DONE - GOING TO JAIL! -- Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release'

[easyt65]

Wildman, I apologize. I misread your post (at 2am ). You are correct - NBC & CBS, our 'grandfathers' news source back in the day', has failed to mention it, for whatever reason. I humbly apologize for my mistake.

Awwwww. How sweet!

It's called an 'apology' and accepting responsibility - owning up to one's actions.... something Liberals, who like to blame others, don't like to do and is something you will never see Hillary do.

 

[Jackson]

I just looked on MSNBC and CNN. Either you can't read or you lie.

are you talking to me..?? LIE? never.., you must be lying because you apparently did NOT read correctly.

NBC,CBS had no reference to this TOP STORY, FOX, CNN, CBS ... DID!!

Never Lie? Just an easy mistake, huh? NBC and CBS DID have references to this timely catastrophic Hilary story. Even Obama says they are too sensitive to be released even with items redacted.

http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/22-emails-from-clinton-s-private-server-have-been-declared-
top-secret-611866691644



22 "top secret" Hillary Clinton
emails won't be released
The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained some of the U.S. government's most closely guarded secrets, censoring 22 emails with material demanding one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.
The State Department released the latest batch of emails from Clinton's time as secretary of state on Friday evening. But seven email chains are being withheld in full because they contain information deemed to be "top secret." The 37 pages include messages recently described by a key intelligence official as concerning so-called "special access programs" - a highly restricted subset of classified material that could point to confidential sources or clandestine programs like drone strikes or government eavesdropping.
Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon on Friday indicated on Twitter that the campaign wants all of the emails at least partially released:
The decision to keep 22 emails secret "flies in the face of the fact that these emails were unmarked at the time they were sent, and have been called 'innocuous' by certain intelligence officials," Fallon continued. "We understand that these emails were likely originated on the State Department's unclassified system before they were ever shared with Secretary Clinton, and they have remained on the department's unclassified system for years. And, in at least one case, the emails appear to involve information from a published news article."

22 "top secret" Hillary Clinton emails won't be released

 

[Iceweasel]

This thread is bookmarked for future entertainment.

Another Hillbot chimes in, should be fun, thanks.

Ya'll should start your own alternate reality show. lol

Funny, seeing as you're the one with the video clip of made up shit in your signature. You fool no one.

 

[easyt65]

Shadow, you're a 'special' kind of stupid, aren't you?! Crimes have already been identified. As I said, upon leaving the State Department Hillary had to give up access to all classified information. She certainly was not authorized to take and keep any home with her. Simply by HAVING any classified information, let alone TOP SECRET, she has broken the law.

There is no way to spin it.

There is no way to make it go away.

Even if she can convince anyone that she has over 1,000 pieces of classified information in her possession by ACCIDENT the FBI still can charge her for over 1,000 counts of 'negligence' under the Espionage Act....

...and that's not counting her already proven crimes like failing to sign a mandatory govt document required by law stating she took the training required regarding the handling of classified information when she got her clearance...

Crimes have already been proven....

As liberals and Hillary-apologists have declared, though, there is a big difference between proving she broke laws and getting the DOJ or Obama to do anything about it. After all, Eric Holder is NOT in jail today where he should be because the DOJ and Obama protected him from prosecution.

(Holder and Hillary are rather different, though. While she is part of his story in office and her actions reflect on his 'legacy' - which he wants to protect, that may not be enough for Obama to 'save' her. Yeah, he saved Holder....but Holder was black, protected his ass, and he LIKED Holder )

 

[Jackson]

Those indictments had better fly, or else some folks are gonna look silly.

What indictments?

She has been under scrutiny for months ; and yet nothing has became of the whole fiasco. Kind of hard to
pull the rug out from under a Presidential Candidate.

I will bet she was just top of the class of her law school.


Shadow 355

You obviously don't understand what 'UNDER INVESTIGATION' means...

Hundreds......if thousands of people have been under investigation and not indicted.

