Dr Carson: House Negro or just a man that thinks for himself who happens to be black?

[EriktheRed]

Dr. Carson's life is an open book.

Then why is his rejection of evolution and hostility towards gays still mostly unknown? Oh wait, that wasn't in the book. The guy hasn't been vetted at all.

Don't start this vetting horseshit.

Why not? After all, President Obama was vetted more thoroughly than any candidate in US history. We have nothing to worry about, since it would be impossible to vet him more.

(And yes, we will laugh at any delusional rants about how Obama wasn't vetted, being someone would have to be a total raging 'tard to make a claim that stupid.)

Obama isn't worth the lint in Dr Carson's socks.

Your frothing irrational ODS is noted, and laughed at. Crank cultists like you aren't anything special.

Dr. Carson, while a skilled surgeon, is not a great logical thinker. His words reveal that. And he's got some ugly attitudes. And unlike Obama, who is an excellent off-the-cuff speaker, Dr. Carson doesn't seem to function well without a pre-written speech and teleprompter. If that's the great hope of your party, well, good luck with that.

(Conservatives, you may now toss out your well-worn race cards. Oddball, you can toss out 5 or 6, given you have so many.)

To nutbags such as himself not being vetted = not having their smears taken seriously by the public outside of wingnutland.

 

[Antares]

Good for you pop, now go read Obama's book before you open your yap again.

You are as racist as they get, but for you its ok...cause ****** earned it by keeping you down.

This Nation isn't racist, it has racists in it, including you, but the Nation isn't racist.

I know you, there are a million angry little men like you the world punk.

****** is your problem for everything...read Obama's book ..or are you one of those inner city kids who can't read?

Po? Do you know me? I think not...stop pretending that you do.

I'm sorry, but what you don't know would fill volumes. You certainly don't know me...and I plan to keep it that way. ******? Who could you ever be talking about, because I, as a rule, don't use or subscribe to racial pejoratives. I certainly don't refer to whites as "******"...so, kindly, keep your racism to yourself.
Kids? I'm a 60 year old black man, musician, published author, and producer. Are you a sacker at Kroger? Or flip burgers for Jack-In-The-Box?

 

[Antares]

Clearly you don't use racist language, what a moron.

The same Obama who called his grandfather a house ******.


Produce the evidence for that lie, you racist POS.

 

[Freewill]

The same Obama who called his grandfather a house ******.


Produce the evidence for that lie, you racist POS.

“My image of Onyango, faint as it was, had always been of an autocratic man—a cruel man, perhaps. But I had also imagined him an independent man, a man of his people, opposed to white rule… What Granny had told us scrambled that image completely, causing ugly words to flash across my mind. Uncle Tom. Collaborator. House ******.”

From "Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance:"

Read more: Why did Obama use the N-word to describe his grandfather? | Fox News

Read more: Why did Obama use the N-word to describe his grandfather? | Fox News

 

[Antares]

I wanted the po old racist to have to find it out for himself.

The same Obama who called his grandfather a house ******.



Produce the evidence for that lie, you racist POS.

“My image of Onyango, faint as it was, had always been of an autocratic man—a cruel man, perhaps. But I had also imagined him an independent man, a man of his people, opposed to white rule… What Granny had told us scrambled that image completely, causing ugly words to flash across my mind. Uncle Tom. Collaborator. House ******.”

From "Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance:"

Read more: Why did Obama use the N-word to describe his grandfather? | Fox News

Read more: Why did Obama use the N-word to describe his grandfather? | Fox News

 

[mamooth]

Remember when Abraham asks God if he'll spare the city if only one righteous man can be found there? I'm wondering if there's one righteous conservative on this thread who'll tell the other conservatives that all the race-baiting is uncool. I mean, God must be getting fed up with how conservatives are acting.

 

[poet]

Good for you pop, now go read Obama's book before you open your yap again.

You are as racist as they get, but for you its ok...cause ****** earned it by keeping you down.

This Nation isn't racist, it has racists in it, including you, but the Nation isn't racist.

I don't take instructions from kangaroos, real or imaginary, for starters. Or racist whites. I've read portions of President Obama's book. And?
My hundreds of white friends would laugh in your face at the thought of me being labeled "a racist". I also have "white" family....so, sorry, but you're barking up the wrongest tree.
And yes, by and large, this nation is racist....just look into the nearest mirror.

 

[Freewill]

I wanted the po old racist to have to find it out for himself

Sorry Ro, that wasn't gonna happen. The liberal left likes to stay low information voters, it is easier that way and it gives plausible deniability.

 

[Antares]

Then you are no more than an abject liar, because indeed Obama called his grandfather a house ******.


My wife is a beautiful black woman you moron....but she is at least has the integrity to (no pun intended) to call a spade a spade.

You are a shill and a racist.

Good for you pop, now go read Obama's book before you open your yap again.

You are as racist as they get, but for you its ok...cause ****** earned it by keeping you down.

This Nation isn't racist, it has racists in it, including you, but the Nation isn't racist.

I don't take instructions from kangaroos, real or imaginary, for starters. Or racist whites. I've read portions of President Obama's book. And?
My hundreds of white friends would laugh in your face at the thought of me being labeled "a racist". I also have "white" family....so, sorry, but you're barking up the wrongest tree.
And yes, by and large, this nation is racist....just look into the nearest mirror.

 

[logical4u]

Not an answer. You have no evidence of liberal leaders or even Democratic Party leaders attacking black conservatives or female conservatives because they are black or female.

How about the false witness against Tea Party members where congressional members intentionally tried to provoke Tea Party members by marching thru them at the Capitol Building (not their usual entrance). The Tea Party members were accused of being racists and hurling insults, even spitting, yet when a reward was offered for evidence of any of this being true (and there were plenty of news cameras, and personal cameras as well), no "evidence" was provided.

Well, if Rep. Eldridge Cleaver says he was spit upon and called racial pejoratives (and in the company of Rep. John Lewis), I believe him. He has no reason to lie. I believe him over you.

Cause politicians are honest???

 

[logical4u]

Well, how dare you assume that those of us on the left don't subscribe to the Lord in our lives. Just like you righties think you have the corner market on The Constitution (albeit, misrepresenting it, and using it as a wedge, to serve your agendas), you think you have the corner on religion, faith, morality and righteousness. You do not. Those of us on the left just don't use The Bible, abusively, and claim to know the mind of God. There are other religions and faiths beside Christianity which The Constitution protects....but your bigotry blinds you to that. And so, therefore, you're a hypocrite, of the 1st order.

I am not blind to other religions. I respect the right of the individual to worship as they please. I have a problem when their "religion" intrudes onto other people's rights (Shariah law).
I "assume" people that support "baby executions" (abortion), Obamacare (President said that the elderly will be given a pill, to help ease their life away), experimenting on people (embryonic research), and the declaration that homosexual "marriage" (not civil union, not legal union, but "marriage") is the "right thing to do" (directly against Biblical teachings), are not paying attention to the LORD. Instead, they seemed to have declared the "authority" to NULL the LORD's WORD. So please explain to me how that supports "religion, faith, morality, and righteousness.

Oh, you know I have that same problem...when certain "Christians" want to instruct me on how to be a "good Christian", and are not above, pointing out "certain scriptures" (or at least, their take on it) to ensure that I follow their particular brand of Christianity, which includes condemnation of sins (though they be sinners as well) and all sorts of hypocrisy.
So all that hating on Sharia law, unlessen you aim your arrows at the "Christian Right", for doing the exact same thing (wishing their extremism onto others) then you're a hypocrite.
Abortion, for your information is not "baby executions", as fetuses are not yet "babies".
The President said no such thing...produce the evidence for that lie. Stem cell research, which Nancy Reagan supports is vital to the lives of the people who stand to be restored by it. You can forget your objections to "marriage equality"...as your side continues to cave in to the inevitable. And "you lie". There are no Biblical teachings objecting to "gay marriage" as it didn't exist, as we know it today, back then. Stop lying.
And you saying that they (meaning "us") have declared the Lord's Word, "null and void" doesn't make it true or valid. I am a non-practicing Episcopalian, by faith...more spiritual than religious, and I believe myself to be moral, and righteous, and have a personal relationship with the Almighty. Who are you to judge me otherwise? No one.

Thank you for the "dodge". I asked you to explain how you could support these things as a "Christian", and instead of you telling me that you do not support these murderous policies, you go total defensive (implies that you are well aware these things are going on with the progressives, but now that the spotlight is on your knowledge of them, you are ashamed, so attack the messenger.

I did not "tell" you how to be a good Christian. Your relationship with the LORD is none of my business. I do have a problem with your false representation of a party that works directly against the teachings of the LORD, while you want to pretend your party is in step with the LORD. It is not, it supports some truly evil policies.

A pregnant woman is "with child". Ending the pregnancy is "ending" the child. Since it is "legal" (that is not the same as "moral"), it is an execution "order". When the order is complete, that child was "executed".

The President in his own words..... take a pill
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-dQfb8WQvo]Obama to Jane Sturm: Hey, take a pill - YouTube[/ame]

"Stem cell" research is different than embryonic research. One takes stem cells from adults that are "living" (they can produce more of the same cells). The other takes eggs from young women (not sure of the affects this causes, besides limiting or eliminating children for those women). This President signed an executive order Executive Order 13505 -- Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells | The White House with authorizes the taxpayer (the gov't) to fund the creation and destruction of human embryos (human experimentation).

Homosexuals trying to define marriage? Tell me, you that claim to be "Christian", how did Yeshua describe a "marriage"?
Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

<< Mark 10 >>

6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and be joined to his wife;

8 And they two shall be one flesh: so then they are no more two, but one flesh.

9 What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder.


Are you "confused" about the description of "marriage" by the LORD?

You are the one that claims you are "moral", and a "Christian". Apparently, you think you have the authority to overturn what the LORD has taught us. By what authority do you reject HIS WORD, and replace it with "man's words"? Sorry, I see no "righteousness", just more corruption. Don't feel bad, corruption travels with socialism/communism/progressivism/homosexual activists/Islamic extremists. It starts with deceit and gets worse from there.

 

[poet]

I am not blind to other religions. I respect the right of the individual to worship as they please. I have a problem when their "religion" intrudes onto other people's rights (Shariah law).
I "assume" people that support "baby executions" (abortion), Obamacare (President said that the elderly will be given a pill, to help ease their life away), experimenting on people (embryonic research), and the declaration that homosexual "marriage" (not civil union, not legal union, but "marriage") is the "right thing to do" (directly against Biblical teachings), are not paying attention to the LORD. Instead, they seemed to have declared the "authority" to NULL the LORD's WORD. So please explain to me how that supports "religion, faith, morality, and righteousness.

Oh, you know I have that same problem...when certain "Christians" want to instruct me on how to be a "good Christian", and are not above, pointing out "certain scriptures" (or at least, their take on it) to ensure that I follow their particular brand of Christianity, which includes condemnation of sins (though they be sinners as well) and all sorts of hypocrisy.
So all that hating on Sharia law, unlessen you aim your arrows at the "Christian Right", for doing the exact same thing (wishing their extremism onto others) then you're a hypocrite.
Abortion, for your information is not "baby executions", as fetuses are not yet "babies".
The President said no such thing...produce the evidence for that lie. Stem cell research, which Nancy Reagan supports is vital to the lives of the people who stand to be restored by it. You can forget your objections to "marriage equality"...as your side continues to cave in to the inevitable. And "you lie". There are no Biblical teachings objecting to "gay marriage" as it didn't exist, as we know it today, back then. Stop lying.
And you saying that they (meaning "us") have declared the Lord's Word, "null and void" doesn't make it true or valid. I am a non-practicing Episcopalian, by faith...more spiritual than religious, and I believe myself to be moral, and righteous, and have a personal relationship with the Almighty. Who are you to judge me otherwise? No one.

Thank you for the "dodge". I asked you to explain how you could support these things as a "Christian", and instead of you telling me that you do not support these murderous policies, you go total defensive (implies that you are well aware these things are going on with the progressives, but now that the spotlight is on your knowledge of them, you are ashamed, so attack the messenger.

I did not "tell" you how to be a good Christian. Your relationship with the LORD is none of my business. I do have a problem with your false representation of a party that works directly against the teachings of the LORD, while you want to pretend your party is in step with the LORD. It is not, it supports some truly evil policies.

A pregnant woman is "with child". Ending the pregnancy is "ending" the child. Since it is "legal" (that is not the same as "moral"), it is an execution "order". When the order is complete, that child was "executed".

The President in his own words..... take a pill
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-dQfb8WQvo]Obama to Jane Sturm: Hey, take a pill - YouTube[/ame]

"Stem cell" research is different than embryonic research. One takes stem cells from adults that are "living" (they can produce more of the same cells). The other takes eggs from young women (not sure of the affects this causes, besides limiting or eliminating children for those women). This President signed an executive order Executive Order 13505 -- Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells | The White House with authorizes the taxpayer (the gov't) to fund the creation and destruction of human embryos (human experimentation).

Homosexuals trying to define marriage? Tell me, you that claim to be "Christian", how did Yeshua describe a "marriage"?
Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

<< Mark 10 >>

6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and be joined to his wife;

8 And they two shall be one flesh: so then they are no more two, but one flesh.

9 What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder.


Are you "confused" about the description of "marriage" by the LORD?

You are the one that claims you are "moral", and a "Christian". Apparently, you think you have the authority to overturn what the LORD has taught us. By what authority do you reject HIS WORD, and replace it with "man's words"? Sorry, I see no "righteousness", just more corruption. Don't feel bad, corruption travels with socialism/communism/progressivism/homosexual activists/Islamic extremists. It starts with deceit and gets worse from there.

Wow. The poster child for bigot d' jour. Sorry, but I don't subscribe to your particular brand of Christianity, which corrupts scripture to condemn others that don't view life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, in your way. It's you who is judging me...something Christ told us all, specifically not to do...but you have yours coming....we all do. It just won't be you in the judgment seat. Now **** off.

 

[logical4u]

Well, how dare you assume that those of us on the left don't subscribe to the Lord in our lives. Just like you righties think you have the corner market on The Constitution (albeit, misrepresenting it, and using it as a wedge, to serve your agendas), you think you have the corner on religion, faith, morality and righteousness. You do not. Those of us on the left just don't use The Bible, abusively, and claim to know the mind of God. There are other religions and faiths beside Christianity which The Constitution protects....but your bigotry blinds you to that. And so, therefore, you're a hypocrite, of the 1st order.

Stop. First, Liberals claim to know when a human being is human, then you seem to suggest that God condones homosexuality. You guys try to play God on a regular basis! You even think to know the mind of God! You try to use the Bible to justify bigger government, redistributionist policy, gay marriage... anything that jibes with the Democrat-Liberal-Left leaning platform. It is true the Constitution protects other religions, but as of now, Christianity seems to be the only one under attack at the moment.

Excuse me? Stop. First, you, as a conservative claim to know when a human being is a human. How about no one has the corner on that market...making us equal in the quest to be right. Who is to say? I don't say God condones homosexuality, I say I believe he doesn't think it's important, one way or another. Some people choose to be celibate, their whole lives long...do you think that pleases or displeases God? Some people choose to marry, divorce, re-marry, divorce, commit adultery, etc....Do you think that pleases or displeases God. I think he doesn't care, one way or another. It being about man's free will and all.
Humans make a big ta-doo about sexuality and such. How do you know God does? Because what is written in the Bible, from 3 or 4 thousand years ago? Written by whom? And to what end? Give me a ******* break.
And just as you use the Bible to dismantle government, claiming that government is all-intrusive, yet you seek to control women's bodies and its' contents, and dictate who can and cannot marry, while increasing the coffers of the rich at the expense of the middle class and the poor. Talk about hypocrisy. If we looked up the word, probably your picture would be there.
Christianity under attack? I suggest to you that those so-called "Christians" that feel they are being attacked, are no real Christians....they are pompous, evil, misguided demagogues, in need of a good ass whooping. Like you, for instance.

