Does Rosenstein believe that Putin is going

[SassyIrishLass]

Of course not. It was important to get those facts on record to support facts found about people who are here and are available for punishment.

You mean like Hillary Clinton who had an unsecured server that was used to attack the DNC by anyone

Lol, "but...but...but... Hillary!"

LMAO

Hillary is directly involved in it...why don't you know that? The entire free world knows

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The loons have to do something to keep the charade going.

Yes the loons ,otherwise called the republican party certainly showed their true colors Blaming an FBI agent and the agency full of trump people for all of their neglecting the real problems facing America Those AH's totally disregard russia hacking in and helping the POS in our wh...Shame on them

Obama knew about the hacking and the fake dossier Hillary paid for. He encouraged it. Go **** yourself.

MORE fake news!

Actually it's not. You're a clueless one

 

[westwall]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

If the whole reason to not release all of those documents that the Oversight Committee wants is because they will supposedly expose "sources and methods" and the actual indictment MUST release some of those very same "Sources and Methods" for a group of people who will NEVER see the inside of a Courtroom it seems that maybe what the DOJ has been telling us is a lie. Just sayin...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Indicting ones you have zero chance of ever prosecuting seems odd....thinking people might think there is another agenda like oh perhaps appeasing a certain faction and giving the appearance you're actually doing something. It's a smoke screen

 

[Coyote]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Indicting ones you have zero chance of ever prosecuting seems odd....thinking people might think there is another agenda like oh perhaps appeasing a certain faction and giving the appearance you're actually doing something. It's a smoke screen

No, it's not odd. We do it all the time. We did it with Chinese hackings. It sends a message and lays the groundwork for sanctions. If we have the evidence to support an indictment, we should make it.

 

[Rosy]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Should the American hackers who compiled this report be indicted?

LOL give up and go to bed

 

[Crepitus]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Since most of those Russians probably gave lots of money to Trump.

Putin gave Hillary 150 mill and bill got 500 grand, that's $150,500,000.00

Put a link where your assumptions are.

No problem

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Already been debunked. Right here by a trusted rwnj source.

 

[Rosy]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Indicting ones you have zero chance of ever prosecuting seems odd....thinking people might think there is another agenda like oh perhaps appeasing a certain faction and giving the appearance you're actually doing something. It's a smoke screen

No, it's not odd. We do it all the time. We did it with Chinese hackings. It sends a message and lays the groundwork for sanctions. If we have the evidence to support an indictment, we should make it.

LOL sanction every country that has a hacker in it...…………………..

What country would not be sanctioned?

 

[Crepitus]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Should the American hackers who compiled this report be indicted?

LOL give up and go to bed

You can bet Russia would love to, or worse.

 

[Rosy]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Since most of those Russians probably gave lots of money to Trump.

Putin gave Hillary 150 mill and bill got 500 grand, that's $150,500,000.00

Put a link where your assumptions are.

No problem

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Already been debunked. Right here by a trusted rwnj source.

OH no, are you one of Hillarie's fact checkers


Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

 

[SassyIrishLass]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Indicting ones you have zero chance of ever prosecuting seems odd....thinking people might think there is another agenda like oh perhaps appeasing a certain faction and giving the appearance you're actually doing something. It's a smoke screen

No, it's not odd. We do it all the time. We did it with Chinese hackings. It sends a message and lays the groundwork for sanctions. If we have the evidence to support an indictment, we should make it.

It's worthless, no Americans linked, Mewler is nowhere close to getting crap on Trump and Rosenstein is finished...next up will be pulling the plug on this witch hunt. It's past time. Mewler tried and failed. End it

 

[Crepitus]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

So what would you have done? Just let it slide?

obummer did. Why is that?

That's already been addressed in the thread.

Read it.

 

[westwall]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Indicting ones you have zero chance of ever prosecuting seems odd....thinking people might think there is another agenda like oh perhaps appeasing a certain faction and giving the appearance you're actually doing something. It's a smoke screen

No, it's not odd. We do it all the time. We did it with Chinese hackings. It sends a message and lays the groundwork for sanctions. If we have the evidence to support an indictment, we should make it.