The investigation is a "Witch hunt", and or personally motivated.

Law Enforcement is going in the wrong direction.

The prosecutor(s) do not know what they are doing.

False and fabricated charges - false affidavits and / or witness testimony. Possibly planted or fabricated evidence.

People have been under investigation for months......or years and never arrested, or had their case presented to a Grand Jury ; because there is not enough evidence to forward the charges. Or circumstantial evidence gets them indicted, and the evidence does not hold evidence in court. Even the fully tattooed man, with unkempt hair and painted fingernails......is innocent of the charges against them. The female with a history of daytime burglary, drug use and assault........is innocent. The prosecutor needs handcuffed and placed in the basement of a dungeon.

I have been in life too long and in public safety for a great number of years, not to know that some people are simply "railroaded". But someone thinks they can get and indictment / conviction.

Shadow 355

Those indictments had better fly, or else some folks are gonna look silly.

What indictments?

She has been under scrutiny for months ; and yet nothing has became of the whole fiasco. Kind of hard to
pull the rug out from under a Presidential Candidate.

I will bet she was just top of the class of her law school.


Shadow 355

You obviously don't understand what 'UNDER INVESTIGATION' means...

Hundreds......if thousands of people have been under investigation and not indicted.

The investigation is a "Witch hunt", and or personally motivated.

Law Enforcement is going in the wrong direction.

The prosecutor(s) do not know what they are doing.

False and fabricated charges - false affidavits and / or witness testimony. Possibly planted or fabricated evidence.

People have been under investigation for months......or years and never arrested, or had their case presented to a Grand Jury ; because there is not enough evidence to forward the charges. Or circumstantial evidence gets them indicted, and the evidence does not hold evidence in court. Even the fully tattooed man, with unkempt hair and painted fingernails......is innocent of the charges against them. The female with a history of daytime burglary, drug use and assault........is innocent. The prosecutor needs handcuffed and placed in the basement of a dungeon.

I have been in life too long and in public safety for a great number of years, not to know that some people are simply "railroaded". But someone thinks they can get and indictment / conviction.

Shadow 355

Those indictments had better fly, or else some folks are gonna look silly.

What indictments?

She has been under scrutiny for months ; and yet nothing has became of the whole fiasco. Kind of hard to
pull the rug out from under a Presidential Candidate.

I will bet she was just top of the class of her law school.


Shadow 355

You obviously don't understand what 'UNDER INVESTIGATION' means...

Hundreds......if thousands of people have been under investigation and not indicted.

The investigation is a "Witch hunt", and or personally motivated.

Law Enforcement is going in the wrong direction.

The prosecutor(s) do not know what they are doing.

False and fabricated charges - false affidavits and / or witness testimony. Possibly planted or fabricated evidence.

People have been under investigation for months......or years and never arrested, or had their case presented to a Grand Jury ; because there is not enough evidence to forward the charges. Or circumstantial evidence gets them indicted, and the evidence does not hold evidence in court. Even the fully tattooed man, with unkempt hair and painted fingernails......is innocent of the charges against them. The female with a history of daytime burglary, drug use and assault........is innocent. The prosecutor needs handcuffed and placed in the basement of a dungeon.

I have been in life too long and in public safety for a great number of years, not to know that some people are simply "railroaded". But someone thinks they can get and indictment / conviction.

Shadow 355

"
Hundreds......if thousands of people have been under investigation and not indicted."

Not when they had access to TOP SECRET and Beyond, did not turn them over to the State when leaving office and kept on an unsecured server.

"People have been under investigation for months......or years and never arrested, or had their case presented to a Grand Jury ; because there is not enough evidence to forward the charges. Or circumstantial evidence gets them indicted, and the evidence does not hold evidence in court. "

When the WH and Intelligence Agencies declare the documents in question where some of the most sensitive the nation had... the evidence coudn't be any stronger

"The investigation is a "Witch hunt", and or personally motivated."

