exclusiove with 'true' (dare I say 'classical') anarchy

One has no protections under calssical anrchy ()read: the natural state'), which is why social contracts have given rose to a nmber of governmental systems which the people hopwe will protect their 'rights' or interests

 

[Oddball]

 

[JBeukema]

*save*

 

[AllieBaba]

Drunken fools.

 

[JBeukema]

Agna, if you thin I'm so off base, then refue my points, show my claims assertions to be false, destory my presmise, and force to me to aknowledge that I am wrong

otherwise, it shall be read s a forfeit by someone who cannot refue what JB has said

The challenge has been made

 

[Oddball]

oh, and Agana- I'm waiting for your reply on that thing we were having regarding anarchy andf anarcho-socialism

I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.

How so?

true (pure, unadulterated) anarchy rejects any governmental system as inherently hierarchal, tyrannical, and requiring the loss of liberty

What you have describes is a more recent neo-anarchic philosophy. whuich ultimately calls for a system based on social contract, demoncracy, and confederacy. democracy and confederacy are governmental forms, and therefore mutally exclusiove with 'true' (dare I say 'classical') anarchy

One has no protections under calssical anrchy ()read: the natural state'), which is why social contracts have given rose to a nmber of governmental systems which the people hopwe will protect their 'rights' or interests

You mean it isn't yet glaringly evident to you that he's just makes this shit up as he goes along??

 

[JBeukema]

Drunken fools.

hey... only one of we fools is drunk. Thr other is merely a fool

 

[JBeukema]

or is that 'us fools'...?

'we fools who post.';


'one of us...'


i need an English major or something/ Anyone know what that's supposed to be?

'we who are fools..'

I thin it;s 'we fools', byut I could be wrong

 

[JBeukema]

I'm still wary of approaching that ignorance. I've never met anyone so ignorant of what anarchism entails yet simultaneously arrogant and audacious about their lack of knowledge. It's a very unpleasant spectacle.

How so?

true (pure, unadulterated) anarchy rejects any governmental system as inherently hierarchal, tyrannical, and requiring the loss of liberty

What you have describes is a more recent neo-anarchic philosophy. whuich ultimately calls for a system based on social contract, demoncracy, and confederacy. democracy and confederacy are governmental forms, and therefore mutally exclusiove with 'true' (dare I say 'classical') anarchy

One has no protections under calssical anrchy ()read: the natural state'), which is why social contracts have given rose to a nmber of governmental systems which the people hopwe will protect their 'rights' or interests

You mean it isn't yet glaringly evident to you that he's just makes this shit up as he goes along??

i concluded that liong ago. i still theorize, assert that is the reason he has not yet responded

 

[manu1959]

tomorrow i will be sober yet you will still be ignorant........

 

[JBeukema]

tomorrow i will be sober yet you will still be ignorant........

Who the fuck are you, again?

 

[Annie]

tomorrow i will be sober yet you will still be ignorant........

Where have you been? Missed you! You're not sober now are you?

 

[Agnapostate]

i concluded that liong ago. i still theorize, assert that is the reason he has not yet responded

Truthfully, I also had an interest in saving you unnecessary embarrassment. As with STAND4AUTHORITY, you reduce that interest more and more with your blatant arrogance.

 

[AllieBaba]

or is that 'us fools'...?

'we fools who post.';


'one of us...'


i need an English major or something/ Anyone know what that's supposed to be?

'we who are fools..'

I thin it;s 'we fools', byut I could be wrong

I'm an English major.

But that information is classified and not distributed amongst drunken fools.