Maybe should actually pay attention to what it says in the Bible.
.....
What are some examples of these sins? From the Ten Commandments we have false worship, idolatry, misusing God's name, violating the Sabbath, dishonoring parents, murder, adultery, stealing, lying/libel, and coveting. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7), Jesus took some of these same sins to a new level. Regarding murder, Jesus said, “Anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment.... But anyone who says, 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell” (Matthew 5:22). Regarding adultery, Jesus said, “Anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28). In Galatians 5:19-21, we are told, “The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.” Just these brief lists will give most people plenty of things to work on for a lifetime. In addition to the various lists that can be found in Scripture, we are told in 1 John 5:17 that “all wrongdoing is sin.” Not only does the Bible tell us the things not to do, but in James 4:17, we are informed that anyone “who knows the good he ought to do and doesn't do it, sins.”
....

Read more: Is there a biblical list of sins?

and then one of my favorites, a sinner is about to be killed, Yeshua intervenes, and what does he tell her:
John 8:11

King James Version (KJV)


11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

Just in case you were wondering (in all your spirituality) what Yeshua told the sinners.....

 

[logical4u]

He is a homophobe. He will do.fine at fox.

That's not fair. After all, he totally fauxpoligized for comparing gays to NAMBLA members and bestiality fans. You know, one of those weasel-like "I'm sorry you were offended" non-apologies.

Oh, he also rejects the theory of evolution, and says that anyone who accepts it has no ethics. Yep, bright future in the GOP.

And naturally, I'll now be accused of attacking him because he's black.

Okay, it is not "scientific" to support evolution (Darwinism), and at the same time support homosexuality. "Darwinsim" states that sex is ONLY for reproduction! It is not for pleasure, comfort, "loooove", etc, ONLY for reproduction (that leaves the homosexuals out of it). So yes, I can see why he would say they had no ethics if they claimed belief in "evolution" (cause chances are they were gettin' busy for reasons other than "procreation").

 

[logical4u]

Carson is sort of typical of black conservatives. He just can't accept that the path available for him was only open because other people cleared it for him.

The same path that is open to the people with a 13.8% unemployment rate? What is the matter with the other blacks (since you are implying other people picked him up)?

 

[mamooth]

Then you are no more than an abject liar, because indeed Obama called his grandfather a house ******.

Er, no. He described a thought that ran through his head.

That's not "calling". At least not to a non-liar. But then, you have ODS, so to you, literally any lie about Obama is justifiable.

So, are there any honest conservatives who will call out their brethren over the avalanche of lies they spew out? Or have they all sworn allegiance to the liars' cult?

 

[logical4u]

Good for you pop, now go read Obama's book before you open your yap again.

You are as racist as they get, but for you its ok...cause ****** earned it by keeping you down.

This Nation isn't racist, it has racists in it, including you, but the Nation isn't racist.

I don't take instructions from kangaroos, real or imaginary, for starters. Or racist whites. I've read portions of President Obama's book. And?
My hundreds of white friends would laugh in your face at the thought of me being labeled "a racist". I also have "white" family....so, sorry, but you're barking up the wrongest tree.
And yes, by and large, this nation is racist....just look into the nearest mirror.

So you have "white" friends, and that makes you NOT a racist? (sorry, couldn't resist that jab).

 

[mamooth]

"Darwinsim" states that sex is ONLY for reproduction!

No it doesn't. Who fed you such nonsense?

It's not just reproduction that matters, it's reproduction and survival. Reproduction is pointless if the offspring all die. Non-reproductive sex can aid in survival by keeping individuals together for mutual protection.

 

[Antares]

Uh, no....he denied Obama said what he said AFTER claiming to have read his book...

That makes him a liar, sorry.

Then you are no more than an abject liar, because indeed Obama called his grandfather a house ******.

Er, no. He described a thought that ran through his head.

That's not "calling". At least not to a non-liar. But then, you have ODS, so to you, literally any lie about Obama is justifiable.

So, are there any honest conservatives who will call out their brethren over the avalanche of lies they spew out? Or have they all sworn allegiance to the liars' cult?