That hardly deserves an answer, lol. Take that up with the president, SoS and intelligence experts.

So, what it boils down to, that regardless of how corrupt and inept she is, you will cry "LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES" and want her for president. Don't you care for your country more than this?

 

[rightwinger]

Prosecutor: Sec Clinton, why did you maintain a private server?

Sec Clinton: My agency authorized me to do so

From that point on, all subsequent security violations are on the agency

 

[Iceweasel]

I'm waiting for her to pout the 'vast right wing conspiracy' defense.

 

[Redfish]

Ohhh--lots of high crimes.

I guess Hillary better flee like Nixon

what would she resign from? bitchdom?

 

[Care4all]

Not classified secret or classified top secret etc and marked as such,when she received them....

so she got no classified intel, with all the Libya stuff going on? You're a classic example of brainwashing.

Actually, it's the right wing echo chamber that has done a good job brainwashing you all on the right.

The emails she received were generated from the unclassified .gov email system, and were not marked or designated SECRET or top SECRET when she received them. Some email chains received/sent by her are now being designated/ marked classified before the FOIA release.

NONE, ABSOLUTELY NONE of these now classified top SECRET emails that she received through the .gov state dept email system came from the government's Top secret email system, they were from the government's UNCLASSIFIED .gov email system. No one took top secrets from the Top secret email system and put them on the unclassified .gov system.

So yes, nothing she received from the State department, was classified secret or top SECRET, at the time the email communication took place.

Do you understand now?

 

[Jackson]

Prosecutor: Sec Clinton, why did you maintain a private server?

Sec Clinton: My agency authorized me to do so

From that point on, all subsequent security violations are on the agency

I think you need a link for that.

Disagree anyway. Why was Clinton telling others to use a secure server, admitting the danger of possible hacking, and refuse to do so herself. "She did it for convenience and probably in hindsight made a poor decision." Those were her words, not that her agency authorized her to use it.

There is no getting around it, denying doesn't help, the truth has come out..and not from Republican sources, lol.

 

[Redfish]

Prosecutor: Sec Clinton, why did you maintain a private server?

Sec Clinton: My agency authorized me to do so

From that point on, all subsequent security violations are on the agency

Bullshit. a person holding a security clearance is personally responsible for the security of classified data in their possession.

 

[Conservative65]

Here's a solution. Don't do things wrong and you won't get investigated by the FBI.

Because only guilty people are ever investigated, right?

Hate to break it to you but the FBI doesn't work under the concept of we'll look to see if we find anything. They look when they believe there is something needing to be found. Someone as smart as you claim to be should know that.

False! What do "think" tapping phones and bugging computers is for , laughs and giggles?

Are you saying the FBI picks phone numbers at random in order to see what someone is saying?

Yep.
Patriot act ring any bells?

Shows the only thing you know about it is the name.

 

[rightwinger]

Not classified secret or classified top secret etc and marked as such,when she received them....

so she got no classified intel, with all the Libya stuff going on? You're a classic example of brainwashing.

Actually, it's the right wing echo chamber that has done a good job brainwashing you all on the right.

The emails she received were generated from the unclassified .gov email system, and were not marked or designated SECRET or top SECRET when she received them. Some email chains received/sent by her are now being designated/ marked classified before the FOIA release.

NONE, ABSOLUTELY NONE of these now classified top SECRET emails that she received through the .gov state dept email system came from the government's Top secret email system, they were from the government's UNCLASSIFIED .gov email system.

So yes, nothing she received from the State department, was classified secret or top SECRET, at the time the email communication took place.

Do you understand now?

If someone sends a secret document to an unclassified account.....the violation is on the sender

Why aren't Republicans going after the sender of those emails?

 

[Iceweasel]

Not classified secret or classified top secret etc and marked as such,when she received them....

so she got no classified intel, with all the Libya stuff going on? You're a classic example of brainwashing.

