Donald Trumps Very Bad, Not So Good Day In Court

[forkup]

There is no source upon which I'd rely that you'd accept.

But I accept that.

Impasse.

That's why 48 days from today will be such a fun time!

You don't find Gateway Pundit acceptable? Interesting, I don't think I can get you a more partisan right-wing rag but hey whatever floats your boat.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

"You Can't Have Your Cake And Eat It" - Special Master Raymond Dearie Blasts Trump's Lawyers in Preliminary Conference | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Judge Raymond Dearie, the “special master” appointed to review the ‘classified’ documents seized from Mar-a-Lago blasted Trump’s lawyers at Tuesday’s preliminary conference.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

This is from the Gateway pundit.

Wasted keystrokes. I already knew how you feel about The Gateway Pundit.

But waste all the keystrokes, time, space and air that you want. I can't stop you from doing so.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You don't find Gateway Pundit acceptable? Interesting, I don't think I can get you a more partisan right-wing rag but hey whatever floats your boat.

Quote me saying I do or don't find Gateway Pundit acceptable.

Quote me now.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

thehill

Certainly no bias there.

That makes three sources you've poo-pooed.

Know where you won't find a trace of this? On the alt-right media sites you frequent.
Why? They aren't legitimate media. You've been given two reputable sources here, chuckles.

Deal with it.

 

[Oddball]

If Trump lies to his lawyer, how does that expose the lawyer to perjury?

It doesn't....That poster is toweringly stupid, to go with being a compulsive liar.

 

[forkup]

Wasted keystrokes. I already knew how you feel about The Gateway Pundit.

But waste all the keystrokes, time, space and air that you want. I can't stop you from doing so.

How I feel about the Gateway Pundit is irrelevant. What is relevant is that they report essentially the same information and YOU reject it still.

 

[forkup]

That makes three sources you've poo-pooed.

No where you won't find a trace of this? On the alt-right media sites you frequent.
Why? They aren't legitimate media. You've been given two reputable sources here, chuckles.

Deal with it.

Lol I gave him a link to the Gateway Pundit that says exactly the same thing and he still pretends he can't read.

 

[rightwinger]

If Trump lies to his lawyer, how does that expose the lawyer to perjury?

Because the lawyer is taking what Trump said is the truth in a court of law.
Trump won’t say that under oath, he demands his lawyer do it for him

Would you represent Trump?
<By the way, he is unlikely to pay you>

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Quote me saying I do or don't find Gateway Pundit acceptable.

Quote me now.

I'm waiting for that quote, forkup

 

[forkup]

Quote me saying I do or don't find Gateway Pundit acceptable.

Quote me now.

This is from the Gateway pundit.

A link that gave you the exact same report as the other sources you reject.

There is no source upon which I'd rely that you'd accept.

And here I'm proving you wrong because I just linked the Gateway Pundit to you.

 

[Ralph Norton]

Because the lawyer is taking what Trump said is the truth in a court of law.
Trump won’t say that under oath, he demands his lawyer do it for him

Would you represent Trump?
<By the way, he is unlikely to pay you>

You need to look up the definition of perjury.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Get an actual SOURCE.

Then maybe I'll invest my time in one of your posts.

It has been all over the news and can be googled or whatever search engine of your choice.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

That makes three sources you've poo-pooed.

Know where you won't find a trace of this? On the alt-right media sites you frequent.
Why? They aren't legitimate media. You've been given two reputable sources here, chuckles.

Deal with it.

Wow. Didn't that make you sound intelligent?

I made it clear already that we will never agree on what an accurate and fair source is.

Time for you to shut up and go off into the corner and cry.

 

[Oddball]

How I feel about the Gateway Pundit is irrelevant. What is relevant is that they report essentially the same information and YOU reject it still.

OK....Let's stipulate that there's some credibility to the story.

Can you name a time that defense attornies don't throw everything they can against what they're up against?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I'm waiting for that quote, forkup

Still waiting forkup. Quote me now or you are owned.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It has been all over the news and can be googled or whatever search engine of your choice.

You actually use google? And expect me to do the same?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

For those questioning the slant of Skew Source can look it up here:

judge dearie at DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.

duckduckgo.com

Fact is Trump legal team better understand they can’t have it both ways.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

You actually use google? And expect me to do the same?

I expect you to read seeing I also added “ OR WHATEVER SEARCH ENGINE OF YOUR CHOICE “!

No wonder why you are so damn obtuse and ignorant!

 

[forkup]

OK....Let's stipulate that there's some credibility to the story.

Can you name a time that defense attornies don't throw everything they can against what they're up against?

Sure, this time they seem to stop at making the actual claim to a judge that Trump actually declassified those documents. That is the whole fight at the moment. The special master wants Trump's lawyers to state in court whether or not Trump declassified these documents. And they don't want to do so.

Lawyers can do a lot of things in front of a judge. Spin, obfuscate, delay, etc. etc. They can however not make knowingly false statements. This I very much suspect falls in that category hence the hesitancy to actually do what the judge is asking of them.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I expect you to read seeing I also added “ OR WHATEVER SEARCH ENGINE OF YOUR CHOICE “!

No wonder why you are so damn obtuse and ignorant!

Awwwwwwwwww...... you're so cute when you're violently enraged.