To put Hitlers beliefs on Trump is mostly unsustainable. What is sustainable is that alot of the stuff that made Hitler's rice to power possible. A relitively large part of the population feeling disenfranchised by its goverment. The weimar republic for germany. The change in demographics in the states, the white male is becoming less prevalent (this is generalising of course there are more reason they feel disenfranchised but that's a big one). So human nature turn to the strong leader type AKA hitler,Trump. A strong demagouge with a knack for tapping in that discontenment. Ultranationalism. A simple message and a clear enemy. The jews,gypsies and the like for Germany. And immegrants and Muslims for Trump. A tendency to use inflamotory retoric. Then we come to personality. Hitler was extremely narcisstic and if you ever saw 'der undergang' very petty. This can also be said of Trump.You also ask his supporters to ask to pledge to vote for him , wich you can quite easily compare to the fuhrer oath the wehrmacht had to take. In short is Trump like hitler, maybe not a mirror image but to claim you can draw no comparisens is clearly false.
You just described Obama and Clinton more than Trump. They constantly insist that minorities are being oppressed by white people, the same way Hitler insisted that Germans were oppressed by the Jews. And, now there's the employment of the Left's SA to intimidate American citizens.
Ill take that bet if you want , you post blips of obama and hilary saying minorities are oppressed and ill look up Trumps remarks on muslims and immegrants and then we'll compare tone and frequency.
You mean illegal immigrants?
I mean immigrants. If you call for a complete ban on all muslims coming into the country, if you say “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems. They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime. They’re rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they’re telling us what we’re getting.” then you can hardly claim you're making fine distinction and you can't exactly caim the tone is anything but incendiary. Hence inflamatorry retoric, if he would really believe it then we would have even bigger problems.