Actually, it's the right wing echo chamber that has done a good job brainwashing you all on the right.

The emails she received were generated from the unclassified .gov email system, and were not marked or designated SECRET or top SECRET when she received them. Some email chains received/sent by her are now being designated/ marked classified before the FOIA release.

NONE, ABSOLUTELY NONE of these now classified top SECRET emails that she received through the .gov state dept email system came from the government's Top secret email system, they were from the government's UNCLASSIFIED .gov email system.

So yes, nothing she received from the State department, was classified secret or top SECRET, at the time the email communication took place.

Do you understand now?

Yes, I understand your desperation. It's like a Muslim protecting Alah. You want us to believe she was unaware of anything top secret in nature, even though Libya was blowing up and that she used her own personal server as a simple minded mistake as well.



But you're a little slow on the draw:

Despite What Her Campaign Wants You to Believe, Hillary Clinton Did Send Top Secret Emails on Her Homebrew Server
In any case, it turns out that the report was wrong, and Clinton did indeed send at least 22 emails classified as top secret, according to an Associated Press report this afternoon.


These emails were classified as “special access programs,” according to Politico, which means they were compartmentalized within the top secret designation; even top secret clearance wouldn’t necessarily be enough to get someone access to these communications.

The State Department has slowly making Clinton’s emails public over the last few months, following a court order, but not complying with it fully: A federal judge had ordered the emails to be completely released by the end of today, but instead, only about 1,000 of the 9,000 remaining pages of email will be released later tonight.

So far, about 1,300 of Clinton’s emails have been labeled classified at some level. Today was the first time, however, that any had been confirmed to be classified top secret. So far, classified emails have been redacted for release. The top secret emails revealed today won’t be released in any way; they’ll simply be withheld.

 

[easyt65]

]

Prosecutor: Sec Clinton, why did you maintain a private server?

Sec Clinton: My agency authorized me to do so

From that point on, all subsequent security violations are on the agency

Sorry, but no.

They may have authorized her to have her own server, but...

- they did not tell her she could break the law by storing classified on a server that did not meet legal requirements for the safe ssecure storage of classified info

- they did not give her the authority to break the law by combining SECRET and TOP SECRET info on one server

- they did not autherize her to allow that server to be held, stored, and maintained in the bathroom of a small tech company whose employees did not have the legally required security clearances to do so

- they did not autherize her to violate laws requiring her to turn over to them copies of all state dept-related documents

- they did authorize her to break the law by keeping classified info, especially TS info, once she stepped down from the state dept and was 'read out' of those TS programs

Once again liberals demonstrate their affinity for blaming others and their abhorance of taking personal responsibility.

- 'It's not MY red line - It's the WORLD's red line

- The state dept said Hillary could have her own personal server so every crime she committed using it after that is the state dept's fault....

FAIL / WRONG.

 

[rightwinger]

Prosecutor: Sec Clinton, why did you maintain a private server?

Sec Clinton: My agency authorized me to do so

From that point on, all subsequent security violations are on the agency

Bullshit. a person holding a security clearance is personally responsible for the security of classified data in their possession.

Exactly

And classified documents need to be identified as such before they are sent. If Hillary received a Top Secret document on her private server, she would be expected t report the spillage

She can't do that on unmarked documents. Nor can she determine that this information may someday be reclassified

 

[easyt65]

Not classified secret or classified top secret etc and marked as such,when she received them....

so she got no classified intel, with all the Libya stuff going on? You're a classic example of brainwashing.

Actually, it's the right wing echo chamber that has done a good job brainwashing you all on the right.

The emails she received were generated from the unclassified .gov email system, and were not marked or designated SECRET or top SECRET when she received them. Some email chains received/sent by her are now being designated/ marked classified before the FOIA release.

NONE, ABSOLUTELY NONE of these now classified top SECRET emails that she received through the .gov state dept email system came from the government's Top secret email system, they were from the government's UNCLASSIFIED .gov email system.

So yes, nothing she received from the State department, was classified secret or top SECRET, at the time the email communication took place.

Do you understand now?

If someone sends a secret document to an unclassified account.....the violation is on the sender

Why aren't Republicans going after the sender of those emails?

The REPUBLICANS aren't conducting the investigation - the FBI, led by the man Obama appointed, is. The FBI also IS going after some of the 'senders'. Frim what I renember reading, Huna, for example, has already been talked to as part of the investigation...

 

[rightwinger]

]

Prosecutor: Sec Clinton, why did you maintain a private server?

Sec Clinton: My agency authorized me to do so

From that point on, all subsequent security violations are on the agency

Sorry, but no.

They may have authorized her to have her own server, but...

- they did not tell her she could break the law by storing classified on a server that did not meet legal requirements for the safe ssecure storage of classified info

- they did not give her the authority to break the law by combining SECRET and TOP SECRET info on one server

- they did not autherize her to allow that server to be held, stored, and maintained in the bathroom of a small tech company whose employees did not have the legally required security clearances to do so

- they did not autherize her to violate laws requiring her to turn over to them copies of all state dept-related documents

- they did authorize her to break the law by keeping classified info, especially TS info, once she stepped down from the state dept and was 'read out' of those TS programs

Once again liberals demonstrate their affinity for blaming others and their abhorance of taking personal responsibility.

- 'It's not MY red line - It's the WORLD's red line

- The state dept said Hillary could have her own personal server so every crime she committed using it after that is the state dept's fault....

FAIL / WRONG.

Again...the sender is responsible for ensuring documents are properly marked

Why aren't Republicans going after the senders of those documents?

 

[rightwinger]

Not classified secret or classified top secret etc and marked as such,when she received them....

so she got no classified intel, with all the Libya stuff going on? You're a classic example of brainwashing.

Actually, it's the right wing echo chamber that has done a good job brainwashing you all on the right.

The emails she received were generated from the unclassified .gov email system, and were not marked or designated SECRET or top SECRET when she received them. Some email chains received/sent by her are now being designated/ marked classified before the FOIA release.

NONE, ABSOLUTELY NONE of these now classified top SECRET emails that she received through the .gov state dept email system came from the government's Top secret email system, they were from the government's UNCLASSIFIED .gov email system.

So yes, nothing she received from the State department, was classified secret or top SECRET, at the time the email communication took place.

Do you understand now?

If someone sends a secret document to an unclassified account.....the violation is on the sender

Why aren't Republicans going after the sender of those emails?

The REPUBLICANS aren't conducting the investigation - the FBI, led by the man Obama appointed, is. The FBI also IS going after some of the 'senders'. Frim what I renember reading, Huna, for example, has already been talked to as part of the investigation...

Sure they aren't

 

[Iceweasel]

Not classified secret or classified top secret etc and marked as such,when she received them....

so she got no classified intel, with all the Libya stuff going on? You're a classic example of brainwashing.

Actually, it's the right wing echo chamber that has done a good job brainwashing you all on the right.

The emails she received were generated from the unclassified .gov email system, and were not marked or designated SECRET or top SECRET when she received them. Some email chains received/sent by her are now being designated/ marked classified before the FOIA release.

NONE, ABSOLUTELY NONE of these now classified top SECRET emails that she received through the .gov state dept email system came from the government's Top secret email system, they were from the government's UNCLASSIFIED .gov email system.

So yes, nothing she received from the State department, was classified secret or top SECRET, at the time the email communication took place.

Do you understand now?

If someone sends a secret document to an unclassified account.....the violation is on the sender

Why aren't Republicans going after the sender of those emails?

The REPUBLICANS aren't conducting the investigation - the FBI, led by the man Obama appointed, is. The FBI also IS going after some of the 'senders'. Frim what I renember reading, Huna, for example, has already been talked to as part of the investigation...

They're running scared.