Doing Strict Construction of Article I Plus Article II, "And" Word(?) Uses: Unless Anyone Needs To Chuse The Plural(?)

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
The incitement and arousal of the Storming Crowd of Jan 6 is too much in Public Evidence to every go away: Anytime soon. There is an ancient English reminder, even, that some likely process creates an outcome. "An" is not "And," even a Supreme Court Justice--having lost its mind--might note(?)! That person can even be a he, she, or it anymore! "Madness" can apply universally(?)!

1) Anciently written, the Senate does not do impeachment. The House of Representative does that--even going back to when they could "Chuse" That. Republican contentions that the House no longer has the authority to "Chuse," since that is clearly obsolete--goes to that reference about Supreme Court Justices(?)! It is about that relevant.

2) So the House of Representatives even acted timely: Choosing to Impeach the President during the lawful term. Likely the House can "Chuse" a different timeline, in the ancient English of the written document. No timeline is created.

3) The Senate gets in on it, anciently: Having the sole power to create a trial. No specific in or out of office time-line is anciently created, even there.

4) Even the concept of time-line is only inferred. The trial of President requires a Chief Justice. The concurrent terms of Senators also has to be inferred. No person shall be convicted without two thirds of apparently current Senators present. By now, there are even likely to found: A lot of dead Senators--if at all this is even close to being about about elections in the United States(?). "Members" are probably current, anyone notices: Especially in their dues(?)!

5) So what finally makes sense is that the outcome of the trial shall not extend further than to removal from office--a current office-holder implied. Then there is more: AND disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the under the United States. . . .

6) The personal "Profit" alone appears to make sense to any current office-holders--even just to the matter of getting paid in valid currency. "And" disqualification from anything further opens a more inclusive timeline. Not just current bribes are included--but any bribes generally going forward are included(?).

7) Disqualification aside: Any Son-of-A-Bitch--Bitches included--at least gets immediately removed--punto. Disqualification is not always applied, "And," aside. There is clearly timeline flexibility: Even in the penalty clause, II Section 4. "Disqualification" may or may not be applied, though it would appropriate in the event of trial and conviction after leaving office.
______________________________
Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law.

Article 2, Section 4
The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
________________________

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(For a really ancient "Good Time:" See Deut 23: 19-20, wherein Moses probably deified the Royal Family and associated households of subjugating, Imperial Egypt--if not them all, at least the adoptive dad, aka Pharaoh! Moses may have also said(?): "When all is said an done--I was a lot better off as a kid!")
 
Last edited:
The incitement and arousal of the Storming Crowd of Jan 6 is too much in Public Evidence to every go away: Anytime soon. There is an ancient English reminder, even, that some likely process creates an outcome. "An" is not "And," even a Supreme Court Justice--having lost its mind--might note(?)! That person can even be a he, she, or it anymore! "Madness" can apply universally(?)!

1) Anciently written, the Senate does not do impeachment. The House of Representative does that--even going back to when they could "Chuse" That. Republican contentions that the House no longer has the authority to "Chuse," since that is clearly obsolete--goes to that reference about Supreme Court Justices(?)! It is about that relevant.

2) So the House of Representatives even acted timely: Choosing to Impeach the President during the lawful term. Likely the House can "Chuse" a different timeline, in the ancient English of the written document. No timeline is created.

3) The Senate gets in on it, anciently: Having the sole power to create a trial. No specific in or out of office time-line is anciently created, even there.

4) Even the concept of time-line is only inferred. The trial of President requires a Chief Justice. The concurrent terms of Senators also has to be inferred. No person shall be convicted without two thirds of apparently current Senators present. By now, there are even likely to found: A lot of dead Senators--if at all this is even close to being about about elections in the United States(?). "Members" are probably current, anyone notices: Especially in their dues(?)!

5) So what finally makes sense is that the outcome of the trial shall not extend further than to removal from office--a current office-holder implied. Then there is more: AND disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the under the United States. . . .

6) The personal "Profit" alone appears to make sense to any current office-holders--even just to the matter of getting paid in valid currency. "And" disqualification from anything further opens a more inclusive timeline. Not just current bribes are included--but any bribes generally going forward are included(?).

7) Disqualification aside: Any Son-of-A-Bitch--Bitches included--at least gets immediately removed--punto. Disqualification is not always applied, "And," aside. There is clearly timeline flexibility: Even in the penalty clause, II Section 4. "Disqualification" may or may not be applied, though it would appropriate in the event of trial and conviction after leaving office.
______________________________
Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law.

Article 2, Section 4
The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
________________________

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(For a really ancient "Good Time:" See Deut 23: 19-20, wherein Moses probably deified the Royal Family and associated households of subjugating, Imperial Egypt--if not them all, at least the adoptive dad, aka Pharaoh! Moses may have also said(?): "When all is said an done--I was a lot better off as a kid!")

Might want to just blurt out what it is you want to say about the conjunction "and", without going into the complete history of sassafras production in Victorian Burma.
 
In Red States. Their National Attention immediately turned, in 2016, To the ancient Imperial Roman Practice of baby abandonment. The urban locations of the deposit of newborn may have been known and customary. In the hinterlands and occupied areas the possible reference is more of the message in Matt 25: 14-30.


Whether or not the person of the Fable-Maker, Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary--mostly in English, called, "Oh Christ," existed as an individual: There are records of what messages there were. "Cast into Outer Darkness," could just as easily record the description of the rural abandonments. Crying may have been heard. Ravenous predators munching on their prey.

The modern-day Christians even kept the Stimulus enhancements money, and the equal amount checks: And complained that they could only open partially due to the plague. Greedy and uncaring they were shown.

Now there is the $15.00 per hour proposal of the Minimum Wage. Among the Christians, GOP: DOA it has become!

Market-spending money is not what they are on record, intending. Even their procedural motion votes are best summarized in Trumped-Up Incitement terms! "Way to Go, Rand Paul! Let's Go!"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(For a really ancient "Good Time:" See Deut 23: 19-20, wherein Moses probably deified the Royal Family and associated households of subjugating, Imperial Egypt--if not them all, at least the adoptive dad, aka Pharaoh! Moses may have also said(?): "When all is said an done--I was a lot better off as a kid!")
 

Forum List

Back
Top