JLW
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2012
- 18,280
- 20,148
- 2,405
In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, right-wing influencers and at least one Trump administration official have actively encouraged people to scour the internet for remarks celebrating the killing and to expose those who have posted them online.
The widespread and fast-moving campaign of naming-and-shaming has already resulted in countless lost jobs, professional suspensions and internal investigations, exacerbating the already fraught tensions over the shooting that exist online.…
Among those personalities have been far-right agitators like Laura Loomer and Chaya Raichik, who runs a large account on X called Libs of TikTok. Since the shooting, they and dozens of other online influencers have taken it upon themselves to recruit ordinary Americans to turn in fellow citizens for making comments about Mr. Kirk that may be nasty or disparaging, but are likely protected by the First Amendment...
[However this form of doxxing is not limited to the rightwing but is part of the leftwing playbook as well]
Left-wing activists have used similar tactics in the past to draw attention to overtly racist or anti-gay remarks online, in an effort to bring public censure to the people posting them. Right-wing activists have pushed back hard against these efforts, branding them as examples of “cancel culture.”
Teams of digital sleuths, calling themselves “Sedition Hunters,” also played a large role in identifying rioters who took part in the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. But the people they focused on generally appeared to be involved in criminal activity rather than constitutionally protected speech, and the information they collected was often handed over to the traditional authorities for further possible use.
In February, after news outlets identified employees of Elon Musk’s government-slashing agency, the Department of Governmental Efficiency, Ed Martin, then serving as the top federal prosecutor in Washington, promised Mr. Musk in a letterthat his office would “pursue any and all legal action against anyone who impedes your work or threatens your people.”
**************************
Personally I find this form of doxxing and cancel culture odious whether from the left or right. I think you should be able to speak your mind online without facing the threat of losing your job so long you are not engaging in any illegal activity. I think scouring the Internet to find individuals who post incendiary, controversial or odious comments to publicity humiliate them in another forum just stifles freedom of expression as well as creates even greater divisions.
Are you even safe in sites like this where you are supposedly anonymous?
This phenomena comes from both the left and right so in a perverse way it is nonpartisan.
Are you in for or against doxxing those that disagree with you or to score political points?
The widespread and fast-moving campaign of naming-and-shaming has already resulted in countless lost jobs, professional suspensions and internal investigations, exacerbating the already fraught tensions over the shooting that exist online.…
Among those personalities have been far-right agitators like Laura Loomer and Chaya Raichik, who runs a large account on X called Libs of TikTok. Since the shooting, they and dozens of other online influencers have taken it upon themselves to recruit ordinary Americans to turn in fellow citizens for making comments about Mr. Kirk that may be nasty or disparaging, but are likely protected by the First Amendment...
[However this form of doxxing is not limited to the rightwing but is part of the leftwing playbook as well]
Left-wing activists have used similar tactics in the past to draw attention to overtly racist or anti-gay remarks online, in an effort to bring public censure to the people posting them. Right-wing activists have pushed back hard against these efforts, branding them as examples of “cancel culture.”
Teams of digital sleuths, calling themselves “Sedition Hunters,” also played a large role in identifying rioters who took part in the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. But the people they focused on generally appeared to be involved in criminal activity rather than constitutionally protected speech, and the information they collected was often handed over to the traditional authorities for further possible use.
In February, after news outlets identified employees of Elon Musk’s government-slashing agency, the Department of Governmental Efficiency, Ed Martin, then serving as the top federal prosecutor in Washington, promised Mr. Musk in a letterthat his office would “pursue any and all legal action against anyone who impedes your work or threatens your people.”
**************************
Personally I find this form of doxxing and cancel culture odious whether from the left or right. I think you should be able to speak your mind online without facing the threat of losing your job so long you are not engaging in any illegal activity. I think scouring the Internet to find individuals who post incendiary, controversial or odious comments to publicity humiliate them in another forum just stifles freedom of expression as well as creates even greater divisions.
Are you even safe in sites like this where you are supposedly anonymous?
This phenomena comes from both the left and right so in a perverse way it is nonpartisan.
Are you in for or against doxxing those that disagree with you or to score political points?