Does anyone have "Illegal Alien Arsonists" on their Bingo card?

It was not a lie that government managers told rescue workers to skip over people with a Trump sign, and let them starve to death.

It was also not a lie that we were told there might not be enough money to help Americans who lose everything in disasters for the remainder of the year, after FEMA spent a fortune housing illegals.

The sooner the illegals are deported, the better for this country.
MAGA lies.
 
Did they?

Not what I asked, though. California is on fire due to Democrat incompetence. This is not even up for debate; it's a solid, unalterable fact.

Your acknowledgment of reality is neither sought nor required.
The reasons are irrelevant. Why isn’t it incompetent to allow people live on flood plains?
 
The reasons are irrelevant. Why isn’t it incompetent to allow people live on flood plains?
It’s a free country. I personally would not live in a town below sea level - they can’t even bury their dead - but if they want to take that risk, it’s their choice.
 
It’s a free country. I personally would not live in a town below sea level - they can’t even bury their dead - but if they want to take that risk, it’s their choice.
But why help them and not the wildfire victims? They didn’t cause the problems you’re blaming on the politicians.
 
But why help them and not the wildfire victims? They didn’t cause the problems you’re blaming on the politicians.
There will be help. But it will have to be limited. The nation is $35T in debt. Maybe we call allocate a portion of the $150 billion (a year) we will save once the illegals are deported.

P.S. Happy Inauguration Day!
 
There will be help. But it will have to be limited. The nation is $35T in debt. Maybe we call allocate a portion of the $150 billion (a year) we will save once the illegals are deported.

P.S. Happy Inauguration Day!
It wasn’t limited for the hurricane victims. That’s punishing perceived political enemies, I.e. unAmerican.
 
It wasn’t limited for the hurricane victims. That’s punishing perceived political enemies, I.e. unAmerican.
Of course it’s limited for the hurricane victims. You think that taxpayers will cover all the costs of those who didn’t have insurance?

We do NOT have to repay people to make them whole. They chose to live in a dangerous area, without insurance.

Same with the wildfire victims. They also chose to risk it by owning property without insurance.

Why do libtards always excuse people for poor choices and make others pay for it?

All we owe is to see that the victims have a safe place to live, and food. We don’t have to rebuild their houses for them.
 
Of course it’s limited for the hurricane victims. You think that taxpayers will cover all the costs of those who didn’t have insurance?

We do NOT have to repay people to make them whole. They chose to live in a dangerous area, without insurance.

Same with the wildfire victims. They also chose to risk it by owning property without insurance.

Why do libtards always excuse people for poor choices and make others pay for it?

All we owe is to see that the victims have a safe place to live, and food. We don’t have to rebuild their houses for them.
There was no “quid pro quo” announced in advance like the Speaker did over the wildfires.
 
There was no “quid pro quo” announced in advance like the Speaker did over the wildfires.
What was that? After all, Newsome is an incompetent governor who prioritized getting lesbians and female blacks into positions they were unqualified for, and they in turn they prioritized smelt over human lives, and thus 20% of the hydrants were dry.

Are we supposed to pretend wokism didn’t hurt?
 
What was that? After all, Newsome is an incompetent governor who prioritized getting lesbians and female blacks into positions they were unqualified for, and they in turn they prioritized smelt over human lives, and thus 20% of the hydrants were dry.

Are we supposed to pretend wokism didn’t hurt?
Why do you want to punish the public for something Newsome did? That’s like refusing to help hurricane victims because the governors made bad flood control decisions.
 
The reasons are irrelevant. Why isn’t it incompetent to allow people live on flood plains?
Nobody's talking about where people should be allowed to live, you buffoon. We're talking about places where the people responsible for mitigating danger haven't...and it's gotten people killed and caused billions of dollars worth of destruction.

But that's one of those inconvenient truths you don't want to examine.
 
Why do you want to punish the public for something Newsome did? That’s like refusing to help hurricane victims because the governors made bad flood control decisions.
California Democrats have been warned of the dangers of irresponsible forestry management for decades.

Why do you refuse to hold them responsible?
 
Probably a Biden Border Jumper.
. . . and paid by Hunter to start the fires in order to write off. . . um. . . "priceless artwork?"

🤪


‘Gutfeld!’: Hunter’s paintings up in smoke?​

 
Nobody's talking about where people should be allowed to live, you buffoon. We're talking about places where the people responsible for mitigating danger haven't...and it's gotten people killed and caused billions of dollars worth of destruction.

But that's one of those inconvenient truths you don't want to examine.
Both situations involve government letting things get out of hand.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom