DOJ Appeals Trump Judges Special Master Ruling

[Lastamender]

Haha, look at your posts. Like a frustrated child trying to get someone at the adult table at Thanksgiving to pay attention to him.

We have 4 million new people in this country and we have no idea who they are. We have no, none, national security.

Do not forget China owns Biden.

 

[Sandy Shanks]

“The opinion, I think, was wrong, and I think the government should appeal it. It’s deeply flawed in a number of ways,” Barr said on Fox on Tuesday.

A federal judge in Florida appointed by Trump interjected herself into a national security matter, halting the DOJ's investigation of the classified documents stolen by Trump.

This is dangerous, very dangerous.

It seems apparent the overwhelmed judge did it for political reasons because her legal opinions for doing so were flawed. Trump's attorney general indicated that was the case (see above).

The DOJ intends to stop her.

The Post reports, "The Justice Department said it would appeal a federal judge’s decision to appoint a special master to sift through thousands of documents the FBI seized from Donald Trump’s Florida residence on Aug. 8, according to a Thursday court filing.

"The notice of appeal arrived three days after Judge Aileen M. Cannon ruled in favor of Trump and said she would appoint a special master, slowing — at least temporarily — an investigation into the possible mishandling of extremely sensitive classified information, as well as possible hiding, tampering or destruction of government records.

"In a separate, simultaneous court filing, prosecutors asked Cannon to stay her Sept. 5 decision on two key points: her order to temporarily halt a significant portion of the FBI investigation into the potential mishandling of classified information, and to allow a special master to review the classified material that is among the documents seized as part of a court-authorized search at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club on Aug. 8.

"Ultimately, the Justice Department said that a special master could be appointed, but argued that the judge should prohibit the special master from reviewing classified documents. The special master would be still able to sort through personal documents and other items the FBI also seized, setting aside materials as necessary, the filing says."

As further proof that Trump's judge had no idea what she was doing, the prosecutors were forced to point out to the judge "that allowing a special master to review the classified material would “cause the most immediate and serious harms to the government and the public,” noting that those documents have already been moved to a secure facility, separate from the rest of the seized Trump papers.

Put a different way, Trump's judge is a threat to our national security.

As can be readily seen, Trump is no stranger to providing threats to our national security.

The Jan. 6 committee hearings investigating Trump's attempt to overthrow our elected government will resume shortly.

It is no surprise to see that Trump's grassroots Republicans and Republican lawmakers are avoiding these issues entirely. The last one to speak out was a Republican Senator who threatened riots in the streets if Trump is indicted.

 

[Marener]

How many times have we heard that somebody would get the search warrant thrown out?

And especially warrants on this level, where they have to be approved at the highest levels.

It’s narrative formation. Now they’ve successfully made it an indisputable fact that the warrant is invalid.

When the warrant isn’t thrown out, it’s just proof that the system is corrupt.

 

[meaner gene]

We have 4 million new people in this country and we have no idea who they are. We have no, none, national security.

Do not forget China owns Biden.

I think national security deals more with preventing a nuclear exchange, where 100 million Americans get killed the first day, and countless more in the following months.

 

[kyzr]

So far Trump has nothing on the legitimacy of the warrant. The special master is not related.
If being an Epstein fan were disqualifying, Alan Dershowitz’s wouldn’t be pushed in every one of these threads.
Calling the search warrant too broad is absurd and demonstrates ignorance of the way law enforcement does investigations.

1. The DOJ has been known to falsify evidence. Trump should have the right to challenge the affidavit and search warrant.
2. The magistrate was biased, period. He may also have been unqualified to approve the search warrant. (not a real judge)
3. The 4th Amendment calls for specific "things to be seized". Trump's warrant had no specific documents listed.
4. It was an illegal search, including attorney-client documents, HIPPA documents, passports, and Melania's panties.

Search Warrant Requirements - FindLaw

FindLaw's search and seizure section details the Fourth Amendment's search warrant rules and other topics related to searches and seizures.

www.findlaw.com

 

[meaner gene]

It’s narrative formation. Now they’ve successfully made it an indisputable fact that the warrant is invalid.

When the warrant isn’t thrown out, it’s just proof that the system is corrupt.

If you think about it. Trumpers have been trying to invalidate every facet of America., that could be used to stop their freewheeling corruption.
They went after the intelligence community, the DOJ, the FBI, the Capitol police, district attorneys, even the IRS.

 

[meaner gene]

3. The 4th Amendment calls for specific "things to be seized". Trump's warrant had no specific documents listed.

So you think if they get a search warrant on a drug dealer, they have to list which specific drugs they're looking for. They know he has fentanyl, but have to specifically list every other possible illegal drugs he may have?

Trump had 11,000 pages of stolen documents.

 

[Foxfyre]

When Democrats do it, it's a protest.

"Mostly peaceful" protest. You need to be precise in these things.

 

[Lastamender]

I think national security deals more with preventing a nuclear exchange, where 100 million Americans get killed the first day, and countless more in the following months.

I think another 9/11 is right up there too. But they do not seem worried about it.

 

[Marener]

1. The DOJ has been known to falsify evidence. Trump should have the right to challenge the affidavit and search warrant.
2. The magistrate was biased, period. He may also have been unqualified to approve the search warrant. (not a real judge)
3. The 4th Amendment calls for specific "things to be seized". Trump's warrant had no specific documents listed.
4. It was an illegal search, including attorney-client documents, HIPPA documents, passports, and Melania's panties.

Search Warrant Requirements - FindLaw

FindLaw's search and seizure section details the Fourth Amendment's search warrant rules and other topics related to searches and seizures.

www.findlaw.com

Trump can challenge the search warrant when it goes to trial.

Personal opinion of the magistrate does not qualify as a legitimate legal reason for anything.

The warrant specific what documents to be seized. Classified documents and presidential records.

The search authorized to take documents in boxes that records were found. It was spelled out in the warrant. The filter team spent time to review the documents and return what was necessary. The FBI couldn’t have done that during the search. It wasn’t illegal.

 

[BWK]

We have no national security so what are you bitching about?

Huh? Not if you give it to everybody you clown.

 

[Lastamender]

Huh? Not if you give to everybody you clown.

Open borders clown. National security is nil.

 

[BWK]

1. The appeal process will start by Trump trying to get the illegal search warrant and all "evidence" collected illegally tossed. The affidavit needs to be reviewed for legitimacy. This "banana republic" style raid on an ex-president's home needs to be reviewed for legitimacy.
2. If the appeal is limited to just the "special master" then we'll see what happens.
3. The magistrate who approved the search warrant was an Epstein fan, a political hack, and not qualified to approve the search warrant.
4. The search warrant was too broad. This illegal fishing expedition needs to end.

There was no illegal search warrant. What is your legal argument that it is illegal?

 

[BWK]

Open borders clown. National security is nil.

No one is giving documents to a non-existing open border policy you idiot. You are some more kind of retarded sonny boy.

 

[scruffy]

If you think about it. Trumpers have been trying to invalidate every facet of America., that could be used to stop their freewheeling corruption.

Oh yeah? You mean the corruption you keep looking for but have been totally unable to find?

They went after the intelligence community, the DOJ, the FBI, the Capitol police, district attorneys, even the IRS.

I think you have that backwards

The DOJ and FBI are weaponized and harassing and intimidating the political opposition.

And the IRS went after conservatives. At Obama's direction.

 

[BWK]

Inventing bizarre implausible excuses to defend Trump is a bad look. You are in the cult.

Deep into it.

 

[BWK]

Oh yeah? You mean the corruption you keep looking for but have been totally unable to find?



I think you have that backwards

The DOJ and FBI are weaponized and harassing and intimidating the political opposition.

And the IRS went after conservatives. At Obama's direction.

We have found plenty of corruption from the cult party.

Where is the harrassment and weaponization? You mean exercising the rule of law?

 

[BWK]

We have 4 million new people in this country and we have no idea who they are. We have no, none, national security.

Do not forget China owns Biden.

They have no idea who we are either; Imperial Borders and Mythical Frontiers - TheHumanist.com

 

[BWK]

I guess you want...
Trespassers to take jobs away from Americans.
Cheap, foreign, slave labor from China.
Business Visas that you can yell at.

AKA you're a scumbag.
But I knew that already.

Trespassers? Which ones?

Imperial Borders and Mythical Frontiers - TheHumanist.com

IMMIGRATION IS THE FOCAL POINT of the political moment, and it is the thing we Americans think about most foolishly—with the least history or context, with little common sense, and almost no perspective. It’s talked about as a new and unique national crisis for the very same reasons it’s been...

thehumanist.com

 

[Lastamender]

No one is giving documents to a non-existing open border policy you idiot. You are some more kind of retarded sonny boy.

No just terrorists and criminals walking around free. What could possibly go wrong?