I just cant shake the feeling that Chief Justice John Roberts sat down with the president and worked out a way for him to rule in favor of the ACA.
Thats not so far-fetched when you remember that Barack Taqiyya taught the Constitution. Even though his interpretations leave a lot to be desired he was clever enough to mangle the meaning of liberties to suit his parasite worldview . . . the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.
When he says liberties he means Rights:
So how come he didnt say Quality, affordable care is not some earned privilege its a liberty. The answer is obvious. Its impossible to fund liberty with tax dollars.
Indeed, his positive liberties theory contradicts the very essence of liberty at the same time his interpretation reinforces Rights he calls negative . . . the liberties protected by the Bill of Rights.
Either Taqiyya was deliberately trying to mislead everyone from the get-go, or he is so hung up on slavery in Colonial America he will go to his grave insisting that his positive liberties mean freedom when, in fact, they must enslave:
Sad to say, nobody with a public voice ever pointed out that every one of Taqiyyas positive Rights has to be funded with tax dollars, while not one negative Right in the Constitution requires funding.
Taqiyyas sly definitions of positive Rights and negative Rights were never plausible, yet he and fellow Democrats managed to codify his hardcore Communist wealth redistribution scheme. With that in mind, I have no doubt that he had a hand in formulating Roberts decision.
I think I will be proven right after healthcare.gov is working well-enough to move it out of the headlines. Its a tax will hit Americans with a poleaxe after the government gets around to forcing them to fund the law itself instead of trying to sign up on a flawed website.
Incidentally, blaming the insurance company is a nice piece of misdirection. Anybody with an ounce of brains knows that Taqiyya has been in bed with the insurance industry just as Hillary Clinton was when insurance companies were so deeply involved in HillaryCare. I will never understand Americans who believe that the insurance industry opposes the government forcing everybody to buy insurance.
Secrecy was another item HillaryCare and HillaryCare II had in common. The famous Harry and Louise TV commercial in opposition to HillaryCare was funded by the insurance industry. Nevertheless, after the HillaryCare debacle ended, hints of insurance industry HillaryCare input were uncovered.
If nothing else convinces you try this. Democrats are Wall Streets best friends. There is not a chance that universal healthcare will eventually eliminate every private healthcare insurance company as many claim. Correction: There is one way. Trading tax dollar funded healthcare investment instruments on Wall Street is the exception.
If you research HillaryCare youll find that Hillarys 500 strong White House Task Force was shrouded in so much secrecy nobody at the time knew the names or the backgrounds of the people writing HillaryCare, or how much they were paid.
Finally, the way the Supreme Court has been going its time to replace Lady Justices balance scale with a tablet that reads: Dont Mess Around With The Basics.
Thats not so far-fetched when you remember that Barack Taqiyya taught the Constitution. Even though his interpretations leave a lot to be desired he was clever enough to mangle the meaning of liberties to suit his parasite worldview . . . the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkpdNtTgQNM]2001 Obama WBEZ Interview Redistribution Wealth Warren Court - YouTube[/ame]
When he says liberties he means Rights:
So how come he didnt say Quality, affordable care is not some earned privilege its a liberty. The answer is obvious. Its impossible to fund liberty with tax dollars.
Indeed, his positive liberties theory contradicts the very essence of liberty at the same time his interpretation reinforces Rights he calls negative . . . the liberties protected by the Bill of Rights.
Either Taqiyya was deliberately trying to mislead everyone from the get-go, or he is so hung up on slavery in Colonial America he will go to his grave insisting that his positive liberties mean freedom when, in fact, they must enslave:
Sad to say, nobody with a public voice ever pointed out that every one of Taqiyyas positive Rights has to be funded with tax dollars, while not one negative Right in the Constitution requires funding.
Taqiyyas sly definitions of positive Rights and negative Rights were never plausible, yet he and fellow Democrats managed to codify his hardcore Communist wealth redistribution scheme. With that in mind, I have no doubt that he had a hand in formulating Roberts decision.
I think I will be proven right after healthcare.gov is working well-enough to move it out of the headlines. Its a tax will hit Americans with a poleaxe after the government gets around to forcing them to fund the law itself instead of trying to sign up on a flawed website.
Incidentally, blaming the insurance company is a nice piece of misdirection. Anybody with an ounce of brains knows that Taqiyya has been in bed with the insurance industry just as Hillary Clinton was when insurance companies were so deeply involved in HillaryCare. I will never understand Americans who believe that the insurance industry opposes the government forcing everybody to buy insurance.
Secrecy was another item HillaryCare and HillaryCare II had in common. The famous Harry and Louise TV commercial in opposition to HillaryCare was funded by the insurance industry. Nevertheless, after the HillaryCare debacle ended, hints of insurance industry HillaryCare input were uncovered.
If nothing else convinces you try this. Democrats are Wall Streets best friends. There is not a chance that universal healthcare will eventually eliminate every private healthcare insurance company as many claim. Correction: There is one way. Trading tax dollar funded healthcare investment instruments on Wall Street is the exception.
If you research HillaryCare youll find that Hillarys 500 strong White House Task Force was shrouded in so much secrecy nobody at the time knew the names or the backgrounds of the people writing HillaryCare, or how much they were paid.
Finally, the way the Supreme Court has been going its time to replace Lady Justices balance scale with a tablet that reads: Dont Mess Around With The Basics.