I only can remember the five chinese hackers indicted in 2014. And likewise they too will never see the inside of a Courtroom, and more to the point, the chinese were then told in big letters that their methods had been figured out so they changed tactics. That seems kind of stupid to me. If you are never going to be able to prosecute them why tell them you figured out what they are doing. Far better would be to ply them with fake info to screw up their spying results.

 

[Crepitus]

Of course not. It was important to get those facts on record to support facts found about people who are here and are available for punishment.

You mean like Hillary Clinton who had an unsecured server that was used to attack the DNC by anyone

Lol, "but...but...but... Hillary!"

LMAO

Hillary is directly involved in it...why don't you know that? The entire free world knows

Separate incidents, unrelated. Clinton's private server was long dismantled by this time.

 

[Crepitus]

The loons have to do something to keep the charade going.

Yes the loons ,otherwise called the republican party certainly showed their true colors Blaming an FBI agent and the agency full of trump people for all of their neglecting the real problems facing America Those AH's totally disregard russia hacking in and helping the POS in our wh...Shame on them

Obama knew about the hacking and the fake dossier Hillary paid for. He encouraged it. Go **** yourself.

MORE fake news!

Actually it's not. You're a clueless one

Yeah, I'm afraid it is.

Sorry.

 

[westwall]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

So what would you have done? Just let it slide?

obummer did. Why is that?

That's already been addressed in the thread.

Read it.

No, it hasn't. There would have been no need to broadcast the info to the world, the FBI was ready to implement actions that would prevent the hacking. obummer told them not to. Why?

 

[Coyote]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Indicting ones you have zero chance of ever prosecuting seems odd....thinking people might think there is another agenda like oh perhaps appeasing a certain faction and giving the appearance you're actually doing something. It's a smoke screen

No, it's not odd. We do it all the time. We did it with Chinese hackings. It sends a message and lays the groundwork for sanctions. If we have the evidence to support an indictment, we should make it.

I only can remember the five chinese hackers indicted in 2014. And likewise they too will never see the inside of a Courtroom, and more to the point, the chinese were then told in big letters that their methods had been figured out so they changed tactics. That seems kind of stupid to me. If you are never going to be able to prosecute them why tell them you figured out what they are doing. Far better would be to ply them with fake info to screw up their spying results.

Those are the ones I was thinking of. I think indicting them sends a clear message to the government supporting them...so I support it. It also sends a clear message to the US - that there is enough evidence to support an indictment. Perhaps (though I am not optimstic) that means defluffing a few conspiracy theories

 

[Coyote]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

So what would you have done? Just let it slide?

obummer did. Why is that?

That's already been addressed in the thread.

Read it.

No, it hasn't. There would have been no need to broadcast the info to the world, the FBI was ready to implement actions that would prevent the hacking. obummer told them not to. Why?

Do you have a credible source for that?

 

[Crepitus]

Since most of those Russians probably gave lots of money to Trump.

Putin gave Hillary 150 mill and bill got 500 grand, that's $150,500,000.00

Put a link where your assumptions are.

No problem

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Already been debunked. Right here by a trusted rwnj source.

OH no, are you one of Hillarie's fact checkers


Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

I suppose you think that means something, but I'm at a loss as to what.

 

[Coyote]

To send the entire KGB or whatever they call themselves now to the USA for prosecution?

Yesterday was the dumbest day in US history after the day that Obama was elected

Of course not.

Does that mean we should not indict people who commit crimes?

Indicting ones you have zero chance of ever prosecuting seems odd....thinking people might think there is another agenda like oh perhaps appeasing a certain faction and giving the appearance you're actually doing something. It's a smoke screen

No, it's not odd. We do it all the time. We did it with Chinese hackings. It sends a message and lays the groundwork for sanctions. If we have the evidence to support an indictment, we should make it.

It's worthless, no Americans linked, Mewler is nowhere close to getting crap on Trump and Rosenstein is finished...next up will be pulling the plug on this witch hunt. It's past time. Mewler tried and failed. End it

It isn't worthless. Mueller's (you mispelled his name) mandate is to examine Russian interference in the election.