 

[logical4u]

Oh, you know I have that same problem...when certain "Christians" want to instruct me on how to be a "good Christian", and are not above, pointing out "certain scriptures" (or at least, their take on it) to ensure that I follow their particular brand of Christianity, which includes condemnation of sins (though they be sinners as well) and all sorts of hypocrisy.
So all that hating on Sharia law, unlessen you aim your arrows at the "Christian Right", for doing the exact same thing (wishing their extremism onto others) then you're a hypocrite.
Abortion, for your information is not "baby executions", as fetuses are not yet "babies".
The President said no such thing...produce the evidence for that lie. Stem cell research, which Nancy Reagan supports is vital to the lives of the people who stand to be restored by it. You can forget your objections to "marriage equality"...as your side continues to cave in to the inevitable. And "you lie". There are no Biblical teachings objecting to "gay marriage" as it didn't exist, as we know it today, back then. Stop lying.
And you saying that they (meaning "us") have declared the Lord's Word, "null and void" doesn't make it true or valid. I am a non-practicing Episcopalian, by faith...more spiritual than religious, and I believe myself to be moral, and righteous, and have a personal relationship with the Almighty. Who are you to judge me otherwise? No one.

Thank you for the "dodge". I asked you to explain how you could support these things as a "Christian", and instead of you telling me that you do not support these murderous policies, you go total defensive (implies that you are well aware these things are going on with the progressives, but now that the spotlight is on your knowledge of them, you are ashamed, so attack the messenger.

I did not "tell" you how to be a good Christian. Your relationship with the LORD is none of my business. I do have a problem with your false representation of a party that works directly against the teachings of the LORD, while you want to pretend your party is in step with the LORD. It is not, it supports some truly evil policies.

A pregnant woman is "with child". Ending the pregnancy is "ending" the child. Since it is "legal" (that is not the same as "moral"), it is an execution "order". When the order is complete, that child was "executed".

The President in his own words..... take a pill
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-dQfb8WQvo]Obama to Jane Sturm: Hey, take a pill - YouTube[/ame]

"Stem cell" research is different than embryonic research. One takes stem cells from adults that are "living" (they can produce more of the same cells). The other takes eggs from young women (not sure of the affects this causes, besides limiting or eliminating children for those women). This President signed an executive order Executive Order 13505 -- Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells | The White House with authorizes the taxpayer (the gov't) to fund the creation and destruction of human embryos (human experimentation).

Homosexuals trying to define marriage? Tell me, you that claim to be "Christian", how did Yeshua describe a "marriage"?
Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

<< Mark 10 >>

6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and be joined to his wife;

8 And they two shall be one flesh: so then they are no more two, but one flesh.

9 What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder.


Are you "confused" about the description of "marriage" by the LORD?

You are the one that claims you are "moral", and a "Christian". Apparently, you think you have the authority to overturn what the LORD has taught us. By what authority do you reject HIS WORD, and replace it with "man's words"? Sorry, I see no "righteousness", just more corruption. Don't feel bad, corruption travels with socialism/communism/progressivism/homosexual activists/Islamic extremists. It starts with deceit and gets worse from there.

Wow. The poster child for bigot d' jour. Sorry, but I don't subscribe to your particular brand of Christianity, which corrupts scripture to condemn others that don't view life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, in your way. It's you who is judging me...something Christ told us all, specifically not to do...but you have yours coming....we all do. It just won't be you in the judgment seat. Now **** off.

Is that an example of you treating me, like your "neighbor"? How Christian of you....
You asked for proof, I gave you four different instances (one for each one that you questioned).

TAKE A GOOD LOOK PEOPLE, THIS IS WHAT ME MEAN WHEN WE SAY "WILLFULLY" IGNORANT.
It is your choice to seek knowledge, or NOT. It is your choice to live according to HIS WORD, or NOT. To the rest of us, your choice is obvious.

Personally, I believe in a loving and forgiving LORD. There is hope for you. I will be in the sinner line, right behind you, and I hope HE will be loving and forgiving for me too!